DNA methylation repels binding of hypoxia-inducible transcription factors to maintain tumor immunotolerance.
Cancer
Cryptic transcripts
DNA methylation
HIF
Hypoxia
Immunotherapy
Transcription factor binding
Journal
Genome biology
ISSN: 1474-760X
Titre abrégé: Genome Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100960660
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 07 2020
27 07 2020
Historique:
received:
23
01
2020
accepted:
29
06
2020
entrez:
29
7
2020
pubmed:
29
7
2020
medline:
9
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hypoxia is pervasive in cancer and other diseases. Cells sense and adapt to hypoxia by activating hypoxia-inducible transcription factors (HIFs), but it is still an outstanding question why cell types differ in their transcriptional response to hypoxia. We report that HIFs fail to bind CpG dinucleotides that are methylated in their consensus binding sequence, both in in vitro biochemical binding assays and in vivo studies of differentially methylated isogenic cell lines. Based on in silico structural modeling, we show that 5-methylcytosine indeed causes steric hindrance in the HIF binding pocket. A model wherein cell-type-specific methylation landscapes, as laid down by the differential expression and binding of other transcription factors under normoxia, control cell-type-specific hypoxia responses is observed. We also discover ectopic HIF binding sites in repeat regions which are normally methylated. Genetic and pharmacological DNA demethylation, but also cancer-associated DNA hypomethylation, expose these binding sites, inducing HIF-dependent expression of cryptic transcripts. In line with such cryptic transcripts being more prone to cause double-stranded RNA and viral mimicry, we observe low DNA methylation and high cryptic transcript expression in tumors with high immune checkpoint expression, but not in tumors with low immune checkpoint expression, where they would compromise tumor immunotolerance. In a low-immunogenic tumor model, DNA demethylation upregulates cryptic transcript expression in a HIF-dependent manner, causing immune activation and reducing tumor growth. Our data elucidate the mechanism underlying cell-type-specific responses to hypoxia and suggest DNA methylation and hypoxia to underlie tumor immunotolerance.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Hypoxia is pervasive in cancer and other diseases. Cells sense and adapt to hypoxia by activating hypoxia-inducible transcription factors (HIFs), but it is still an outstanding question why cell types differ in their transcriptional response to hypoxia.
RESULTS
We report that HIFs fail to bind CpG dinucleotides that are methylated in their consensus binding sequence, both in in vitro biochemical binding assays and in vivo studies of differentially methylated isogenic cell lines. Based on in silico structural modeling, we show that 5-methylcytosine indeed causes steric hindrance in the HIF binding pocket. A model wherein cell-type-specific methylation landscapes, as laid down by the differential expression and binding of other transcription factors under normoxia, control cell-type-specific hypoxia responses is observed. We also discover ectopic HIF binding sites in repeat regions which are normally methylated. Genetic and pharmacological DNA demethylation, but also cancer-associated DNA hypomethylation, expose these binding sites, inducing HIF-dependent expression of cryptic transcripts. In line with such cryptic transcripts being more prone to cause double-stranded RNA and viral mimicry, we observe low DNA methylation and high cryptic transcript expression in tumors with high immune checkpoint expression, but not in tumors with low immune checkpoint expression, where they would compromise tumor immunotolerance. In a low-immunogenic tumor model, DNA demethylation upregulates cryptic transcript expression in a HIF-dependent manner, causing immune activation and reducing tumor growth.
CONCLUSIONS
Our data elucidate the mechanism underlying cell-type-specific responses to hypoxia and suggest DNA methylation and hypoxia to underlie tumor immunotolerance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32718321
doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02087-z
pii: 10.1186/s13059-020-02087-z
pmc: PMC7384226
doi:
Substances chimiques
Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors
0
Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1
0
endothelial PAS domain-containing protein 1
1B37H0967P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
182Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 210664/Z/18/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 13;9(6):e99603
pubmed: 24927503
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1975;14(1):9-25
pubmed: 1093816
Cell Rep. 2015 Aug 18;12(7):1184-95
pubmed: 26257180
Science. 2001 Aug 10;293(5532):1089-93
pubmed: 11498579
Cell Rep. 2017 Jan 3;18(1):248-262
pubmed: 28052254
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Feb 27;43(4):e27
pubmed: 25477382
Nat Rev Genet. 2017 Sep;18(9):517-534
pubmed: 28555658
Cell. 2018 Jul 26;174(3):549-563.e19
pubmed: 29937226
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 15;31(2):166-9
pubmed: 25260700
Nat Rev Cancer. 2003 Oct;3(10):721-32
pubmed: 13130303
J Biol Chem. 2006 Jun 2;281(22):15215-26
pubmed: 16565084
Br J Cancer. 2010 Jan 19;102(2):428-35
pubmed: 20087356
Nature. 2015 Aug 20;524(7565):303-8
pubmed: 26245371
Cancer Res. 2009 Dec 15;69(24):9360-6
pubmed: 19951990
Nature. 2016 Sep 1;537(7618):63-68
pubmed: 27533040
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2011 Jun;Chapter 2:Unit 2.14
pubmed: 21633945
J Comput Chem. 2004 Oct;25(13):1605-12
pubmed: 15264254
Genome Res. 2014 Sep;24(9):1421-32
pubmed: 24916973
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Mar 18;47(5):e27
pubmed: 30624635
Circ Res. 2007 Jan 5;100(1):79-87
pubmed: 17110594
Trends Genet. 2017 Nov;33(11):771-772
pubmed: 28987267
Genes Cells. 2006 Jul;11(7):805-14
pubmed: 16824199
Science. 2018 Nov 30;362(6418):1060-1063
pubmed: 30498128
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 10;108(19):7739-44
pubmed: 21512126
Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 Dec 15;12(1):9-22
pubmed: 22169972
Cell. 2015 Jan 15;160(1-2):48-61
pubmed: 25594174
Nature. 1997 Mar 27;386(6623):403-7
pubmed: 9121557
Elife. 2014 Aug 01;3:e02725
pubmed: 25085081
Cancer Cell. 2017 Nov 13;32(5):669-683.e5
pubmed: 29136509
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Apr;9(4):285-96
pubmed: 18285802
Science. 1975 Jan 24;187(4173):226-32
pubmed: 1111098
Mol Cell. 2017 Jun 15;66(6):772-779
pubmed: 28622522
Cancer Res. 2015 Sep 15;75(18):3800-11
pubmed: 26208901
BMC Genomics. 2014 Jul 11;15:583
pubmed: 25012247
Cell Stem Cell. 2013 Sep 5;13(3):360-9
pubmed: 23850244
Nat Rev Immunol. 2015 Jul;15(7):405-14
pubmed: 26027717
Nature. 2000 May 25;405(6785):482-5
pubmed: 10839546
Genome Res. 2017 Oct;27(10):1623-1633
pubmed: 28855262
Toxicol Sci. 2014 Mar;138(1):89-103
pubmed: 24299737
Mol Cell Biol. 2015 Dec 28;36(5):809-19
pubmed: 26711262
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Mar;33(3):290-5
pubmed: 25690850
Trends Genet. 2018 Oct;34(10):806-820
pubmed: 30057183
Curr Biol. 2010 Aug 24;20(16):1452-7
pubmed: 20637626
Nature. 2012 Sep 6;489(7414):57-74
pubmed: 22955616
Nat Genet. 2017 Jul;49(7):1052-1060
pubmed: 28604729
Essays Biochem. 2019 Dec 20;63(6):727-741
pubmed: 31755929
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1009-1021
pubmed: 28694034
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Aug 12;111(32):11774-9
pubmed: 25071169
Cell. 2015 Aug 27;162(5):961-73
pubmed: 26317465
Cell Stem Cell. 2014 Apr 3;14(4):512-22
pubmed: 24529596
Cancer Lett. 2007 Aug 8;253(1):74-88
pubmed: 17320280
Cell Rep. 2014 Jun 12;7(5):1343-1352
pubmed: 24835990
Nat Med. 2013 Jan;19(1):50-6
pubmed: 23223005
Cancer Cell. 2019 Dec 9;36(6):597-612.e8
pubmed: 31708437
Blood. 2011 Jun 9;117(23):e207-17
pubmed: 21447827
Nat Med. 2018 Aug;24(8):1277-1289
pubmed: 29988129
Genome Biol. 2009;10(10):R113
pubmed: 19828020
PLoS Med. 2006 Mar;3(3):e47
pubmed: 16417408
Oncogene. 2014 Apr 3;33(14):1743-54
pubmed: 23604130
Science. 2016 May 6;352(6286):658-60
pubmed: 27151852
Clin Epigenetics. 2020 Feb 14;12(1):27
pubmed: 32059745
BMC Genomics. 2018 Jun 18;19(1):468
pubmed: 29914366
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Nov 1;34(11):2856-2869
pubmed: 28961735
PLoS One. 2010 Jan 26;5(1):e8888
pubmed: 20126651
Cell. 2015 Aug 27;162(5):974-86
pubmed: 26317466
Eur J Biochem. 1998 May 1;253(3):771-7
pubmed: 9654078