Using Multiple Sensory Profiling Methods to Gain Insight into Temporal Perceptions of Pea Protein-Based Formulated Foods.

TDS astringent beany bitter formulation legume multi-intake profile

Journal

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2304-8158
Titre abrégé: Foods
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101670569

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Jul 2020
Historique:
received: 25 06 2020
revised: 10 07 2020
accepted: 20 07 2020
entrez: 26 7 2020
pubmed: 28 7 2020
medline: 28 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The food industry is focused on creating plant-based foods that incorporate pea protein isolates. However, pea protein isolates are often described as having persistent beany, bitter, and astringent notes that can decrease the desirability of the resulting foods and make static sensory profiling difficult. To obtain more realistic descriptions of the sensory experiences associated with this category of products, researchers should consider using temporal methods and multi-intake methods, which allow consumers to evaluate whole food portions. This study aimed to understand better how product composition affected the sensory perception of pea protein-based beverages using three different sensory profiling methods. Particular focus was placed on beany, bitter, and astringent notes. Twelve pea protein-based beverages were formulated; they varied in pea protein type (pellet vs. isolate) and their content of gellan gum, salt, sunflower oil, sugar, and soy lecithin. They were evaluated by 16 trained panelists using three sensory profiling methods: static block profiling, mono-intake temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) profiling, and multi-intake TDS profiling. The static block and mono-intake TDS profiling methods yielded complementary results about the impact of beverage composition on attribute perceptions. Static block profiling revealed that beaniness was mainly affected by gellan gum and oil content and that bitterness and astringency were mainly affected by protein type and gellan gum content. Mono-intake TDS profiling highlighted the dynamics of beaniness and the strong persistence of astringency, and its results suggested that higher gellan gum and salt contents could limit this persistence. Multi-intake TDS profiling found that, throughout the consumption of a full product portion, beaniness and bitterness decreased, indicating an adaptation effect, while fattiness increased, indicating a build-up effect. This study has increased the understanding of how pea protein-based beverages are perceived under conditions that more closely resemble those associated with real-life consumption. It has also revealed how product formulation can reduce bitterness and astringency.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32707881
pii: foods9080969
doi: 10.3390/foods9080969
pmc: PMC7466195
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie
ID : ANRT-CIFRE 2017/0815
Organisme : Roquette Freres
ID : ANRT-CIFRE 2017/0815

Références

Dysphagia. 2003 Winter;18(1):46-52
pubmed: 12497196
J Agric Food Chem. 2000 Nov;48(11):5419-23
pubmed: 11087495
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2011 Jan;51(1):67-90
pubmed: 21229419
Chem Senses. 2010 Feb;35(2):157-70
pubmed: 20022913
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008 Jan 25;365(4):851-5
pubmed: 18037373
J Agric Food Chem. 2001 Aug;49(8):3898-905
pubmed: 11513686
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Aug 1;66(30):7873-7879
pubmed: 29962207
J Food Sci. 2017 Nov;82(11):2669-2678
pubmed: 29023703
Chem Senses. 2001 Nov;26(9):1211-9
pubmed: 11705807
J Agric Food Chem. 2014 Jun 25;62(25):5789-95
pubmed: 24881669
Food Chem. 2017 Sep 1;230:215-224
pubmed: 28407903
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1993 Oct;84(1):119-25
pubmed: 8237452
Physiol Behav. 2016 Jun 1;160:80-6
pubmed: 27063245
J Agric Food Chem. 2002 Mar 13;50(6):1593-601
pubmed: 11879042
Physiol Behav. 2003 Jan;78(1):165-9
pubmed: 12536024
Food Res Int. 2015 Sep;75:148-156
pubmed: 28454942
J Sci Food Agric. 2015 Mar 15;95(4):809-18
pubmed: 25205605
Molecules. 2013 May 21;18(5):6035-56
pubmed: 23698054
J Food Sci. 2018 Apr;83(4):1094-1102
pubmed: 29660132
J Agric Food Chem. 2002 May 22;50(11):3283-9
pubmed: 12009999
Proc Nutr Soc. 2018 Nov;77(4):423-431
pubmed: 29661256

Auteurs

Audrey Cosson (A)

Univ Paris Saclay, UMR SayFood, AgroParisTech, INRAE, F-78850 Thiverval Grignon, France.
Roquette Frères, 10 rue haute loge, F-62136 Lestrem, France.

Isabelle Souchon (I)

Avignon Univ, UMR SQPOV, INRAE, F-84000 Avignon, France.

Julia Richard (J)

Univ Paris Saclay, UMR SayFood, AgroParisTech, INRAE, F-78850 Thiverval Grignon, France.

Nicolas Descamps (N)

Roquette Frères, 10 rue haute loge, F-62136 Lestrem, France.

Anne Saint-Eve (A)

Univ Paris Saclay, UMR SayFood, AgroParisTech, INRAE, F-78850 Thiverval Grignon, France.

Classifications MeSH