Stimulus sampling and other recommendations for assessing domain-general processes of attitude formation through exploration: Reply to Ruisch, Shook, and Fazio (2020).
attitude formation
exploration
political ideology
stimulus sampling
Journal
British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)
ISSN: 2044-8295
Titre abrégé: Br J Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373124
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
13
06
2020
revised:
13
07
2020
pubmed:
28
7
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
entrez:
26
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In response to Ruisch et al., 2020, British Journal of Psychology, we propose that the assessment of domain-general ideological differences requires systematic stimulus sampling. We argue that there is currently no evidence that the 'neutral' BeanFest assesses domain-general ideological differences and that Ruisch et al., 2020, British Journal of Psychology findings do not address the mechanism(s) underlying our findings.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
362-365Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.
Références
Bahník, S., & Vranka, M. A. (2017). If it’s difficult to pronounce, it might not be risky: The effect of fluency on judgment of risk does not generalize to new stimuli. Psychological Science, 28, 427-36.
Elad-Strenger, J., Proch, J., & Kessler, T. (2020). Is disgust a “conservative” emotion? Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 46, 896-912. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219880191
Fazio, R. H., Pietri, E. S., Rocklage, M. D., & Shook, N. J. (2015). Positive versus negative valence: Asymmetries in attitude formation and generalization as fundamental individual differences. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 97-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2014.09.002
Fiagbenu, M. E., Proch, J., & Kessler, T. (2019). Of deadly beans and risky stocks: Political ideology and attitude formation via exploration depend on the nature of the attitude stimuli. British Journal of Psychology [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12430
Fiedler, K. (1996). Explaining and simulating judgment biases as an aggregation phenomenon in probabilistic, multiple-cue environments. Psychological Review, 103(1), 193-214.
Gigerenzer, G. (1991). How to make cognitive illusions disappear. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 83-115.
Gray, K., & Keeney, J. E. (2015). Impure or just weird? Scenario sampling bias raises questions about the foundation of morality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 859-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615592241
Lagnado, D. A., Newell, B. R., Kahan, S., & Shanks, D. R. (2006). Insight and strategy in multiple cue learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 162-83.
Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014). Unconscious influences on decision making: a critical review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12003214
Proch, J., Elad-Strenger, J., & Kessler, T. (2018). Liberalism and conservatism, for a change! Rethinking the association between political orientation and relation to societal change. Political Psychology, 40, 877-903. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12559
Ruisch, B., Shook, N. J., & Fazio, R. H. (2020). Of unbiased beans and slanted stocks: Neutral stimuli reveal the fundamental relation between political ideology and exploratory behavior. British Journal of Psychology [Epub ahead of print].https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12455
Shook, N. J., & Fazio, R. H. (2009). Political ideology, exploration of novel stimuli, and attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 995-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.003
Wilson, G. D., Ausman, J., & Mathews, T. R. (1973). Conservatism and art preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 286-8.