A survival analysis of primary second molars in children treated under general anesthesia.


Journal

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)
ISSN: 1943-4723
Titre abrégé: J Am Dent Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7503060

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2020
Historique:
received: 23 12 2019
revised: 10 03 2020
accepted: 03 04 2020
entrez: 29 7 2020
pubmed: 29 7 2020
medline: 14 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The authors examined time to need new treatment of primary second molars in very young children treated under general anesthesia (GA). During this retrospective chart review, the authors examined patients aged 2 through 4 years with severe early childhood caries (ECC) who received dental treatment under GA. Primary second molars were tracked in periodic recall visits after GA for 6 through 89 months. Using a random-effects Cox proportional hazards model, the authors compared hazards of teeth requiring new treatment based on treatments received at GA. Of 3,166 primary second molars included in the study, 367 (12%) were not erupted, 77 (2%) received topical fluoride only, 873 (28%) received a pit and fissure sealant, 242 (8%) received a composite restoration, and 1,607 (50%) received a stainless steel crown (SSC) at GA. SSCs had a survival probability of 98% by 84 months after GA, significantly higher than all other groups (P < .0001). The second molars that were not erupted at GA had the highest hazard, especially within the first 24 months after GA. Teeth that received sealant had longer time to need new treatment than nonsealed teeth; however, at 84 months after GA, only 33% of the sealed teeth did not require additional treatment. Preventive or restorative treatments other than SSCs resulted in need for new treatment in a substantial number of teeth. SSCs had the highest success in this population with severe ECC treated under GA and should be chosen over other restorative options to reduce risk of undergoing repeat dental treatment. Aggressive treatment with SCC should be considered for young children with severe ECC especially those who are treated under GA at a young age.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The authors examined time to need new treatment of primary second molars in very young children treated under general anesthesia (GA).
METHODS
During this retrospective chart review, the authors examined patients aged 2 through 4 years with severe early childhood caries (ECC) who received dental treatment under GA. Primary second molars were tracked in periodic recall visits after GA for 6 through 89 months. Using a random-effects Cox proportional hazards model, the authors compared hazards of teeth requiring new treatment based on treatments received at GA.
RESULTS
Of 3,166 primary second molars included in the study, 367 (12%) were not erupted, 77 (2%) received topical fluoride only, 873 (28%) received a pit and fissure sealant, 242 (8%) received a composite restoration, and 1,607 (50%) received a stainless steel crown (SSC) at GA. SSCs had a survival probability of 98% by 84 months after GA, significantly higher than all other groups (P < .0001). The second molars that were not erupted at GA had the highest hazard, especially within the first 24 months after GA. Teeth that received sealant had longer time to need new treatment than nonsealed teeth; however, at 84 months after GA, only 33% of the sealed teeth did not require additional treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
Preventive or restorative treatments other than SSCs resulted in need for new treatment in a substantial number of teeth. SSCs had the highest success in this population with severe ECC treated under GA and should be chosen over other restorative options to reduce risk of undergoing repeat dental treatment.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
Aggressive treatment with SCC should be considered for young children with severe ECC especially those who are treated under GA at a young age.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32718486
pii: S0002-8177(20)30288-9
doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.04.015
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Pit and Fissure Sealants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

568-575

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 American Dental Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH