Refractive surgery beyond 2020.
Journal
Eye (London, England)
ISSN: 1476-5454
Titre abrégé: Eye (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8703986
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
08
05
2020
accepted:
08
07
2020
revised:
19
05
2020
pubmed:
28
7
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
26
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Refractive surgery refers to any procedure that corrects or minimizes refractive errors. Today, refractive surgery has evolved beyond the traditional laser refractive surgery, embodied by the popular laser in situ keratomileusis or 'LASIK'. New keratorefractive techniques such as small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) avoids corneal flap creation and uses a single laser device, while advances in surface ablation techniques have seen a resurgence in its popularity. Presbyopic treatment options have also expanded to include new ablation profiles, intracorneal implants, and phakic intraocular implants. With the improved safety and efficacy of refractive lens exchange, a wider variety of intraocular lens implants with advanced optics provide more options for refractive correction in carefully selected patients. In this review, we also discuss possible developments in refractive surgery beyond 2020, such as preoperative evaluation of refractive patients using machine learning and artificial intelligence, potential use of stromal lenticules harvested from SMILE for presbyopic treatments, and various advances in intraocular lens implants that may provide a closer to 'physiological correction' of refractive errors. 摘要: 屈光手术是指矫正或减少屈光不正度数的任何手术。如今, 屈光手术已经超越了传统的手术方式, 以流行的激光原位角膜磨镶术或”LASIK”为代表(laser in-situ keratomileusis, LASIK)。新的角膜屈光技术如小切口角膜基质透镜取出术 (small incision lenticule extraction, SMILE) 避免了角膜瓣的产生和使用单一激光设备, 另外, 表面消融技术的进步使其的流行度回升。老花眼治疗方案也已扩展到涉及新的消融方式, 角膜内植入物和人工晶状体植入物等方面。随着屈光镜片更换的安全性和功效的提高, 具有更先进光学技术的人工晶状体植入物为精心挑选的患者提供了更多屈光矫正手术的选择。在这篇综述中, 讨论了2020年以后屈光手术可能的发展, 例如机器学习和人工智能用于屈光手术患者的术前评估, 从SMILE中获得的角膜基质透镜在老视治疗中的潜在应用, 以及人工晶状体植入物的各种进步可以提供更接近屈光不正的“生理性的矫正”。.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(chi)
摘要: 屈光手术是指矫正或减少屈光不正度数的任何手术。如今, 屈光手术已经超越了传统的手术方式, 以流行的激光原位角膜磨镶术或”LASIK”为代表(laser in-situ keratomileusis, LASIK)。新的角膜屈光技术如小切口角膜基质透镜取出术 (small incision lenticule extraction, SMILE) 避免了角膜瓣的产生和使用单一激光设备, 另外, 表面消融技术的进步使其的流行度回升。老花眼治疗方案也已扩展到涉及新的消融方式, 角膜内植入物和人工晶状体植入物等方面。随着屈光镜片更换的安全性和功效的提高, 具有更先进光学技术的人工晶状体植入物为精心挑选的患者提供了更多屈光矫正手术的选择。在这篇综述中, 讨论了2020年以后屈光手术可能的发展, 例如机器学习和人工智能用于屈光手术患者的术前评估, 从SMILE中获得的角膜基质透镜在老视治疗中的潜在应用, 以及人工晶状体植入物的各种进步可以提供更接近屈光不正的“生理性的矫正”。.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32709958
doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-1096-5
pii: 10.1038/s41433-020-1096-5
pmc: PMC8027012
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
362-382Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Kim TI, Alio Del Barrio JL, Wilkins M, Cochener B, Ang M. Refractive surgery. Lancet. 2019;393:2085–98.
pubmed: 31106754
Sugar A, Hood CT, Mian SI. Patient-reported outcomes following LASIK: quality of Life in the PROWL Studies. JAMA. 2017;317:204–5.
pubmed: 28097345
Sugar A, Rapuano CJ, Culbertson WW, Huang D, Varley GA, Agapitos PJ, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:175–87.
pubmed: 11772601
Sandoval HP, Donnenfeld ED, Kohnen T, Lindstrom RL, Potvin R, Tremblay DM, et al. Modern laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:1224–34.
pubmed: 27531300
Eydelman M, Hilmantel G, Tarver ME, Hofmeister EM, May J, Hammel K, et al. Symptoms and satisfaction of patients in the patient-reported outcomes with laser in situ keratomileusis (PROWL) studies. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135:13–22.
pubmed: 27893066
Ang M, Mehta JS, Chan C, Htoon HM, Koh JC, Tan DT. Refractive lenticule extraction: transition and comparison of 3 surgical techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1415–24.
pubmed: 25135532
Ang M, Tan D, Mehta JS. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK): study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial. Trials. 2012;13:75.
pubmed: 22647480
pmcid: 3404906
Mi H, Tan N, Ang M, Htoon HM, Mehta JS. Comparison of anterior and posterior topographic analysis between 3 imaging systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2533–45.
pubmed: 26703504
Chan C, Ang M, Saad A, Chua D, Mejia M, Lim L, et al. Validation of an objective scoring system for forme fruste keratoconus detection and post-LASIK ectasia risk assessment in Asian eyes. Cornea. 2015;34:996–1004.
pubmed: 26165793
Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Bons JP, Hossain A, Elsheikh A, Vinciguerra R, et al. Introduction of two novel stiffness parameters and interpretation of air puff-induced biomechanical deformation parameters with a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:266–73.
pubmed: 28407167
Ambrosio R Jr., Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, Salomao MQ, Buhren J, Roberts CJ, et al. Integration of Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments for enhancing ectasia detection. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:434–43.
pubmed: 28681902
Ang M, Baskaran M, Werkmeister RM, Chua J, Schmidl D, Aranha Dos Santos V, et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018;66:132–56.
pubmed: 29635068
Ang M, Chong W, Huang H, Tay WT, Wong TY, He MG, et al. Comparison of anterior segment optical tomography parameters measured using a semi-automatic software to standard clinical instruments. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e65559.
pubmed: 23750265
pmcid: 3672133
Sikorski BL, Suchon P. OCT biometry (B-OCT): a new method for measuring ocular axial dimensions. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:9192456.
pubmed: 31511790
pmcid: 6710804
Silverman RH, Urs R, Roychoudhury A, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Reinstein DZ. Epithelial remodeling as basis for machine-based identification of keratoconus. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:1580–7.
Reinstein DZ, Srivannaboon S, Gobbe M, Archer TJ, Silverman RH, Sutton H, et al. Epithelial thickness profile changes induced by myopic LASIK as measured by Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2009;25:444–50.
pubmed: 19507797
pmcid: 2695568
Gatinel D, Azar DT, Dumas L, Malet J. Effect of anterior corneal surface asphericity modification on fourth-order zernike spherical aberrations. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:708–15.
pubmed: 25291755
Amigo A, Martinez-Sorribes P, Recuerda M. Refractive changes induced by spherical aberration in laser correction procedures: an adaptive optics study. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:470–4.
pubmed: 28681906
Gatinel D, Malet J, Dumas L. Polynomial decomposition method for ocular wavefront analysis. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2018;35:2035–45.
pubmed: 30645293
Cabot F, Saad A, McAlinden C, Haddad NM, Grise-Dulac A, Gatinel D. Objective assessment of crystalline lens opacity level by measuring ocular light scattering with a double-pass system. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155:629–35. 635 e621-2.
pubmed: 23317652
Artal P, Benito A, Perez GM, Alcon E, De Casas A, Pujol J, et al. An objective scatter index based on double-pass retinal images of a point source to classify cataracts. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e16823.
pubmed: 21326868
pmcid: 3033912
Panthier C, de Wazieres A, Rouger H, Moran S, Saad A, Gatinel D. Average lens density quantification with swept-source optical coherence tomography: optimized, automated cataract grading technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45:1746–52.
pubmed: 31856985
Accardo PA, Pensiero S. Neural network-based system for early keratoconus detection from corneal topography. J Biomed Inf. 2002;35:151–9.
Kovacs I, Mihaltz K, Kranitz K, Juhasz E, Takacs A, Dienes L, et al. Accuracy of machine learning classifiers using bilateral data from a Scheimpflug camera for identifying eyes with preclinical signs of keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:275–83.
pubmed: 27026453
Arbelaez MC, Versaci F, Vestri G, Barboni P, Savini G. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:2231–8.
pubmed: 22892148
Smadja D, Touboul D, Cohen A, Doveh E, Santhiago MR, Mello GR, et al. Detection of subclinical keratoconus using an automated decision tree classification. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:237–46 e231.
pubmed: 23746611
Yousefi S, Yousefi E, Takahashi H, Hayashi T, Tampo H, Inoda S, et al. Keratoconus severity identification using unsupervised machine learning. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0205998.
pubmed: 30399144
pmcid: 6219768
Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:169–78.
pubmed: 28951074
Shammas HJ, Chan S. Precision of biometry, keratometry, and refractive measurements with a partial coherence interferometry-keratometry device. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1474–8.
pubmed: 20692557
Shajari M, Kolb CM, Petermann K, Bohm M, Herzog M, de’Lorenzo N, et al. Comparison of 9 modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas for a quadrifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44:942–8.
pubmed: 30115296
Connell BJ, Kane JX. Comparison of the Kane formula with existing formulas for intraocular lens power selection. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2019;4:e000251.
pubmed: 31179396
pmcid: 6528763
Kanellopoulos AJ, Pallikaris IG, Donnenfeld ED, Detorakis S, Koufala K, Perry HD. Comparison of corneal sensation following photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:34–8.
pubmed: 9100105
Amm M, Wetzel W, Winter M, Uthoff D, Duncker GI. Histopathological comparison of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis in rabbits. J Refract Surg. 1996;12:758–66.
pubmed: 8970022
Azar DT, Ang RT, Lee JB, Kato T, Chen CC, Jain S, et al. Laser subepithelial keratomileusis: electron microscopy and visual outcomes of flap photorefractive keratectomy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001;12:323–8.
pubmed: 11507348
Chen CC, Chang JH, Lee JB, Javier J, Azar DT. Human corneal epithelial cell viability and morphology after dilute alcohol exposure. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2593–602.
Fadlallah A, Fahed D, Khalil K, Dunia I, Menassa J, El Rami H, et al. Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: clinical results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:1852–7.
pubmed: 21840678
Antonios R, Abdul Fattah M, Arba Mosquera S, Abiad BH, Sleiman K, Awwad ST. Single-step transepithelial versus alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy in the treatment of high myopia: a comparative evaluation over 12 months. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:1106–12.
pubmed: 27941045
Wen D, McAlinden C, Flitcroft I, Tu R, Wang Q, Alio J, et al. Postoperative efficacy, predictability, safety, and visual quality of laser corneal refractive surgery: a network meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;178:65–78.
pubmed: 28336402
Sanchez P, Moutsouris K, Pandolfi A. Biomechanical and optical behavior of human corneas before and after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:905–17.
pubmed: 24857438
Vestergaard AH. Past and present of corneal refractive surgery: a retrospective study of long-term results after photorefractive keratectomy and a prospective study of refractive lenticule extraction. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;2:1–21. 92 Thesis.
Munnerlyn CR, Koons SJ, Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988;14:46–52.
pubmed: 3339547
Na KS, Chung SH, Kim JK, Jang EJ, Lee NR, Joo CK. Comparison of LASIK and surface ablation by using propensity score analysis: a multicenter study in Korea. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:7116–21.
Wachtlin J, Langenbeck K, Schrunder S, Zhang EP, Hoffmann F. Immunohistology of corneal wound healing after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 1999;15:451–8.
pubmed: 10445718
Kim TI, Pak JH, Lee SY, Tchah H. Mitomycin C-induced reduction of keratocytes and fibroblasts after photorefractive keratectomy. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2978–84.
Lee DH, Chung HS, Jeon YC, Boo SD, Yoon YD, Kim JG. Photorefractive keratectomy with intraoperative mitomycin-C application. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:2293–8.
pubmed: 16473220
Faktorovich EG, Melwani K. Efficacy and safety of pain relief medications after photorefractive keratectomy: review of prospective randomized trials. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1716–30.
pubmed: 25263042
Shemesh G, Dotan G, Lipshitz I. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using three different microkeratomes. J Refract Sur. 2002;18:S347–351.
Santhiago MR, Kara-Junior N, Waring GOt. Microkeratome versus femtosecond flaps: accuracy and complications. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25:270–4.
pubmed: 24837579
Solomon KD, Donnenfeld E, Sandoval HP, Al Sarraf O, Kasper TJ, Holzer MP, et al. Flap thickness accuracy: comparison of 6 microkeratome models. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:964–77.
pubmed: 15130631
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Accuracy and reproducibility of Cap thickness in small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:810–5.
pubmed: 24168787
Zhai CB, Tian L, Zhou YH, Zhang QW, Zhang J. Comparison of the flaps made by femtosecond laser and automated keratomes for sub-bowman keratomileusis. Chin Med J. 2013;126:2440–4.
pubmed: 23823815
Zhao LQ, Wei RL, Cheng JW, Li Y, Cai JP, Ma XY. Meta-analysis: clinical outcomes of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy in myopia. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1912–22.
pubmed: 20709406
Wallerstein A, Jackson WB, Chambers J, Moezzi AM, Lin H, Simmons PA. Management of post-LASIK dry eye: a multicenter randomized comparison of a new multi-ingredient artificial tear to carboxymethylcellulose. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:839–48.
pubmed: 29765198
pmcid: 5944453
Segev F, Mimouni M, Sela T, Munzer G, Kaiserman I. Risk factors for sporadic diffuse lamellar keratitis after microkeratome laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis: a retrospective large database analysis. Cornea. 2018;37:1124–9.
pubmed: 29923860
Yesilirmak N, Chhadva P, Cabot F, Galor A, Yoo SH. Post-laser in situ keratomileusis epithelial ingrowth: treatment, recurrence, and long-term results. Cornea. 2018;37:1517–21.
pubmed: 30222719
pmcid: 6218310
Ayala MJ, Alio JL, Mulet ME, De La Hoz F. Treatment of laser in situ keratomileusis interface epithelial ingrowth with neodymium:yytrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:630–4.
pubmed: 18242573
Bohac M, Koncarevic M, Pasalic A, Biscevic A, Merlak M, Gabric N, et al. Incidence and clinical characteristics of post LASIK ectasia: a review of over 30,000 LASIK cases. Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33:869–77.
pubmed: 30359155
Seiler T, Genth U, Holschbach A, Derse M. Aspheric photorefractive keratectomy with excimer laser. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9:166–72.
pubmed: 8343437
O’Brart DP, Corbett MC, Lohmann CP, Kerr Muir MG, Marshall J. The effects of ablation diameter on the outcome of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:438–43.
pubmed: 7710392
Kalski RS, Sutton G, Bin Y, Lawless MA, Rogers C. Comparison of 5-mm and 6-mm ablation zones in photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Refract Surg. 1996;12:61–7.
pubmed: 8963819
Buhren J, Pesudovs K, Martin T, Strenger A, Yoon G, Kohnen T. Comparison of optical quality metrics to predict subjective quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:846–5.
pubmed: 19393883
Drum BA. Aberration analyses needed for FDA evaluation of safety and effectiveness of wavefront-guided refractive surgical devices. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:S588–91.
pubmed: 14518749
Pesudovs K. Wavefront aberration outcomes of LASIK for high myopia and high hyperopia. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:S508–12.
pubmed: 16209452
Myrowitz EH, Chuck RS. A comparison of wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided ablations. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20:247–50.
pubmed: 19537362
Jun I, Kang DS, Tan J, Choi JY, Heo W, Kim JY, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between wavefront-optimized versus corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy for myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:174–82.
pubmed: 28366363
Lee WS, Manche EE. Comparison of simulated keratometric changes following wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:613–9.
pubmed: 29636597
pmcid: 5880184
Moshirfar M, Shah TJ, Skanchy DF, Linn SH, Kang P, Durrie DS. Comparison and analysis of FDA reported visual outcomes of the three latest platforms for LASIK: wavefront guided Visx iDesign, topography guided WaveLight Allegro Contoura, and topography guided Nidek EC-5000 CATz. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:135–47.
pubmed: 28115827
pmcid: 5221655
Schallhorn SC, Farjo AA, Huang D, Boxer Wachler BS, Trattler WB, Tanzer DJ, et al. Wavefront-guided LASIK for the correction of primary myopia and astigmatism a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1249–61.
pubmed: 18598819
Smadja D, Reggiani-Mello G, Santhiago MR, Krueger RR. Wavefront ablation profiles in refractive surgery: description, results, and limitations. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:224–32.
pubmed: 22373035
Goldberg DB. Laser in situ keratomileusis monovision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1449–55.
pubmed: 11566531
Miranda D, Krueger RR. Monovision laser in situ keratomileusis for pre-presbyopic and presbyopic patients. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:325–8.
pubmed: 15307393
Ayoubi MG, Leccisotti A, Goodall EA, McGilligan VE, Moore TC. Femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis versus conductive keratoplasty to obtain monovision in patients with emmetropic presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:997–1002.
pubmed: 20494773
Fawcett SL, Herman WK, Alfieri CD, Castleberry KA, Parks MM, Birch EE. Stereoacuity and foveal fusion in adults with long-standing surgical monovision. J Aapos. 2001;5:342–7.
pubmed: 11753252
Kato S, Ito M, Shimizu K, Kamiya K. Etiology and outcomes of secondary surgical intervention for dissatisfied patients after pseudophakic monovision. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38:1003–9.
pubmed: 28523525
Holland D. PresbyLASIK treatment for simultaneous correction of presbyopia and ametropia: development to PresbyMAX hybrid at the Augenklinik Bellevue. ESCRS. 2014.
Chan TC, Kwok PS, Jhanji V, Woo VC, Ng AL. Presbyopic correction using monocular Bi-aspheric ablation profile (PresbyMAX) in hyperopic eyes: 1-year outcomes. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:37–43.
pubmed: 28068445
Luger MH, McAlinden C, Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Verma S, Arba Mosquera S. Presbyopic LASIK using hybrid bi-aspheric micro-monovision ablation profile for presbyopic corneal treatments. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160:493–505.
pubmed: 26025425
Vargas-Fragoso V, Alio JL. Corneal compensation of presbyopia: PresbyLASIK: an updated review. Eye Vis. 2017;4:11.
Rocha KM, Vabre L, Chateau N, Krueger RR. Expanding depth of focus by modifying higher-order aberrations induced by an adaptive optics visual simulator. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1885–92.
pubmed: 19878820
Benard Y, Lopez-Gil N, Legras R. Optimizing the subjective depth-of-focus with combinations of fourth- and sixth-order spherical aberration. Vis Res. 2011;51:2471–7.
pubmed: 22019797
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Laser blended vision for presbyopia correction. In: Pallikaris IG, Plainis S, Charman WN, (eds). Presbyopia: origins, effects and treatment. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2012.
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. LASIK for myopic astigmatism and presbyopia using non-linear aspheric micro-monovision with the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL 80 platform. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:23–37.
pubmed: 20205360
Reinstein DZ, Couch DG, Archer TJ. LASIK for hyperopic astigmatism and presbyopia using Micro-monovision With the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL80. J Refract Surg. 2009;25:37–58.
pubmed: 19244952
Evans BJ. Monovision: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27:417–39.
pubmed: 17718882
Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. LASIK for the correction of presbyopia in emmetropic patients using aspheric ablation profiles and a micro-monovision protocol with the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL80 and VisuMax. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:531–41.
pubmed: 22869232
Vestergaard AH, Grauslund J, Ivarsen AR, Hjortdal JO. Efficacy, safety, predictability, contrast sensitivity, and aberrations after femtosecond laser lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:403–11.
pubmed: 24480564
Sekundo W, Gertnere J, Bertelmann T, Solomatin I. One-year refractive results, contrast sensitivity, high-order aberrations and complications after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252:837–43.
pubmed: 24647595
Moshirfar M, McCaughey MV, Reinstein DZ, Shah R, Santiago-Caban L, Fenzl CR. Small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:652–65.
pubmed: 25804585
Denoyer A, Landman E, Trinh L, Faure JF, Auclin F, Baudouin C. Dry eye disease after refractive surgery: comparative outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:669–76.
pubmed: 25458707
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Bartoli E. Corneal sensitivity after small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1580–7.
pubmed: 26432113
Randleman JB, Dawson DG, Grossniklaus HE, McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF. Depth-dependent cohesive tensile strength in human donor corneas: implications for refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:S85–9.
pubmed: 18269156
Scarcelli G, Pineda R, Yun SH. Brillouin optical microscopy for corneal biomechanics. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:185–90.
Petsche SJ, Chernyak D, Martiz J, Levenston ME, Pinsky PM. Depth-dependent transverse shear properties of the human corneal stroma. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:873–80.
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Randleman JB. Mathematical model to compare the relative tensile strength of the cornea after PRK, LASIK, and small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:454–60.
pubmed: 23820227
Seven I, Vahdati A, Pedersen IB, Vestergaard A, Hjortdal J, Roberts CJ, et al. Contralateral eye comparison of SMILE and Flap-Based corneal refractive surgery: computational analysis of biomechanical impact. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:444–53.
pubmed: 28681903
pmcid: 6041122
Sinha Roy A, Dupps WJ Jr., Roberts CJ. Comparison of biomechanical effects of small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis: finite-element analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:971–80.
pubmed: 24857440
Spiru B, Kling S, Hafezi F, Sekundo W. Biomechanical differences between femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx) and small incision lenticule extraction (SmILE) tested by 2D-extensometry in ex vivo porcine eyes. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:2591–5.
Pedersen IB, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Changes in astigmatism, densitometry, and aberrations after SMILE for low to high myopic astigmatism: a 12-month prospective study. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:11–7.
pubmed: 28068441
Damgaard IB, Ang M, Mahmoud AM, Farook M, Roberts CJ, Mehta JS. Functional optical zone and centration following SMILE and LASIK: a prospective, randomized, contralateral Eye Study. J Refract Surg. 2019;35:230–7.
pubmed: 30984980
Han T, Shang J, Zhou X, Xu Y, Ang M, Zhou X. Refractive outcomes comparing small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46:419–27.
Ji YW, Kang DSY, Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Choi JY, Kim EK, et al. Effect of lowering laser energy on the surface roughness of human corneal lenticules in small-incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:617–24.
pubmed: 28880337
Ji YW, Kim M, Yong Kang DS, Reinstein D, Archer T, Choi JY, et al. Lower laser energy levels lead to better visual recovery after small-incision lenticule extraction: prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;179:159–70.
pubmed: 28499707
Donate D, Thaeron R. Lower energy levels improve visual recovery in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). J Refract Surg. 2016;32:636–42.
pubmed: 27598734
Li L, Schallhorn JM, Ma J, Cui T, Wang Y. Energy setting and visual outcomes in SMILE: a retrospective Cohort Study. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:11–6.
pubmed: 29315436
Shen Z, Shi K, Yu Y, Yu X, Lin Y, Yao K. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0158176.
pubmed: 27367803
pmcid: 4930219
Zhang Y, Shen Q, Jia Y, Zhou D, Zhou J. Clinical outcomes of SMILE and FS-LASIK used to treat myopia: a meta-analysis. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:256–65.
pubmed: 27070233
Ang M, Farook M, Htoon HM, Mehta JS. Randomized clinical trial comparing femtosecond LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction. Ophthalmology. 2020;127:724–30.
Ang M, Ho H, Fenwick E, Lamoureux E, Htoon HM, Koh J, et al. Vision-related quality of life and visual outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2136–44.
pubmed: 26703289
Ang M, Farook M, Htoon HM, Tan D, Mehta JS. Simulated night vision after small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:1173–80.
pubmed: 27531294
Damgaard IB, Ang M, Farook M, Htoon HM, Mehta JS. Intraoperative patient experience and postoperative visual quality after SMILE and LASIK in a randomized, paired-eye, controlled study. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:92–9.
pubmed: 29425387
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Vida RS, Carp GI. Suction stability management in small incision lenticule extraction: incidence and outcomes of suction loss in 4000 consecutive procedures. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98:e72–e80.
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Vida RS, Carp GI. Suction stability management in SMILE: development of a decision tree for managing eye movements and suction loss. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:809–16.
pubmed: 30540363
Ang M, Chaurasia SS, Angunawela RI, Poh R, Riau A, Tan D, et al. Femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx): clinical results, interface evaluation, and intraocular pressure variation. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:1414–21.
Reinstein DZ, Stuart AJ, Vida RS, Archer TJ, Carp GI. Incidence and outcomes of sterile multifocal inflammatory keratitis and diffuse lamellar keratitis after SMILE. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:751–9.
pubmed: 30428095
Siedlecki J, Luft N, Mayer WJ, Siedlecki M, Kook D, Meyer B, et al. CIRCLE enhancement after myopic SMILE. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:304–9.
pubmed: 29738585
Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Vida RS. Outcomes of re-treatment by LASIK After SMILE. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:578–88.
pubmed: 30199561
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Carp GI. The surgeon’s guide to small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Thorofare, New Jersey: SLACK Incorporated; 2018.
Ganesh S, Gupta R. Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:590–6.
pubmed: 25250415
Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in low myopia. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:812–8.
pubmed: 25437479
Pradhan KR, Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Dhungana P. Quality control outcomes analysis of small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia by a novice surgeon at the first refractive surgery unit in Nepal during the first 2 years of operation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:267–74.
pubmed: 27026452
Jacob S, Kumar DA, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Aravind R, Saijimol AI. Preliminary evidence of successful near vision enhancement with a new technique: PrEsbyopic Allogenic Refractive Lenticule (PEARL) Corneal Inlay Using a SMILE Lenticule. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:224–9.
pubmed: 28407161
Li M, Li M, Sun L, Ni K, Zhou X. Predictive formula for refraction of autologous lenticule implantation for hyperopia correction. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:827–33.
pubmed: 29227511
Pradhan KR, Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Gurung R. Femtosecond laser-assisted keyhole endokeratophakia: correction of hyperopia by implantation of an allogeneic lenticule obtained by SMILE from a myopic donor. J Refractive Surg. 2013;29:777–82.
Alio Del Barrio JL, El Zarif M, Azaar A, Makdissy N, Khalil C, Harb W, et al. Corneal stroma enhancement with decellularized stromal laminas with or without stem cell recellularization for advanced keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;186:47–58.
pubmed: 29103962
Mastropasqua L, Nubile M, Salgari N, Mastropasqua R. Femtosecond laser-assisted stromal lenticule addition keratoplasty for the treatment of advanced keratoconus: a Preliminary Study. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:36–44.
pubmed: 29315440
Alio del Barrio JL, Chiesa M, Garagorri N, Garcia-Urquia N, Fernandez-Delgado J, Bataille L, et al. Acellular human corneal matrix sheets seeded with human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells integrate functionally in an experimental animal model. Exp Eye Res. 2015;132:91–100.
pubmed: 25625506
Liu YC, Teo EPW, Ang HP, Seah XY, Lwin NC, Yam GHF, et al. Biological corneal inlay for presbyopia derived from small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Sci Rep. 2018;8:1831.
pubmed: 29382905
pmcid: 5789881
Liu R, Zhao J, Xu Y, Li M, Niu L, Liu H, et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal small incision allogenic intrastromal lenticule implantation in monkeys: a Pilot Study. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:3715–20.
Damgaard IB, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Biological lenticule implantation for correction of hyperopia: an ex vivo study in human corneas. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:245–52.
pubmed: 29634839
Barraquer JI. Modification of refraction by means of intracorneal inclusions. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1966;6:53–78.
pubmed: 5334910
Barraquer JI. Keratophakia. Trans ophthalmological societies U Kingd. 1972;92:499–516.
Garza EB, Gomez S, Chayet A, Dishler J. One-year safety and efficacy results of a hydrogel inlay to improve near vision in patients with emmetropic presbyopia. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:166–72.
pubmed: 23446012
Malandrini A, Martone G, Menabuoni L, Catanese AM, Tosi GM, Balestrazzi A, et al. Bifocal refractive corneal inlay implantation to improve near vision in emmetropic presbyopic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1962–72.
pubmed: 26603405
Yilmaz OF, Bayraktar S, Agca A, Yilmaz B, McDonald MB, van de Pol C. Intracorneal inlay for the surgical correction of presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1921–7.
pubmed: 19006739
Mulet ME, Alio JL, Knorz MC. Hydrogel intracorneal inlays for the correction of hyperopia: outcomes and complications after 5 years of follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1455–60. 1460.e1451.
pubmed: 19651310
Vega-Estrada A, Alio JL. The use of intracorneal ring segments in keratoconus. Eye Vis. 2016;3:8.
Vega-Estrada A, Alio JL, Brenner LF, Javaloy J, Plaza Puche AB, Barraquer RI, et al. Outcome analysis of intracorneal ring segments for the treatment of keratoconus based on visual, refractive, and aberrometric impairment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155:575–84.e571.
pubmed: 23218702
Lindstrom RL, Macrae SM, Pepose JS, Hoopes PC Sr. Corneal inlays for presbyopia correction. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24:281–7.
pubmed: 23703461
Konstantopoulos A, Mehta JS. Surgical compensation of presbyopia with corneal inlays. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015;12:341–52.
pubmed: 25652889
Arlt E, Krall E, Moussa S, Grabner G, Dexl A. Implantable inlay devices for presbyopia: the evidence to date. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:129–37.
pubmed: 25609913
pmcid: 4298303
Whitman J, Dougherty PJ, Parkhurst GD, Olkowski J, Slade SG, Hovanesian J, et al. Treatment of presbyopia in emmetropes using a shape-changing corneal inlay: one-year clinical outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:466–75.
pubmed: 26804761
Yoo A, Kim JY, Kim MJ, Tchah H. Hydrogel inlay for presbyopia: objective and subjective visual outcomes. J Refract Surg. 2015;31:454–60.
pubmed: 26158925
Limnopoulou AN, Bouzoukis DI, Kymionis GD, Panagopoulou SI, Plainis S, Pallikaris AI, et al. Visual outcomes and safety of a refractive corneal inlay for presbyopia using femtosecond laser. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:12–8.
pubmed: 23311737
Baily C, Kohnen T, O’Keefe M. Preloaded refractive-addition corneal inlay to compensate for presbyopia implanted using a femtosecond laser: one-year visual outcomes and safety. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1341–8.
pubmed: 25088635
Vukich JA, Durrie DS, Pepose JS, Thompson V, van de Pol C, Lin L. Evaluation of the small-aperture intracorneal inlay: Three-year results from the cohort of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44:541–56.
Chen LJ, Chang YJ, Kuo JC, Rajagopal R, Azar DT. Metaanalysis of cataract development after phakic intraocular lens surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1181–200.
pubmed: 18571089
Huang D, Schallhorn SC, Sugar A, Farjo AA, Majmudar PA, Trattler WB, et al. Phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of myopia: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2244–58.
pubmed: 19883852
Barsam A, Allan BD. Excimer laser refractive surgery versus phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of moderate to high myopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD007679. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007679.pub4 .
Nanavaty MA, Daya SM. Refractive lens exchange versus phakic intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23:54–61.
pubmed: 22081028
Pop M, Payette Y. Refractive lens exchange versus iris-claw Artisan phakic intraocular lens for hyperopia. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:20–4.
pubmed: 14763466
Packer M. Meta-analysis and review: effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1059–77.
pubmed: 27354760
pmcid: 4907705
Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Kobashi H. Long-term comparison of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole (Hole ICL and Conventional ICL) implantation for moderate to high myopia and myopic astigmatism: consort-compliant article. Medicine. 2016;95:e3270.
pubmed: 27057883
pmcid: 4998799
Alio JL, Mulet ME. Presbyopia correction with an anterior chamber phakic multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1368–74.
pubmed: 16023215
Alio JL, Grzybowski A, El Aswad A, Romaniuk D. Refractive lens exchange. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014;59:579–98.
pubmed: 25127929
Alio JL, Grzybowski A, Romaniuk D. Refractive lens exchange in modern practice: when and when not to do it? Eye Vis. 2014;1:10.
Liu YC, Wilkins M, Kim T, Malyugin B, Mehta JS. Cataracts. Lancet. 2017;390:600–12.
pubmed: 28242111
Westin O, Koskela T, Behndig A. Epidemiology and outcomes in refractive lens exchange surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93:41–5.
pubmed: 24889146
Creuzot-Garcher C, Benzenine E, Mariet AS, de Lazzer A, Chiquet C, Bron AM, et al. Incidence of acute postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: a nationwide study in France from 2005 to 2014. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1414–20.
pubmed: 26992840
Jabbarvand M, Hashemian H, Khodaparast M, Jouhari M, Tabatabaei A, Rezaei S. Endophthalmitis occurring after cataract surgery: outcomes of more than 480 000 cataract surgeries, epidemiologic features, and risk factors. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:295–301.
pubmed: 26704882
Behndig A, Montan P, Stenevi U, Kugelberg M, Lundstrom M. One million cataract surgeries: Swedish National Cataract Register 1992-2009. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:1539–45.
pubmed: 21782099
Jaycock P, Johnston RL, Taylor H, Adams M, Tole DM, Galloway P, et al. The Cataract National Dataset electronic multi-centre audit of 55,567 operations: updating benchmark standards of care in the United Kingdom and internationally. Eye. 2009;23:38–49.
pubmed: 18034196
Lichtinger A, Rootman DS. Intraocular lenses for presbyopia correction: past, present, and future. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23:40–6.
pubmed: 22081027
Montes-Mico R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Charman WN, Cervino A, Alfonso JF, Fernandez-Vega L. Optical quality of the eye after lens replacement with a pseudoaccommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:763–8.
pubmed: 18471630
Alio JL, Pinero DP, Plaza-Puche AB, Chan MJ. Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:241–50.
pubmed: 21241905
Yoon CH, Shin IS, Kim MK. Trifocal versus bifocal diffractive intraocular lens implantation after cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange: a meta-analysis. J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33:e275.
pubmed: 30369857
pmcid: 6200906
Rosen E, Alio JL, Dick HB, Dell S, Slade S. Efficacy and safety of multifocal intraocular lenses following cataract and refractive lens exchange: metaanalysis of peer-reviewed publications. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:310–28.
pubmed: 27026457
Alio JL. Presbyopic lenses: evidence, masquerade news, and fake news. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2019;8:273–4.
Rocha KM. Extended depth of focus IOLs: the next chapter in refractive technology? J Refract Surg. 2017;33:146–9.
pubmed: 28264127
Tarib I, Diakonis VF, Breyer D, Hohn F, Hahn U, Kretz FTA. Outcomes of combining a trifocal and a low-addition bifocal intraocular lens in patients seeking spectacle independence at all distances. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45:620–9.
pubmed: 31030777
Dick HB, Piovella M, Vukich J, Vilupuru S, Lin L, Clinical I. Prospective multicenter trial of a small-aperture intraocular lens in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:956–68.
pubmed: 28823444
Liang YL, Jia SB. Clinical application of accommodating intraocular lens. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11:1028–37.
pubmed: 29977819
pmcid: 6010372
Alio JL, Alio Del Barrio JL, Vega-Estrada A. Accommodative intraocular lenses: where are we and where we are going. Eye Vis. 2017;4:16.
Ale JB, Manns F, Ho A. Paraxial analysis of the depth of field of a pseudophakic eye with accommodating intraocular lens. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88:789–94.
pubmed: 21516047
pmcid: 3125438
Alio JL, Ben-Nun J. Study of the force dynamics at the capsular interface related to ciliary body stimulation in a primate model. J Refract Surg. 2015;31:124–8.
pubmed: 25735046
Alio JL, Ben-nun J, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Plaza AB. Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1671–8.
pubmed: 19781458
Alio JL, Simonov AN, Romero D, Angelov A, Angelov Y, van Lawick W, et al. Analysis of accommodative performance of a new accommodative intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:78–83.
pubmed: 29425385
Alio JL, Simonov A, Plaza-Puche AB, Angelov A, Angelov Y, van Lawick W, et al. Visual outcomes and accommodative response of the lumina accommodative intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;164:37–48.
pubmed: 26829595
Sheppard AL, Bashir A, Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN. Accommodating intraocular lenses: a review of design concepts, usage and assessment methods. Clin Exp Optom. 2010;93:441–52.
pubmed: 21182659
Solomon KD, Fernandez de Castro LE, Sandoval HP, Biber JM, Groat B, Neff KD, et al. LASIK world literature review: quality of life and patient satisfaction. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:691–701.
pubmed: 19344821
Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Combined laser in situ keratomileusis and prophylactic high-fluence corneal collagen crosslinking for high myopia: two-year safety and efficacy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1426–33.
pubmed: 26287881
Tomita M, Yoshida Y, Yamamoto Y, Mita M, Waring Gt. In vivo confocal laser microscopy of morphologic changes after simultaneous LASIK and accelerated collagen crosslinking for myopia: one-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:981–90.
pubmed: 24857441
Cheema AS, Mozayan A, Channa P. Corneal collagen crosslinking in refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23:251–6.
pubmed: 22569468
Ewe SY, Abell RG, Vote BJ. Femtosecond laser-assisted versus phacoemulsification for cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation: clinical outcomes review. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29:54–60.
pubmed: 28914688
Ding L, Knox WH, Buhren J, Nagy LJ, Huxlin KR. Intratissue refractive index shaping (IRIS) of the cornea and lens using a low-pulse-energy femtosecond laser oscillator. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:5332–9.
Whitman J, Hovanesian J, Steinert RF, Koch D, Potvin R. Through-focus performance with a corneal shape-changing inlay: One-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:965–71.
pubmed: 27492093
Beer SMC, Werner L, Nakano EM, Santos RT, Hirai F, Nitschke EJ, et al. A 3-year follow-up study of a new corneal inlay: clinical results and outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104:723–8.
pubmed: 31446390
Seyeddain O, Bachernegg A, Riha W, Rückl T, Reitsamer H, Grabner G, et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted small-aperture corneal inlay implantation for corneal compensation of presbyopia: two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:234–41.
pubmed: 23245507