Clinical Effectiveness of Interlaminar Epidural Injections of Local Anesthetic with or without Steroids for Managing Chronic Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.


Journal

Pain physician
ISSN: 2150-1149
Titre abrégé: Pain Physician
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100954394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2020
Historique:
entrez: 26 7 2020
pubmed: 28 7 2020
medline: 25 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Chronic neck pain is reportedly considered the fourth leading cause of disability. Cervical interlaminar epidural injections are among the commonly administered nonsurgical interventions for managing chronic neck pain, secondary to disc herniation and radiculitis, spinal stenosis, or chronic neck pain of discogenic origin. To systematically review the differences in the effectiveness of cervical epidural injections with local anesthetics with or without steroids for the management of chronic neck pain. Systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search of the literature of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared epidural injections with local anesthetic with or without steroids was performed, including a search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for all years up to May 2019. Meta-analysis was done for pain relief based on the Numeric Rating Scale, functional status based on the Neck Disability Index, and opioid intake dosage. Four studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 370 patients were divided into 2 groups: the experimental group received cervical epidural injection with steroid and local anesthetic, and the control group received injection with local anesthetic only. Regrading pain relief, no significant difference was observed between both groups (weighted mean difference [WMD], -0.006; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.275 to 0.263; P = 0.963; I² = 0.0% at 12 months). There was also no significant difference in the improvement of the functional status (WMD, 0.159; 95% CI, -1.231 to 1.549; P = 0.823; I² = 9.8% at 12 months). Similarly, there was no significant difference in opioid dosage (WMD, -0.093; 95% CI, -5.952 to 5.766; P = 0.975; I² = 0.0% at 12 months). Only a few studies on this premise were found in the literature. There was also a lack of heterogeneity of the included RCT studies. The addition of steroids to anesthetic injectates was not associated with better pain and functional score outcomes compared with anesthetic injectate alone in patients with chronic neck pain. Chronic neck pain, cervical radiculopathy, cervical disc disease, spinal stenosis, facet joint pathology, cervical epidural injections, steroid injections, local anesthetic injections, systematic review, meta-analysis, randomized control trial.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Chronic neck pain is reportedly considered the fourth leading cause of disability. Cervical interlaminar epidural injections are among the commonly administered nonsurgical interventions for managing chronic neck pain, secondary to disc herniation and radiculitis, spinal stenosis, or chronic neck pain of discogenic origin.
OBJECTIVES
To systematically review the differences in the effectiveness of cervical epidural injections with local anesthetics with or without steroids for the management of chronic neck pain.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of the literature of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared epidural injections with local anesthetic with or without steroids was performed, including a search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for all years up to May 2019. Meta-analysis was done for pain relief based on the Numeric Rating Scale, functional status based on the Neck Disability Index, and opioid intake dosage.
RESULTS
Four studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 370 patients were divided into 2 groups: the experimental group received cervical epidural injection with steroid and local anesthetic, and the control group received injection with local anesthetic only. Regrading pain relief, no significant difference was observed between both groups (weighted mean difference [WMD], -0.006; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.275 to 0.263; P = 0.963; I² = 0.0% at 12 months). There was also no significant difference in the improvement of the functional status (WMD, 0.159; 95% CI, -1.231 to 1.549; P = 0.823; I² = 9.8% at 12 months). Similarly, there was no significant difference in opioid dosage (WMD, -0.093; 95% CI, -5.952 to 5.766; P = 0.975; I² = 0.0% at 12 months).
LIMITATIONS
Only a few studies on this premise were found in the literature. There was also a lack of heterogeneity of the included RCT studies.
CONCLUSIONS
The addition of steroids to anesthetic injectates was not associated with better pain and functional score outcomes compared with anesthetic injectate alone in patients with chronic neck pain.
KEY WORDS
Chronic neck pain, cervical radiculopathy, cervical disc disease, spinal stenosis, facet joint pathology, cervical epidural injections, steroid injections, local anesthetic injections, systematic review, meta-analysis, randomized control trial.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32709169

Substances chimiques

Anesthetics, Local 0
Steroids 0

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

335-348

Auteurs

Mohamed Kamal Mesregah (MK)

Department of Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Menoufia University Faculty of Medicine, Shebin El-Kom, Menoufia, Egypt.

Wei Feng (W)

Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Wei-Hsun Huang (WH)

Department of Clinical Sciences, Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated-Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Wei-Cheng Chen (WC)

Department of Clinical Sciences, Beijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated-Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Brandon Yoshida (B)

Department of Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Andrew Mecum (A)

Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Krishna Mandalia (K)

Department of Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Dornsife College of Letters Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Nicholas Van Halm-Lutterodt (N)

Department of Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH