Health-related quality of life after vascular surgery and endovascular treatment in subjects with critical limb ischemia.
Endovascular treatment
Peripheral arterial disease
Peripheral bypass surgery
Quality of life
Journal
Pakistan journal of medical sciences
ISSN: 1682-024X
Titre abrégé: Pak J Med Sci
Pays: Pakistan
ID NLM: 100913117
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
25
7
2020
pubmed:
25
7
2020
medline:
25
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Revascularization of the target vessel and restoration of distal flow is critical not only to reduce mortality and morbidity but also improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with critical limb ischemia. However, data concerning the impact of surgical bypass and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) on HRQoL is limited. This study aimed to compare the impact of surgical bypass and PTA on HRQoL in subjects undergoing superficial femoral artery (SFA) or popliteal artery revascularization. Seventy-one subjects who underwent successful revascularization of the SFA or popliteal artery either with surgical revascularization or PTA were enrolled in this study. Three months after revascularization, all subjects underwent ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement, 6-minute walking test and completed the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) questionnaire. The NHP score differences (measured at the post-procedural 3 Both groups experienced significant improvements in ABI and 6-minute walking distance at post-procedure three months. NHP total scores of Part I and Part II at post-procedural six months were similar in the two groups. However, social isolation [77.98 (0 - 85) vs. 22.53 (0 - 100), p=0.002] and physical abilities [78.7 (30.31 - 87.7) vs. 54.47 (0 - 100), P=0.014] domain scores of the surgical revascularization group were significantly higher than that of the endovascular treatment group. This study shows that total scores obtained from the NHP questionnaire applied three months after revascularization of SFA stenosis are similar in subjects undergoing surgical revascularization or PTA. However, the social isolation and physical abilities domains of the NHP are significantly higher in subjects receiving surgical revascularization compared to those receiving PTA.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
Revascularization of the target vessel and restoration of distal flow is critical not only to reduce mortality and morbidity but also improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with critical limb ischemia. However, data concerning the impact of surgical bypass and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) on HRQoL is limited. This study aimed to compare the impact of surgical bypass and PTA on HRQoL in subjects undergoing superficial femoral artery (SFA) or popliteal artery revascularization.
METHODS
METHODS
Seventy-one subjects who underwent successful revascularization of the SFA or popliteal artery either with surgical revascularization or PTA were enrolled in this study. Three months after revascularization, all subjects underwent ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement, 6-minute walking test and completed the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) questionnaire. The NHP score differences (measured at the post-procedural 3
RESULTS
RESULTS
Both groups experienced significant improvements in ABI and 6-minute walking distance at post-procedure three months. NHP total scores of Part I and Part II at post-procedural six months were similar in the two groups. However, social isolation [77.98 (0 - 85) vs. 22.53 (0 - 100), p=0.002] and physical abilities [78.7 (30.31 - 87.7) vs. 54.47 (0 - 100), P=0.014] domain scores of the surgical revascularization group were significantly higher than that of the endovascular treatment group.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study shows that total scores obtained from the NHP questionnaire applied three months after revascularization of SFA stenosis are similar in subjects undergoing surgical revascularization or PTA. However, the social isolation and physical abilities domains of the NHP are significantly higher in subjects receiving surgical revascularization compared to those receiving PTA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32704256
doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.5.2680
pii: PJMS-36-877
pmc: PMC7372693
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
877-883Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences.
Références
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017 Dec;41(6):537-547
pubmed: 28147898
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Feb;56(1):31-41
pubmed: 25335942
Sociol Health Illn. 1980 Nov;2(3):231-46
pubmed: 10298135
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;52:147-152
pubmed: 29793014
Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):489-502
pubmed: 29736612
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Nov;44(5):977-83; discussion 983-4
pubmed: 17098529
Circ J. 2018 Apr 25;82(5):1253-1254
pubmed: 29607985
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980 Dec;34(4):281-6
pubmed: 7241028
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Aug;44(2):296-302; discussion 302-3
pubmed: 16814976
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2014 Jun;55(3):307-23
pubmed: 24755699
Vascular. 2016 Feb;24(1):88-95
pubmed: 25827440
Semin Vasc Surg. 2008 Dec;21(4):186-94
pubmed: 19073308
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2002;34(1):55-60
pubmed: 11901968
Vasc Med. 2008 Feb;13(1):15-24
pubmed: 18372434
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002 Jun;23(6):491-4
pubmed: 12093063
Int J Rehabil Res. 2000 Mar;23(1):31-8
pubmed: 10826123
Lancet. 2005 Dec 3;366(9501):1925-34
pubmed: 16325694
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul;92(1):106-114
pubmed: 29521013
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015 Mar;127(5-6):210-7
pubmed: 25421369
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;45 Suppl S:S5-67
pubmed: 17223489
Vasc Med. 2010 Jun;15(3):163-9
pubmed: 20483986
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Aug;36(2):310-7
pubmed: 12170212
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Nov;54(508):826-31
pubmed: 15527608
Circulation. 2016 Sep 27;134(13):901-3
pubmed: 27672197