p63 uses a switch-like mechanism to set the threshold for induction of apoptosis.


Journal

Nature chemical biology
ISSN: 1552-4469
Titre abrégé: Nat Chem Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231976

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2020
Historique:
received: 26 06 2019
accepted: 25 06 2020
pubmed: 29 7 2020
medline: 15 12 2020
entrez: 29 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The p53 homolog TAp63α is the transcriptional key regulator of genome integrity in oocytes. After DNA damage, TAp63α is activated by multistep phosphorylation involving multiple phosphorylation events by the kinase CK1, which triggers the transition from a dimeric and inactive conformation to an open and active tetramer that initiates apoptosis. By measuring activation kinetics in ovaries and single-site phosphorylation kinetics in vitro with peptides and full-length protein, we show that TAp63α phosphorylation follows a biphasic behavior. Although the first two CK1 phosphorylation events are fast, the third one, which constitutes the decisive step to form the active conformation, is slow. Structure determination of CK1 in complex with differently phosphorylated peptides reveals the structural mechanism for the difference in the kinetic behavior based on an unusual CK1/TAp63α substrate interaction in which the product of one phosphorylation step acts as an inhibitor for the following one.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32719556
doi: 10.1038/s41589-020-0600-3
pii: 10.1038/s41589-020-0600-3
doi:

Substances chimiques

TP63 protein, human 0
Transcription Factors 0
Tumor Suppressor Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1078-1086

Subventions

Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom

Références

Johnston, R. J. & Wallace, W. H. Normal ovarian function and assessment of ovarian reserve in the survivor of childhood cancer. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 53, 296–302 (2009).
pubmed: 19514070 doi: 10.1002/pbc.22012
Maltaris, T., Beckmann, M. W. & Dittrich, R. Review. Fertility preservation for young female cancer patients. Vivo 23, 123–130 (2009).
Suh, E. K. et al. p63 protects the female germ line during meiotic arrest. Nature 444, 624–628 (2006).
pubmed: 17122775 doi: 10.1038/nature05337
Wallace, W. H., Thomson, A. B. & Kelsey, T. W. The radiosensitivity of the human oocyte. Hum. Reprod. 18, 117–121 (2003).
pubmed: 12525451 doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg016
Quast, U. Whole body radiotherapy: a TBI-guideline. J. Med. Phys. 31, 5–12 (2006).
pubmed: 21206634 pmcid: 3003894 doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.25664
Woodard, T. L. & Bolcun-Filas, E. Prolonging reproductive life after cancer: the need for fertoprotective therapies. Trends Cancer 2, 222–233 (2016).
pubmed: 28741510 doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2016.03.006
Livera, G. et al. p63 null mutation protects mouse oocytes from radio-induced apoptosis. Reproduction 135, 3–12 (2008).
pubmed: 18159078 doi: 10.1530/REP-07-0054
Deutsch, G. B. et al. DNA damage in oocytes induces a switch of the quality control factor TAp63α from dimer to tetramer. Cell 144, 566–576 (2011).
pubmed: 21335238 pmcid: 3087504 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.013
Kerr, J. B. et al. DNA damage-induced primordial follicle oocyte apoptosis and loss of fertility require TAp63-mediated induction of Puma and Noxa. Mol. Cell 48, 343–352 (2012).
pubmed: 23000175 pmcid: 3496022 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.017
Kim, S. Y. et al. Transient inhibition of p53 homologs protects ovarian function from two distinct apoptotic pathways triggered by anticancer therapies. Cell Death Differ. 26, 502–515 (2019).
pubmed: 29988075 doi: 10.1038/s41418-018-0151-2
Bolcun-Filas, E., Rinaldi, V. D., White, M. E. & Schimenti, J. C. Reversal of female infertility by Chk2 ablation reveals the oocyte DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Science 343, 533–536 (2014).
pubmed: 24482479 pmcid: 4048839 doi: 10.1126/science.1247671
Tuppi, M. et al. Oocyte DNA damage quality control requires consecutive interplay of CHK2 and CK1 to activate p63. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 261–269 (2018).
pubmed: 29483652 doi: 10.1038/s41594-018-0035-7
Cesaro, L. & Pinna, L. A. The generation of phosphoserine stretches in phosphoproteins: mechanism and significance. Mol. Biosyst. 11, 2666–2679 (2015).
pubmed: 26211804 doi: 10.1039/C5MB00337G
Knippschild, U. et al. The CK1 family: contribution to cellular stress response and its role in carcinogenesis. Front Oncol. 4, 96 (2014).
pubmed: 24904820 pmcid: 4032983 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00096
Schittek, B. & Sinnberg, T. Biological functions of casein kinase 1 isoforms and putative roles in tumorigenesis. Mol. Cancer 13, 231 (2014).
pubmed: 25306547 pmcid: 4201705 doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-231
Coutandin, D. et al. Quality control in oocytes by p63 is based on a spring-loaded activation mechanism on the molecular and cellular level. eLife 5, e13909 (2016).
pubmed: 27021569 pmcid: 4876613 doi: 10.7554/eLife.13909
Prehoda, K. E., Scott, J. A., Mullins, R. D. & Lim, W. A. Integration of multiple signals through cooperative regulation of the N-WASP-Arp2/3 complex. Science 290, 801–806 (2000).
pubmed: 11052943 doi: 10.1126/science.290.5492.801
Chen, L., Glover, J. N., Hogan, P. G., Rao, A. & Harrison, S. C. Structure of the DNA-binding domains from NFAT, Fos and Jun bound specifically to DNA. Nature 392, 42–48 (1998).
pubmed: 9510247 doi: 10.1038/32100
Rinaldi, V. D., Hsieh, K., Munroe, R., Bolcun-Filas, E. M. & Schimenti, J. C. Pharmacological inhibition of the DNA damage checkpoint prevents radiation-induced oocyte death. Genetics 206, 1823–1828 (2017).
pubmed: 28576861 pmcid: 5560790 doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.203455
Carmell, M. A. et al. A widely employed germ cell marker is an ancient disordered protein with reproductive functions in diverse eukaryotes. eLife 5, e19993 (2016).
pubmed: 27718356 pmcid: 5098910 doi: 10.7554/eLife.19993
Keller, P. J., Schmidt, A. D., Wittbrodt, J. & Stelzer, E. H. Digital scanned laser light-sheet fluorescence microscopy (DSLM) of zebrafish and Drosophila embryonic development. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2011, 1235–1243 (2011).
pubmed: 21969622 doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot065839
Susaki, E. A. et al. Whole-brain imaging with single-cell resolution using chemical cocktails and computational analysis. Cell 157, 726–739 (2014).
pubmed: 24746791 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.042
Hotte, K. et al. Ultra-thin fluorocarbon foils optimise multiscale imaging of three-dimensional native and optically cleared specimens. Sci. Rep. 9, 17292 (2019).
pubmed: 31754183 pmcid: 6872575 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53380-2
Ferrell, J. E. Jr & Ha, S. H. Ultrasensitivity part III: cascades, bistable switches and oscillators. Trends Biochem. Sci. 39, 612–618 (2014).
pubmed: 25456048 pmcid: 4254632 doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.10.002
Ferrell, J. E. Jr & Ha, S. H. Ultrasensitivity part II: multisite phosphorylation, stoichiometric inhibitors and positive feedback. Trends Biochem. Sci. 39, 556–569 (2014).
pubmed: 25440716 pmcid: 4435807 doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.09.003
Ferrell, J. E. Jr & Ha, S. H. Ultrasensitivity part I: Michaelian responses and zero-order ultrasensitivity. Trends Biochem. Sci. 39, 496–503 (2014).
pubmed: 25240485 pmcid: 4214216 doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.08.003
Ferrell, J. E. Jr & Bhatt, R. R. Mechanistic studies of the dual phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 19008–19016 (1997).
pubmed: 9228083 doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.30.19008
Serber, Z. et al. A C-terminal inhibitory domain controls the activity of p63 by an intramolecular mechanism. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 8601–8611 (2002).
pubmed: 12446779 pmcid: 139862 doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.24.8601-8611.2002
Straub, W. E. et al. The C-terminus of p63 contains multiple regulatory elements with different functions. Cell Death Dis. 1, e5 (2010).
pubmed: 21364624 pmcid: 3032508 doi: 10.1038/cddis.2009.1
Selenko, P. et al. In situ observation of protein phosphorylation by high-resolution NMR spectroscopy. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 321–329 (2008).
pubmed: 18297086 doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1395
Cordier, F. et al. Ordered phosphorylation events in two independent cascades of the PTEN C-tail revealed by NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 20533–20543 (2012).
pubmed: 23171049 doi: 10.1021/ja310214g
Narasimamurthy, R. et al. CK1ẟε protein kinase primes the PER2 circadian phosphoswitch. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5986–5991 (2018).
pubmed: 29784789 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721076115 pmcid: 6003379
Mylona, A. et al. Opposing effects of Elk-1 multisite phosphorylation shape its response to ERK activation. Science 354, 233–237 (2016).
pubmed: 27738173 pmcid: 5321235 doi: 10.1126/science.aad1872
Leroy, A. et al. Spectroscopic studies of GSK3β phosphorylation of the neuronal Tau protein and its interaction with the N-terminal domain of apolipoprotein E. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 33435–33444 (2010).
pubmed: 20679343 pmcid: 2963357 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.149419
Philpott, J. M. Casein kinase 1 dynamics underlie substrate selectivity and the PER2 circadian phosphoswitch. eLife 9, e52343 (2020).
pubmed: 32043967 pmcid: 7012598 doi: 10.7554/eLife.52343
Theillet, F. X. et al. Sensitivity-enhanced
doi: 10.1002/anie.202002288
Favier, A. & Brutscher, B. Recovering lost magnetization: polarization enhancement in biomolecular NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 49, 9–15 (2011).
pubmed: 21190063 doi: 10.1007/s10858-010-9461-5
Zhao, B., Li, L., Tumaneng, K., Wang, C. Y. & Guan, K. L. A coordinated phosphorylation by Lats and CK1 regulates YAP stability through SCF(β-TRCP). Genes Dev. 24, 72–85 (2010).
pubmed: 20048001 pmcid: 2802193 doi: 10.1101/gad.1843810
Shinohara, Y. et al. Temperature-sensitive substrate and product binding underlie temperature-compensated phosphorylation in the clock. Mol. Cell 67, 783–798 (2017).
pubmed: 28886336 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.08.009
Rossi, V. et al. LH prevents cisplatin-induced apoptosis in oocytes and preserves female fertility in mouse. Cell Death Differ. 24, 72–82 (2017).
pubmed: 27689876 doi: 10.1038/cdd.2016.97
Pampaloni, F., Stelzer, E. H. K. & Mattheyer, C. Capillary cell, arrangement and method for accommodating, positioning and examining a microscopic specimen. US patent 20150211981A1 (2015).
Lohr, F., Gebel, J., Henrich, E., Hein, C. & Dotsch, V. Towards complete polypeptide backbone NH assignment via combinatorial labeling. J. Magn. Reson. 302, 50–63 (2019).
pubmed: 30959416 doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2019.03.010
Gil, S. et al. NMR spectroscopic studies of intrinsically disordered proteins at near-physiological conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 11808–11812 (2013).
doi: 10.1002/anie.201304272
Bermel, W. et al. Complete assignment of heteronuclear protein resonances by protonless NMR spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 3089–3092 (2005).
doi: 10.1002/anie.200461794
McIntosh, L. P. et al. Detection and assignment of phosphoserine and phosphothreonine residues by
pubmed: 19002654 doi: 10.1007/s10858-008-9287-6
Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125–132 (2010).
pubmed: 20124692 pmcid: 2815665 doi: 10.1107/S0907444909047337
Evans, P. R. & Murshudov, G. N. How good are my data and what is the resolution? Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 69, 1204–1214 (2013).
pubmed: 23793146 pmcid: 3689523 doi: 10.1107/S0907444913000061
McCoy, A. J. Acknowledging errors: advanced molecular replacement with phaser. Methods Mol. Biol. 1607, 421–453 (2017).
pubmed: 28573584 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7000-1_18
Long, A. M., Zhao, H. & Huang, X. Structural basis for the potent and selective inhibition of casein kinase 1 epsilon. J. Med. Chem. 55, 10307–10311 (2012).
pubmed: 23106386 doi: 10.1021/jm301336n
Emsley, P. Tools for ligand validation in COOT. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 73, 203–210 (2017).
pubmed: 28291755 pmcid: 5349432 doi: 10.1107/S2059798317003382
Skubak, P., Murshudov, G. N. & Pannu, N. S. Direct incorporation of experimental phase information in model refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2196–2201 (2004).
pubmed: 15572772 doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019079
Sali, A. & Blundell, T. L. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779–815 (1993).
pubmed: 8254673 doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 27–28 (1996).
doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
Bekker, H. et al. GROMACS—a parallel computer for molecular-dynamics simulations. Phys. Comput. 92, 252–256 (1993).
Best, R. B. & Hummer, G. Optimized molecular dynamics force fields applied to the helix-coil transition of polypeptides. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 9004–9015 (2009).
pubmed: 19514729 pmcid: 3115786 doi: 10.1021/jp901540t
Lindorff-Larsen, K. et al. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins 78, 1950–1958 (2010).
pubmed: 20408171 pmcid: 2970904 doi: 10.1002/prot.22711
Mamatkulov, S. & Schwierz, N. Force fields for monovalent and divalent metal cations in TIP3P water based on thermodynamic and kinetic properties. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 074504 (2018).
pubmed: 29471634 doi: 10.1063/1.5017694
Meagher, K. L., Redman, L. T. & Carlson, H. A. Development of polyphosphate parameters for use with the AMBER force field. J. Comput. Chem. 24, 1016–1025 (2003).
pubmed: 12759902 doi: 10.1002/jcc.10262
Homeyer, N., Horn, A. H. C., Lanig, H. & Sticht, H. AMBER force-field parameters for phosphorylated amino acids in different protonation states: phosphoserine, phosphothreonine, phosphotyrosine and phosphohistidine. J. Mol. Model. 12, 281–289 (2006).
pubmed: 16240095 doi: 10.1007/s00894-005-0028-4
Greis, K. D. et al. MALDI-TOF MS as a label-free approach to rapid inhibitor screening. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 17, 815–822 (2006).
pubmed: 16616859 doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2006.02.019
Heap, R. E. et al. Identifying inhibitors of inflammation: a novel high-throughput MALDI-TOF screening assay for salt-inducible kinases (SIKs). SLAS Discov. 22, 1193–1202 (2017).
pubmed: 28692323 pmcid: 5700774

Auteurs

Jakob Gebel (J)

Institute of Biophysical Chemistry and Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance and Cluster of Excellence Macromolecular Complexes (CEF), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Marcel Tuppi (M)

Institute of Biophysical Chemistry and Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance and Cluster of Excellence Macromolecular Complexes (CEF), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. marcel.tuppi@crick.ac.uk.
The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. marcel.tuppi@crick.ac.uk.

Apirat Chaikuad (A)

Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Katharina Hötte (K)

Physikalische Biologie, Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (BMLS), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Martin Schröder (M)

Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Laura Schulz (L)

Department of Theoretical Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Frank Löhr (F)

Institute of Biophysical Chemistry and Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance and Cluster of Excellence Macromolecular Complexes (CEF), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Niklas Gutfreund (N)

Institute of Biophysical Chemistry and Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance and Cluster of Excellence Macromolecular Complexes (CEF), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Franziska Finke (F)

Institute of Biophysical Chemistry and Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance and Cluster of Excellence Macromolecular Complexes (CEF), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Erik Henrich (E)

Institute of Biophysical Chemistry and Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance and Cluster of Excellence Macromolecular Complexes (CEF), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Julija Mezhyrova (J)

Institute of Biophysical Chemistry and Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance and Cluster of Excellence Macromolecular Complexes (CEF), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Ralf Lehnert (R)

Mathezentrum, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Francesco Pampaloni (F)

Physikalische Biologie, Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (BMLS), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Gerhard Hummer (G)

Department of Theoretical Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Institute of Biophysics, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Ernst H K Stelzer (EHK)

Physikalische Biologie, Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (BMLS), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Stefan Knapp (S)

Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Volker Dötsch (V)

Institute of Biophysical Chemistry and Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance and Cluster of Excellence Macromolecular Complexes (CEF), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. vdoetsch@em.uni-frankfurt.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH