Cost-Effectiveness of Drug Treatment for Chinese Patients With Stage I Hypertension According to the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Aged
Antihypertensive Agents
/ economics
China
/ epidemiology
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Health Care Costs
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Hypertension
/ diagnosis
Male
Models, Economic
Patient Care Planning
/ standards
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Severity of Illness Index
American Heart Association
Asian continental ancestry group
cost-benefit analysis
quality-adjusted life-years
Journal
Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)
ISSN: 1524-4563
Titre abrégé: Hypertension
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7906255
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
28
7
2020
medline:
15
4
2021
entrez:
28
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Systolic/diastolic blood pressure of 130 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg has been defined as stage I hypertension by the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines. Drug treatment is recommended for stage I hypertensive patients aged ≥65 years without cardiovascular disease in the 2017 Hypertension Clinical Practice Guidelines but not in the 2018 Chinese guidelines. However, the cost-effectiveness of drug treatment among this subgroup of Chinese patients is unclear. This study developed a microsimulation model to compare costs and effectiveness of drug treatment and nondrug treatment for the subgroup of stage I hypertensive patients over a lifetime horizon from a government affordability perspective. Event rates of mortality and cardiovascular complications were estimated from 3 cohorts in the Chinese population. Costs and health utilities were obtained from the national statistics report and published literature. The model predicted that drug treatment generated quality-adjusted life-years of 13.52 and associated with expected costs of $6825 in comparison with 13.81 and $7328 produced by nondrug treatment over a lifetime horizon among stage I hypertensive patients aged ≥65 years without cardiovascular disease. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $8836/quality-adjusted life-year (the GDP per capita in 2017), drug treatment only had a 1.8% probability of being cost-effective compared with nondrug treatment after 10 000 probabilistic simulations. Sensitivity analysis of treatment costs, benefits expected from treatment, health utilities, and discount rates did not change the results. Our results suggested that drug treatment was not cost-effective compared with nondrug treatment for stage I hypertensive patients aged ≥65 years without cardiovascular disease in China.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32713271
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14533
pmc: PMC7429361
mid: NIHMS1605301
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antihypertensive Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
750-758Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA082729
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UM1 CA173640
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UM1 CA182910
Pays : United States
Références
Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):957-967
pubmed: 26724178
Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Dec 1;162(11):1123-31
pubmed: 16236996
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 10;7(8):
pubmed: 29636346
PLoS Med. 2015 Aug 04;12(8):e1001860
pubmed: 26241895
J Stroke. 2018 May;20(2):247-257
pubmed: 29886721
Lancet. 2017 Dec 9;390(10112):2559-2568
pubmed: 29102087
Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):e13-e115
pubmed: 29133356
BMJ. 2018 Jul 11;362:k2357
pubmed: 29997129
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1416-1418
pubmed: 30083722
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190406
pubmed: 30848811
Hypertension. 2019 Jan;73(1):142-147
pubmed: 30571542
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 7;8(9):e011793
pubmed: 31057004
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Aug;21(8):1212-1220
pubmed: 31267666
Stroke. 2013 May;44(5):1232-7
pubmed: 23444308
BMJ. 2003 Jun 28;326(7404):1427
pubmed: 12829555
J Hypertens. 2010 Feb;28(2):395-400
pubmed: 19864958
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;42(3):731-40
pubmed: 22531126
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Jul 20;128(14):1853-61
pubmed: 26168822
BMJ. 2009 May 19;338:b1665
pubmed: 19454737
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Mar;27(4):345-354
pubmed: 31288541
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 May;24(5):988-92
pubmed: 25813063
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 18;16:277
pubmed: 27430314
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jul;55(7):1015-22
pubmed: 17608873
JAMA. 2018 Nov 6;320(17):1783-1792
pubmed: 30398603
JAMA. 2018 Nov 6;320(17):1774-1782
pubmed: 30398601
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 24;377(8):745-755
pubmed: 28834469
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 2;60(14):1271-7
pubmed: 22981547
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):810-8
pubmed: 25733578
Prev Med. 2018 Jun;111:110-114
pubmed: 29525577
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;240:403-408
pubmed: 28501349
Eur Heart J. 2019 Mar 1;40(9):732-738
pubmed: 30462213
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104
pubmed: 30165516
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):572-581
pubmed: 29800138
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jul 6;1(3):e180606
pubmed: 30646022
Public Health. 2015 Jan;129(1):68-73
pubmed: 25542739
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 May - Jun;76:6-11
pubmed: 29407731
Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):e1-5
pubmed: 23538200
Lancet. 2017 Dec 9;390(10112):2549-2558
pubmed: 29102084
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Sep 11;72(11):1201-1210
pubmed: 30189996