Retentive Force of Glass-Ceramic Soldered Customized Zirconia Abutment Copings with Prefabricated Titanium Bases.
artificial aging
glass solder
prefabricated titanium bases
resin composite cement
retentive force
zirconia abutments
Journal
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Jul 2020
17 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
28
06
2020
revised:
09
07
2020
accepted:
14
07
2020
entrez:
26
7
2020
pubmed:
28
7
2020
medline:
28
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Two-piece abutments consisting of customized zirconia abutment copings and prefabricated titanium bases are popular due to their biological and esthetic advantages. Glass-ceramic solder (GS) is an alternative biocompatible connective agent. This in vitro study evaluated the retentive force of GS in comparison to classical resin composite cements (RC) after artificial aging and autoclaving. Ninety specimens consisting of prefabricated titanium bases and zirconia abutment copings were fabricated. The two parts of each specimen were fixed either by RC (n = 30) or GS with a luting space of either 30 µm (n = 30) or 100 µm (n = 30). Ten specimens of each group underwent autoclaving before artificial aging (water storage, thermocycling). Twenty specimens (including the 10 autoclaved specimens) of each group were exposed to a mechanical load. The retentive force between the zirconia and titanium in all specimens was determined. A fractographic analysis was performed to analyze the fracture surfaces of the GS specimens. The RC- and GS-connected two-piece abutments showed no relevant differences, independent of the luting space. RC appears to be more vulnerable to the thermal and mechanical loads than GS. Thus, GS may be an appropriate alternative to RC for two-piece abutments, especially for patients with enhanced biocompatibility requirements.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32708937
pii: ma13143193
doi: 10.3390/ma13143193
pmc: PMC7412312
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Camlog Foundation
ID : CF21503
Références
J Prosthodont. 2015 Oct;24(7):580-585
pubmed: 25557585
J Oral Implantol. 2017 Apr;43(2):87-93
pubmed: 27967320
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):1041-1046
pubmed: 30231090
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Apr;117(4):499-506
pubmed: 27769518
J Dent. 2015 Jul;43(7):839-45
pubmed: 25953721
Dent Mater J. 2013;32(4):628-36
pubmed: 23903646
J Dent Res. 1995 Jun;74(6):1253-8
pubmed: 7629333
Dent Mater J. 2011;30(3):274-80
pubmed: 21597225
J Adhes Dent. 2011 Feb;13(1):79-84
pubmed: 21403938
Restor Dent Endod. 2017 Aug;42(3):206-215
pubmed: 28808637
J Periodontol. 2006 Jan;77(1):73-80
pubmed: 16579706
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015 May-Jun;5(3):147-56
pubmed: 26236672
Materials (Basel). 2015 Jul 14;8(7):4287-4298
pubmed: 28793440
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jan 19;33(3):530–535
pubmed: 29355855
Acta Odontol Scand. 2010 May;68(3):154-64
pubmed: 20095949
Dent Mater. 2008 Nov;24(11):1556-67
pubmed: 18466964
J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 Nov-Dec;25(6):666-673
pubmed: 29211288
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Aug;18(4):735-44
pubmed: 25916969
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):921-7
pubmed: 18271373
Dent Mater. 2011 Feb;27(2):e10-9
pubmed: 20932564
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:86-96
pubmed: 17594373
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Aug;120(2):214-219
pubmed: 29627210
J Adv Prosthodont. 2015 Feb;7(1):69-75
pubmed: 25722841
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Dec;16(6):920-5
pubmed: 23527950
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Oct 13;33(3):523–529
pubmed: 29028849
Photomed Laser Surg. 2013 Jun;31(6):261-8
pubmed: 23741995
Dent Mater J. 2018 Mar 30;37(2):214-221
pubmed: 28883299
J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2019 Feb 1;19(2):967-969
pubmed: 30360181
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):7-21
pubmed: 28000280
Materials (Basel). 2013 Sep 11;6(9):4001-4010
pubmed: 28788314
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013 Jun;25(3):159-76
pubmed: 23773511
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Dec;112(6):1392-8
pubmed: 25258263