Exploring the identification, validation, and categorization of the cost and benefits of criminal justice in mental health: the PECUNIA project.
Criminal justice intersectoral costs and benefits
Health economics research
Mental health
Methodology
PECUNIA
Societal perspective
Journal
International journal of technology assessment in health care
ISSN: 1471-6348
Titre abrégé: Int J Technol Assess Health Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8508113
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Jul 2020
27 Jul 2020
Historique:
entrez:
28
7
2020
pubmed:
28
7
2020
medline:
28
7
2020
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Mental health disorders and their treatments produce significant costs and benefits in both healthcare and non-healthcare sectors. The latter are often referred to as intersectoral costs and benefits (ICBs). Little is known about healthcare-related ICBs in the criminal justice sector and how to include these in health economics research. The triple aim of this study is (i) to identify healthcare-related ICBs in the criminal justice sector, (ii) to validate the list of healthcare-related ICBs in the criminal justice sector on a European level by sector-specific experts, and (iii) to classify the identified ICBs. A scientific literature search in PubMed and an additional grey literature search, carried out in six European countries, were used to retrieve ICBs. In order to validate the international applicability of the ICBs, a survey was conducted with an international group of experts from the criminal justice sector. The list of criminal justice ICBs was categorized according to the PECUNIA conceptual framework. The full-text analysis of forty-five peer-reviewed journal articles and eleven grey literature sources resulted in a draft list of items. Input from the expert survey resulted in a final list of fourteen unique criminal justice ICBs, categorized according to the care atom. This study laid further foundations for the inclusion of important societal costs of mental health-related interventions within the criminal justice sector. More research is needed to facilitate the further and increased inclusion of ICBs in health economics research.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Mental health disorders and their treatments produce significant costs and benefits in both healthcare and non-healthcare sectors. The latter are often referred to as intersectoral costs and benefits (ICBs). Little is known about healthcare-related ICBs in the criminal justice sector and how to include these in health economics research.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
The triple aim of this study is (i) to identify healthcare-related ICBs in the criminal justice sector, (ii) to validate the list of healthcare-related ICBs in the criminal justice sector on a European level by sector-specific experts, and (iii) to classify the identified ICBs.
METHODS
METHODS
A scientific literature search in PubMed and an additional grey literature search, carried out in six European countries, were used to retrieve ICBs. In order to validate the international applicability of the ICBs, a survey was conducted with an international group of experts from the criminal justice sector. The list of criminal justice ICBs was categorized according to the PECUNIA conceptual framework.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The full-text analysis of forty-five peer-reviewed journal articles and eleven grey literature sources resulted in a draft list of items. Input from the expert survey resulted in a final list of fourteen unique criminal justice ICBs, categorized according to the care atom.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study laid further foundations for the inclusion of important societal costs of mental health-related interventions within the criminal justice sector. More research is needed to facilitate the further and increased inclusion of ICBs in health economics research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32715991
doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000471
pii: S0266462320000471
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM