Comparison of Patient Self-Reported Quality of Life and Health Care Professional-Assessed Symptoms in Terminally ill Patients With Cancer.

EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL Palliative Performance Scale Support Team Assessment Schedule distress symptoms patient with cancer terminally ill

Journal

The American journal of hospice & palliative care
ISSN: 1938-2715
Titre abrégé: Am J Hosp Palliat Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9008229

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 25 7 2020
medline: 29 7 2021
entrez: 25 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Few studies evaluated whether health care professionals accurately assess several symptoms for patients with cancer in palliative care units. We determined the agreement level for several symptoms related to quality of life (QOL) between patient-reported QOL assessment and health care professional-assessed symptoms based on the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS). An observational study was performed with terminally ill patients with cancer hospitalized in the palliative care unit between June 2018 and December 2019. Patients and health care professionals independently assessed 7 symptoms at the time of hospitalization and after 1 week. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL). In examining the proportions of exact agreement, "exact agreement" referred to the pairs of the scores (QLQ-C15-PAL vs STAS) being (1 vs 0), (2 vs 1), (3 vs 2 or 3), or (4 vs 4). The relationships of physical functioning between QLQ-C15-PAL and Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) were examined. Of 130 patients, approximately 60% had PPS scores from 40 to 60. The highest mean score on QLQ-C15-PAL was for fatigue (63.8). The exact agreement on symptoms between patients and health care professionals ranged from 15.4% (fatigue) to 57.7% (nausea and vomiting). The mean of the transformed QLQ-C15-PAL and proportions of exact agreement were negatively correlated ( We expect patient-reported outcomes including QLQ-C15-PAL to be added to health care professionals' assessment of serious symptoms such as fatigue in terminally ill patients with cancer.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Few studies evaluated whether health care professionals accurately assess several symptoms for patients with cancer in palliative care units. We determined the agreement level for several symptoms related to quality of life (QOL) between patient-reported QOL assessment and health care professional-assessed symptoms based on the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS).
METHOD METHODS
An observational study was performed with terminally ill patients with cancer hospitalized in the palliative care unit between June 2018 and December 2019. Patients and health care professionals independently assessed 7 symptoms at the time of hospitalization and after 1 week. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL). In examining the proportions of exact agreement, "exact agreement" referred to the pairs of the scores (QLQ-C15-PAL vs STAS) being (1 vs 0), (2 vs 1), (3 vs 2 or 3), or (4 vs 4). The relationships of physical functioning between QLQ-C15-PAL and Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) were examined.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 130 patients, approximately 60% had PPS scores from 40 to 60. The highest mean score on QLQ-C15-PAL was for fatigue (63.8). The exact agreement on symptoms between patients and health care professionals ranged from 15.4% (fatigue) to 57.7% (nausea and vomiting). The mean of the transformed QLQ-C15-PAL and proportions of exact agreement were negatively correlated (
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
We expect patient-reported outcomes including QLQ-C15-PAL to be added to health care professionals' assessment of serious symptoms such as fatigue in terminally ill patients with cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32705893
doi: 10.1177/1049909120944157
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

283-290

Auteurs

Chikako Matsumura (C)

Education and Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Kyoto, Japan.

Nanako Koyama (N)

Education and Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Kyoto, Japan.

Morito Sako (M)

Department of Pharmacy, Tachibana Medical Corporation 38428Higashisumiyoshimorimoto Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Hideo Kurosawa (H)

Department of Pharmacy, Tachibana Medical Corporation 38428Higashisumiyoshimorimoto Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Takehisa Nomura (T)

Department of Pharmacy, Tachibana Medical Corporation 38428Higashisumiyoshimorimoto Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Yuki Eguchi (Y)

Palliative Care Unit, Tachibana Medical Corporation 38428Higashisumiyoshimorimoto Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Kazuki Ohba (K)

Department of Palliative Care, Tachibana Medical Corporation Higashisumiyoshimorimoto Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Yoshitaka Yano (Y)

Education and Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Kyoto, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH