Quantification of the severity of outflow stenosis of hemodialysis fistulas with a pulse- and thrill-based scoring system.


Journal

BMC nephrology
ISSN: 1471-2369
Titre abrégé: BMC Nephrol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967793

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 07 2020
Historique:
received: 12 03 2020
accepted: 20 07 2020
entrez: 27 7 2020
pubmed: 28 7 2020
medline: 16 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Hyper-pulsatility of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the basic physical examination finding when there is outflow stenosis. The arm elevation test can also be utilized to detect outflow stenosis. If there is no significant outflow stenosis, the AVF should collapse, at least partially, because of the effect of gravity when the AVF-bearing arm is elevated to a level above that of the heart. However, if there is significant outflow stenosis, the portion of the AVF downstream of the stenosis will collapse, while the portion upstream of the stenosis will remain distended (Clin J Am Soc Nephro 8:1220-7, 2013). In our daily practice, when performing the arm elevation test, we not only observe the collapsibility of the access outflow but also palpate the outflow to identify a background thrill that sometimes disappears with the arm at rest, only to reappear when the arm is elevated. If there is no thrill upon arm elevation, we assume that the outflow stenosis is severe and refer to this condition as "physical examination significant outflow stenosis" (PESOS). The aim of this study is to characterize PESOS using percentage stenosis and Doppler flow parameters. We performed a case-control study using data collected prospectively between June 2019 and December 2019. A pulse- and thrill-based score system was developed to assess the severity of AVF outflow stenosis. We recorded the outflow scores and Doppler measurements performed in 84 patients with mature fistulas over a 6-month period. Angiograms were reviewed to determine the severity of outflow stenosis, which was assessed by calculation of percentage stenosis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that a cutoff value of ≥74.44% stenosis discriminated PESOS from other AVF outflow scores, with an area under the curve of 0.9011. PESOS diagnosed cases with ≥75% outflow stenosis in an AVF, with a sensitivity of 80.39%, a specificity of 78.79%, a positive predictive value of 85.42%, and a negative predictive value of 72.22%. PESOS can be used to diagnose ≥75% outflow stenosis in an AVF, with or without a significant collateral vein, and its diagnostic accuracy is high. The use of PESOS as an indicator for treatment implies that physical examination may represent a useful surveillance tool.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Hyper-pulsatility of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the basic physical examination finding when there is outflow stenosis. The arm elevation test can also be utilized to detect outflow stenosis. If there is no significant outflow stenosis, the AVF should collapse, at least partially, because of the effect of gravity when the AVF-bearing arm is elevated to a level above that of the heart. However, if there is significant outflow stenosis, the portion of the AVF downstream of the stenosis will collapse, while the portion upstream of the stenosis will remain distended (Clin J Am Soc Nephro 8:1220-7, 2013). In our daily practice, when performing the arm elevation test, we not only observe the collapsibility of the access outflow but also palpate the outflow to identify a background thrill that sometimes disappears with the arm at rest, only to reappear when the arm is elevated. If there is no thrill upon arm elevation, we assume that the outflow stenosis is severe and refer to this condition as "physical examination significant outflow stenosis" (PESOS). The aim of this study is to characterize PESOS using percentage stenosis and Doppler flow parameters.
METHODS
We performed a case-control study using data collected prospectively between June 2019 and December 2019. A pulse- and thrill-based score system was developed to assess the severity of AVF outflow stenosis. We recorded the outflow scores and Doppler measurements performed in 84 patients with mature fistulas over a 6-month period. Angiograms were reviewed to determine the severity of outflow stenosis, which was assessed by calculation of percentage stenosis.
RESULTS
Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that a cutoff value of ≥74.44% stenosis discriminated PESOS from other AVF outflow scores, with an area under the curve of 0.9011. PESOS diagnosed cases with ≥75% outflow stenosis in an AVF, with a sensitivity of 80.39%, a specificity of 78.79%, a positive predictive value of 85.42%, and a negative predictive value of 72.22%.
CONCLUSIONS
PESOS can be used to diagnose ≥75% outflow stenosis in an AVF, with or without a significant collateral vein, and its diagnostic accuracy is high. The use of PESOS as an indicator for treatment implies that physical examination may represent a useful surveillance tool.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32711458
doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01968-6
pii: 10.1186/s12882-020-01968-6
pmc: PMC7382789
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

304

Références

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Apr;6(4):819-26
pubmed: 21454718
J Vasc Access. 2018 Sep;19(5):422-429
pubmed: 29544403
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006 Aug;26(8):1729-37
pubmed: 16741150
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Sep;19(9):2325-33
pubmed: 15280529
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Sep 20;6:141
pubmed: 31620451
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Oct;24(10):3193-7
pubmed: 19395732
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Jul;8(7):1220-7
pubmed: 23824199
J Vasc Access. 2020 Jan 29;:1129729819901223
pubmed: 31992122
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Feb;33(1):67-73
pubmed: 19572170
Thromb Res. 2011 Mar;127(3):235-41
pubmed: 21172720
J Vasc Access. 2020 Jan;21(1):60-65
pubmed: 31203718
Nat Med. 2009 Jun;15(6):665-73
pubmed: 19465929

Auteurs

Matt Chiung-Yu Chen (MC)

Department of Interventional Radiology, Yuan's General Hospital, No.162, Cheng-gong 1st Rd., Lingya District, Kaohsiung City, 802, Taiwan. jjychen@gmail.com.

Mei-Jui Weng (MJ)

Department of Radiology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Bai-Chun Chang (BC)

Department of Nursing, Yuan's General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Hsiu-Ching Lai (HC)

Department of Nursing, Yuan's General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Misoso Yi-Wen Wu (MY)

Department of Nursing, Yuan's General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Chia-Yun Fu (CY)

Department of Nursing, Yuan's General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Yi-Chun Liu (YC)

Department of Nephrology, Yuan's General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Wen-Che Chi (WC)

Department of Nephrology, Yuan's General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH