Interest in meta-research in geriatric medicine: a survey of members of the European Geriatric Medicine Society.
EuGMS
Meta-analysis
Questionnaire
Systematic review
Journal
European geriatric medicine
ISSN: 1878-7649
Titre abrégé: Eur Geriatr Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101533694
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
28
04
2020
accepted:
15
07
2020
pubmed:
25
7
2020
medline:
19
8
2021
entrez:
25
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There has been an exponential increase in meta-research, especially in the branch dealing with systematic reviews [SRs] and meta-analyses [MAs]. However, the knowledge regarding these topics in geriatric medicine is still poorly explored. We therefore undertook a survey of the current knowledge and needs in meta-research in geriatrics. A short survey (taking approximately 5 min to complete) was freely available on the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS) website and disseminated via social networks by the EuGMS and the authors of the survey. The questionnaire was available during the whole year of 2019. The questionnaire specifically addressed demographic information, previous research activities and the knowledge of the participants on meta-research in geriatric medicine. The survey was completed by 291 participants from 36 different countries of about 20,000 EuGMS members (mostly with an age between 55 and 64 years; 51.5% female; mainly from Italy and Germany). Most respondents (65.6%) reported reading more than 20 articles in the past year, but few (36.4%) read more than 10 SRs/MAs. Participants reported that SRs and/or MAs are important in clinical practice: 83.8% giving a score of > 6/10, and 23.0% reporting 10. The large majority of the participants asked for more education in meta-research. In particular, there is need for educational courses for meta-research in geriatric medicine, online or in person, organized by the EuGMS. Our survey shows that interest in SRs/MAs is high, and there is a demand for education on these topics in relation to geriatric medicine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32705627
doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00369-0
pii: 10.1007/s41999-020-00369-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1079-1083Références
Stevens KR (2001) Systematic reviews: the heart of evidence-based practice. Adv Crit Care 12(4):529–538
Møller MH, Ioannidis JP, Darmon M (2018) Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? We are not sure. Springer, Berlin
doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-5039-y
Ioannidis JP, Lau J (1999) Pooling research results: benefits and limitations of meta-analysis. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 25(9):462–469
pubmed: 10481815
Shenkin SD, Harrison JK, Wilkinson T, Dodds RM, Ioannidis JP (2017) Systematic reviews: guidance relevant for studies of older people. Age Ageing 46(5):722–728
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx105
Druss BG, Marcus SC (2005) Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implications for evidence-based medicine. J Med Libr Assoc 93(4):499
pubmed: 16239948
pmcid: 1250328
Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I (2010) Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med 7(9):e1000326
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326
Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (2019) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley, New York
Fontelo P, Liu F (2018) A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries. Syst Rev 7(1):147
doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0819-1
Pussegoda K, Turner L, Garritty C, Mayhew A, Skidmore B, Stevens A et al (2017) Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality. Syst Rev 6(1):131
doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0527-2
Cherubini A, Signore SD, Ouslander J, Semla T, Michel JP (2010) Fighting against age discrimination in clinical trials. J Am Geriatr Soc 58(9):1791–1796
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03032.x
Crome P, Cherubini A, Oristrell J (2014) The PREDICT (increasing the participation of the elderly in clinical trials) study: the charter and beyond. Exp Rev Clin Pharm 7(4):457–468
doi: 10.1586/17512433.2014.922864
Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J (2003) Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care 15(3):261–266
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzg031
Witham MD, Roberts HC, Gladman J, Stott DJ, Aihie SA (2019) Growing research in geriatric medicine. Age Ageing 48(3):316–319
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy220