Assessment of radiographic sacroiliitis in anteroposterior lumbar vs conventional pelvic radiographs in axial spondyloarthritis.
Adult
Cohort Studies
Correlation of Data
Disease Progression
Female
Humans
Lumbosacral Region
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Observer Variation
Pelvic Bones
/ diagnostic imaging
Radiography
/ statistics & numerical data
Reproducibility of Results
Sacroiliac Joint
/ diagnostic imaging
Sacroiliitis
/ diagnostic imaging
Spondylarthritis
/ diagnostic imaging
ankylosing spondylitis
axial spondyloarthritis
radiograph
sacroiliac joint
sacroiliitis
Journal
Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1462-0332
Titre abrégé: Rheumatology (Oxford)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 01 2021
05 01 2021
Historique:
received:
31
10
2019
revised:
21
04
2020
pubmed:
28
7
2020
medline:
17
4
2021
entrez:
26
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim was to investigate the reliability and validity of radiographic sacroiliitis assessment in anteroposterior (AP) lumbar radiographs compared with conventional pelvic radiographs in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Patients from the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort were selected based on the availability of pelvic and AP lumbar radiographs with visible SI joints at baseline and year 2. Two readers scored the images independently in a random order according to the modified New York criteria. The sacroiliitis sum score was calculated as the mean of both readers. Patients were classified as radiographic (r-)axSpA if radiographic sacroiliitis of grade ≥2 bilaterally or grade ≥3 unilaterally was present in the opinion of both readers and as non-radiographic (nr-)axSpA otherwise. The reliability and validity of sacroiliitis assessment in AP lumbar radiographs was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), absolute agreement and κ statistics. A total of 226 sets of radiographs were scored from 113 patients included in the study. The ICC for the sacroiliitis sum score was 0.91 at both baseline and year 2. A total of 62 (54.9%) and 55 (48.7%) patients were classified as r-axSpA at baseline and 65 (57.5%) and 60 (53.1%) patients at year 2 based on evaluation of pelvic and AP lumbar radiographs, respectively. The absolute agreement between the methods on the classification was 84.9 and 85.0% at baseline and year 2, respectively, with the κ of 0.70 at both time points. Radiographic sacroiliitis can be assessed in AP lumbar radiographs with a similar reliability to conventional pelvic radiographs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32710108
pii: 5876127
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa260
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
269-276Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.