Development and validation of metric-based-training to proficiency simulation curriculum for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using a novel assessment checklist.

Assessment tool colonoscopy curriculum endoscopy skills gastroenterology training gastroscopy metrics simulation training to proficiency

Journal

Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
ISSN: 1998-4049
Titre abrégé: Saudi J Gastroenterol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9516979

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Jul 2020
Historique:
entrez: 29 7 2020
pubmed: 29 7 2020
medline: 29 7 2020
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

: This study aimed to design a structured simulation training curriculum for upper endoscopy and validate a new assessment checklist. A proficiency-based progression stepwise curriculum was developed consisting of didactic, technical and non-technical components using a virtual reality simulator (VRS). It focused on: scope navigation, anatomical landmarks identification, mucosal inspection, retro-flexion, pathology identification, and targeting biopsy. A total of 5 experienced and 10 novice endoscopists were recruited. All participants performed each of the selected modules twice, and mean and median performance were compared between the two groups. Novices pre-set level of proficiency was set as 2 standard deviations below the mean of experts. Performance was assessed using multiple-choice questions for knowledge, while validated simulator parameters incorporated into a novel checklist; Simulation Endoscopic Skill Assessment Score (SESAS) were used for technical skills. : The following VRS outcome measures have shown expert vs novice baseline discriminative ability: total procedure time, number of attempts for esophageal intubation and time in red-out. All novice trainees achieved the preset level of proficiency by the end of training. There were no statistically significant differences between experts' and trainees' rate of complications, landmarks identification and patient discomfort. SESAS checklist showed high degree of agreement with the VRS metrices (kappa = 0.83) and the previously validated direct observation of procedural skills tool (kappa = 0.90). : The Fundamentals of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy simulation training curriculum and its SESAS global assessment tool have been primarily validated and can serve as a valuable addition to the gastroenterology fellowship programs. Follow up study of trainee performance in workplaces is recommended for consequences validation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/AIMS OBJECTIVE
: This study aimed to design a structured simulation training curriculum for upper endoscopy and validate a new assessment checklist.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
A proficiency-based progression stepwise curriculum was developed consisting of didactic, technical and non-technical components using a virtual reality simulator (VRS). It focused on: scope navigation, anatomical landmarks identification, mucosal inspection, retro-flexion, pathology identification, and targeting biopsy. A total of 5 experienced and 10 novice endoscopists were recruited. All participants performed each of the selected modules twice, and mean and median performance were compared between the two groups. Novices pre-set level of proficiency was set as 2 standard deviations below the mean of experts. Performance was assessed using multiple-choice questions for knowledge, while validated simulator parameters incorporated into a novel checklist; Simulation Endoscopic Skill Assessment Score (SESAS) were used for technical skills.
RESULTS RESULTS
: The following VRS outcome measures have shown expert vs novice baseline discriminative ability: total procedure time, number of attempts for esophageal intubation and time in red-out. All novice trainees achieved the preset level of proficiency by the end of training. There were no statistically significant differences between experts' and trainees' rate of complications, landmarks identification and patient discomfort. SESAS checklist showed high degree of agreement with the VRS metrices (kappa = 0.83) and the previously validated direct observation of procedural skills tool (kappa = 0.90).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
: The Fundamentals of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy simulation training curriculum and its SESAS global assessment tool have been primarily validated and can serve as a valuable addition to the gastroenterology fellowship programs. Follow up study of trainee performance in workplaces is recommended for consequences validation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32719238
pii: 290341
doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_113_20
pmc: PMC7580730
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None

Références

Med Teach. 2005 May;27(3):193-9
pubmed: 16011941
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD008237
pubmed: 22696375
Gut. 2016 Apr;65(4):607-15
pubmed: 25636697
JSLS. 2020 Apr-Jun;24(2):
pubmed: 32273671
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jan;79(1):1-7
pubmed: 24239255
Acad Med. 2011 Jun;86(6):706-11
pubmed: 21512370
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Oct;12(10):1611-23.e4
pubmed: 24509241
Endoscopy. 2010 Dec;42(12):1049-56
pubmed: 20972956
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):279-87
pubmed: 25899812
Can J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jul-Aug;11(5):429-32
pubmed: 9286478
J Surg Educ. 2016 Jan-Feb;73(1):12-23
pubmed: 26699281
Surg Endosc. 2004 Oct;18(10):1514-8
pubmed: 15791380
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Dec 01;15:216
pubmed: 26628262
Ann Surg. 2007 Nov;246(5):771-9
pubmed: 17968168

Auteurs

Nahla Azzam (N)

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Nehal Khamis (N)

Saudi Commission for Health Specialties; King Saud University Clinical Skills and Simulation Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; Departments of Pathology and Medical Education, College of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

Majid Almadi (M)

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Faisal Batwa (F)

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, King Saud bin AbdulAziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Fahad Alsohaibani (F)

Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Abdulrahman Aljebreen (A)

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Ahmad Alharbi (A)

Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Yasser Alaska (Y)

King Saud University Clinical Skills and Simulation Center; Department of Emergency Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Turki Alameel (T)

Department of Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Peter Irving (P)

London Digestive Health, London Hospital Medical College, London, United Kingdom.

Richard M Satava (RM)

Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Classifications MeSH