Determinants of duck Tembusu virus NS2A/2B polyprotein procession attenuated viral replication and proliferation in vitro.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 07 2020
24 07 2020
Historique:
received:
12
11
2019
accepted:
16
06
2020
entrez:
26
7
2020
pubmed:
28
7
2020
medline:
22
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Duck Tembusu virus (DTMUV), a mosquito-borne Flavivirus, has caused serious economic losses for the Chinese poultry industry. The genome is translated into a polyprotein that is cleaved to mature protein by host and viral proteases in the host cell, and this proteolytic process is important for the viral life cycle. However, the cleavage mechanism of DTMUV polyprotein is still unclear. In this study, we identified that several amino acids (P1-R, P1'-G, P2-R, P3-T, and P4-V) were vital for NS2A/2B cleavage. Meanwhile, both NS2A and NS2B were essential in cis for polyprotein NS2A/2B intramolecular cleavage. Subsequently, a DTMUV replicon and an infectious clone showed that the P1 site is essential to viral replication, while a mutation in P1' could boost viral RNA replication. Furthermore, a recombinant virus with P1 and P1' site mutations named rDTMUV-NS2A/2B-P1P1'(AA) was rescued from transfected BHK21 cells. The maximum viral titers and viral genome copies of rDTMUV-NS2A/2B-P1P1'(AA) were much lower than those of rDTMUV-WT both in the intracellular and extracellular samples of transfected and infected BHK21 cells. Taken together, the NS2A/2B cleavage sites processed by the NS2B3 protease are vital for DTMUV proliferation and virulence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32709930
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68271-0
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-68271-0
pmc: PMC7381675
doi:
Substances chimiques
NS2B protein, flavivirus
0
Polyproteins
0
Viral Nonstructural Proteins
0
Peptide Hydrolases
EC 3.4.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12423Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
J Virol. 2004 Dec;78(24):13708-16
pubmed: 15564480
Chem Rev. 2018 Apr 25;118(8):4448-4482
pubmed: 29652486
PLoS Pathog. 2015 Dec 30;11(12):e1005350
pubmed: 26717518
Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;17(10):1873-5
pubmed: 22000358
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1975 Mar;69(1):65-71
pubmed: 235907
Virology. 2011 Aug 15;417(1):1-8
pubmed: 21722935
J Virol. 2007 May;81(9):4501-9
pubmed: 17301157
Nat Commun. 2016 Nov 15;7:13410
pubmed: 27845325
J Virol. 1992 Dec;66(12):7549-54
pubmed: 1433530
J Virol. 2002 May;76(10):4773-84
pubmed: 11967294
J Gen Virol. 2017 Oct;98(10):2413-2420
pubmed: 28874226
J Virol. 1989 May;63(5):1852-60
pubmed: 2522997
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 24;6(3):e18106
pubmed: 21455312
Virology. 1989 Mar;169(1):100-9
pubmed: 2922923
J Virol. 1990 Sep;64(9):4364-74
pubmed: 2143543
J Virol. 2013 Apr;87(8):4609-22
pubmed: 23408612
Antiviral Res. 2017 May;141:73-90
pubmed: 28202376
FEBS Lett. 2017 Aug;591(15):2338-2347
pubmed: 28675775
Arch Virol. 2015 Nov;160(11):2781-90
pubmed: 26303137
Virology. 1994 Feb 15;199(1):114-23
pubmed: 8116234
Antiviral Res. 2018 Sep;157:120-127
pubmed: 30057296
J Biol Chem. 1997 Dec 5;272(49):30715-23
pubmed: 9388208
J Biol Chem. 2000 Apr 7;275(14):9963-9
pubmed: 10744671
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1975;69(1):35-8
pubmed: 238314
Front Microbiol. 2016 Feb 19;7:190
pubmed: 26925054
J Mol Graph Model. 2015 Jul;60:24-33
pubmed: 26086900
Virol J. 2011 Oct 07;8:464
pubmed: 21978536