Computed tomography density is not associated with pathological tumor invasion for pure ground-glass nodules.
Adenocarcinoma of Lung
/ diagnostic imaging
Adult
Aged
Female
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple Pulmonary Nodules
/ diagnostic imaging
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Pneumonectomy
Predictive Value of Tests
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule
/ diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
CT density
CT size
lung adenocarcinoma
pure ground-glass opacity
Journal
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
ISSN: 1097-685X
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2021
08 2021
Historique:
received:
11
12
2019
revised:
11
04
2020
accepted:
18
04
2020
pubmed:
28
7
2020
medline:
3
8
2021
entrez:
27
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pure ground-glass nodules are considered to be radiologically noninvasive in lung adenocarcinoma. However, some pure ground-glass nodules are found to be invasive adenocarcinoma pathologically. This study aims to identify the computed tomography parameters distinguishing invasive adenocarcinoma from adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma. From May 2011 to December 2015, patients with completely resected adenocarcinoma appearing as pure ground-glass nodules were reviewed. To evaluate the association between computed tomography features and the invasiveness of pure ground-glass nodules, logistic regression analyses were conducted. Among 432 enrolled patients, 118 (27.3%) were classified as adenocarcinoma in situ, 213 (49.3%) were classified as minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, 101 (23.4%) were classified as invasive adenocarcinoma. There was no postoperative recurrence for patients with pure ground-glass nodules. Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that computed tomography size was the only independent radiographic factor associated with adenocarcinoma in situ (odds ratio, 47.165; 95% confidence interval, 19.279-115.390; P < .001), whereas computed tomography density was not (odds ratio, 1.002; 95% confidence interval, 0.999-1.005; P = .127). Further analyses revealed that there was no distributional difference in computed tomography density among 3 groups (P = .173). Even after propensity score matching for adenocarcinoma in situ/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and invasive adenocarcinoma, no significant difference in computed tomography density was observed (P = .741). The subanalyses for pure ground-glass nodules with 1 cm or more in size also indicated similar results. In patients with pure ground-glass nodules, computed tomography size was the only radiographic parameter associated with tumor invasion. Measuring computed tomography density provided no advantage in differentiating invasive adenocarcinoma from adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32711984
pii: S0022-5223(20)31243-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.169
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Video-Audio Media
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
451-459.e3Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.