The role of transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß1) in postmenopausal women with pelvic organ prolapse: An immunohistochemical study.

Aim of the study was to investigate the expression of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), a key regulator of the extracellular matrix composition, in the uterosacral ligaments (USLs) of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) compared with controls. We hypothesized that the expression pattern of TGF-β1 differs between postmenopausal women with or without POP. Under ethical approval, USL samples were obtained from postmenopausal women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy for stage two or greater pelvic organ prolapse (cases, n = 70) and from postmenopausal women without pelvic organ prolapse undergoing vaginal hysterectomy for benign indications (controls, n = 30). Immunohistochemical staining was performed from paraffin embedded tissue using anti-TGF-β1 antibodies. The expression of TGF-β1 was evaluated by the pathologist, who was blinded to all clinical data. The expression of TGF-ß1 was similar in patients with symptomatic POP (89 % positive) and in controls (90 % positive) without any signs of prolapse (p = 0.091). Age-adjusted analysis did not significantly alter these results. Regarding POP-Q stages, TGF-ß1 was significantly more frequently expressed in severe prolapse cases compared to moderate/mild cases (POP-Q stage IV versus POP-Q stage II and III; p = 0.001). No significant association could be detected between TGF-ß1 expression and age, BMI and parity in cases with POP (p > 0.05). As published previously, advanced patients' age as well as early menopausal age remained independent risk factors associated with POP in multiple logistic regression analysis (p = 0.001; p = 0.02). Although our study detected POP-Q stage related alterations in USL composition and TGF-ß1 expression, there was no significant difference in the expression of TGF-β1 in cases with or without prolapse.

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.