Comparison of the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians and the fracture risk assessment tool - FRAX to identify densitometric defined osteoporosis: A discriminatory value analysis in a multi-ethnic female population in Southeast Asia.
Asia
Assessment threshold
FRAX
OSTA
Osteoporosis
Screening
Journal
Osteoporosis and sarcopenia
ISSN: 2405-5263
Titre abrégé: Osteoporos Sarcopenia
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101666399
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
16
02
2020
revised:
16
03
2020
accepted:
06
04
2020
entrez:
28
7
2020
pubmed:
28
7
2020
medline:
28
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The accuracy of FRAX® as a screening tool to identify osteoporosis and how it compares with tools such as Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA), in Southeast Asian women has so far been unexplored. We aimed to determine the FRAX® thresholds that accurately identify densitometric osteoporosis and to compare its performance with that of OSTA for this purpose. Singaporean postmenopausal women (n = 1056) were evaluated. FRAX® Major Osteoporotic Fracture Probability (MOFP), Hip Fracture Probability (HFP) scores, and OSTA indices were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and via the Youden index, the optimal cut-off points of balanced sensitivity and specificity for dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-defined osteoporosis were identified and the performance characteristics were compared. A FRAX® MOFP threshold of ≥3.7% had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 0.78 (0.73-0.83), 0.63 (0.59-0.66), 0.4 (0.36-0.44), and 0.9 (0.87-0.92), respectively in identifying osteoporosis. The corresponding values for a HFP threshold of ≥0.6% were 0.85 (0.80-0.89), 0.58 (0.55-0.62), 0.39 (0.35-0.43), and 0.92 (0.9-0.94) and that for an OSTA index cut-off of ≤ -1.2 were 0.76 (0.70-0.81), 0.74 (0.71-0.77), 0.48 (0.43-0.54), and 0.91 (0.88-0.93). The area under the ROC curves were 82.8% (79.9%-85.6%), 77.6% (74.2%-81%), and 79.6% (76.5%-82.8%) for OSTA, MOFP, and HFP thresholds respectively. FRAX® and OSTA perform comparably in identifying osteoporosis in our population. OSTA has only 2 parameters and may be simpler to use. However, FRAX® may also have a role in primary screening to identify the postmenopausal woman to be referred for DXA scanning and may help facilitate fracture risk reduction discussions with the patient.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32715094
doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2020.04.001
pii: S2405-5255(20)30036-4
pmc: PMC7374549
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
53-58Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Korean Society of Osteoporosis. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.
Références
Singapore Med J. 1997 Jan;38(1):25-6
pubmed: 9269350
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Oct;25(10):2359-81
pubmed: 25182228
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1994;843:1-129
pubmed: 7941614
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Mar;90(3):420-5
pubmed: 17427514
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Apr;30(4):879-886
pubmed: 30671610
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Apr;87(4):1586-92
pubmed: 11932287
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Aug;18(8):1033-46
pubmed: 17323110
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Jan;85(1):231-6
pubmed: 10634392
Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(8):699-705
pubmed: 11580084
Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Nov 26;14(1):114
pubmed: 31773442
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Nov 19;13(1):130
pubmed: 30456726
Value Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;7(5):518-28
pubmed: 15367247
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 1;47(2):389-390f
pubmed: 29415269
Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5
pubmed: 15405679
JAMA. 2018 Jun 26;319(24):2521-2531
pubmed: 29946735
J Clin Densitom. 2014 Jan-Mar;17(1):32-7
pubmed: 23489972
J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Jul;29(7):1661-6
pubmed: 24431262
J Clin Densitom. 2018 Jan - Mar;21(1):119-124
pubmed: 28958825
Lancet. 2018 Feb 24;391(10122):741-747
pubmed: 29254858
Endocr Pract. 2016 Sep 2;22(Suppl 4):1-42
pubmed: 27662240
Osteoporos Int. 2012 Jan;23(1):391-7
pubmed: 21365460
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77
pubmed: 21414208
J Bone Miner Res. 1997 Sep;12(9):1471-9
pubmed: 9286764
Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(3):192-202
pubmed: 10824234
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;29(2):233-9
pubmed: 26957380
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Oct;88 Suppl 5:S80-3
pubmed: 16871660
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Jul;29(7):1511-1513
pubmed: 29947864