Improving the quality of mortality review equity reporting: Development of an indigenous Māori responsiveness rubric.

Māori health cultural responsiveness equity indigenous health mortality review quality improvement

Journal

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
ISSN: 1464-3677
Titre abrégé: Int J Qual Health Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9434628

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 01 04 2020
revised: 04 07 2020
accepted: 16 07 2020
pubmed: 28 7 2020
medline: 29 7 2021
entrez: 28 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To improve consistency in New Zealand's Mortality Review Committees' (MRCs) analysis, interpretation and recommendations, specifically related to equity and Māori (the Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand) mortality. A qualitative Plan-Do-Check-Act design informed by Māori expertise to develop a rubric and guidelines. The rubric and guidelines aimed to improve MRCs' capability to analyse mortality data, its interpretation and the recommendations for preventing deaths. New Zealand's MRCs make recommendations to address preventable deaths. Variation existed between the MRCs' understanding of equity, and its application to reduce avoidable mortality for Māori, which subsequently influenced their analysis, reporting and the recommendations generated. Improving the quality and robustness of MRCs' recommendations and reporting are crucial for improving equity. Māori Caucus (comprising MRC members with Māori health and wellbeing expertise) designed the rubric and guidelines with input from the secretariat and other MRC Chairs and members. None. None. The rubric comprises four key 'pou' (metaphorical posts or domains) 'Tika' (doing things right); 'Manaakitanga' (caring compassionately); 'Mana' (status, authority); and 'Mahi tahi' (working collaboratively); and criteria for three levels of practice. Evaluation of the efficacy of the use of the rubric and its implementation showed further education and support was required. A shared understanding of equity about mortality is required. Effective implementation of a quality-based rubric into practice requires careful planning and ongoing education and support for staff and committee members at multiple levels. Follow-up support is needed to support its implementation into practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32716489
pii: 5876763
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa084
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

517-521

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Denise Wilson (D)

Taupua Waiora Māori Health Research Centre, National Institute of Public Health and Mental Health Research, Faculty of Health & Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, 55 Wellesley Street East, Auckland CBD, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.

Sue Crengle (S)

Dunedin School of Medicine, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.

Fiona Cram (F)

Katoa Ltd, PO Box 105611, Auckland City, Auckland 1143, New Zealand.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH