Influence of Network Topology on the Viscoelastic Properties of Dynamically Crosslinked Hydrogels.
coiled coil
hydrogel
multivalency
network topology
polyethylene glycol
polyisocyanopeptide
relaxation time
rheology
Journal
Frontiers in chemistry
ISSN: 2296-2646
Titre abrégé: Front Chem
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101627988
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
30
01
2020
accepted:
26
05
2020
entrez:
29
7
2020
pubmed:
29
7
2020
medline:
29
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Biological materials combine stress relaxation and self-healing with non-linear stress-strain responses. These characteristic features are a direct result of hierarchical self-assembly, which often results in fiber-like architectures. Even though structural knowledge is rapidly increasing, it has remained a challenge to establish relationships between microscopic and macroscopic structure and function. Here, we focus on understanding how network topology determines the viscoelastic properties, i.e., stress relaxation, of biomimetic hydrogels. We have dynamically crosslinked two different synthetic polymers with one and the same crosslink. The first polymer, a polyisocyanopeptide (PIC), self-assembles into semi-flexible, fiber-like bundles, and thus displays stress-stiffening, similar to many biopolymer networks. The second polymer, 4-arm poly(ethylene glycol) (starPEG), serves as a reference network with well-characterized structural and viscoelastic properties. Using one and the same coiled coil crosslink allows us to decouple the effects of crosslink kinetics and network topology on the stress relaxation behavior of the resulting hydrogel networks. We show that the fiber-containing PIC network displays a relaxation time approximately two orders of magnitude slower than the starPEG network. This reveals that crosslink kinetics is not the only determinant for stress relaxation. Instead, we propose that the different network topologies determine the ability of elastically active network chains to relax stress. In the starPEG network, each elastically active chain contains exactly one crosslink. In the absence of entanglements, crosslink dissociation thus relaxes the entire chain. In contrast, each polymer is crosslinked to the fiber bundle in multiple positions in the PIC hydrogel. The dissociation of a single crosslink is thus not sufficient for chain relaxation. This suggests that tuning the number of crosslinks per elastically active chain in combination with crosslink kinetics is a powerful design principle for tuning stress relaxation in polymeric materials. The presence of a higher number of crosslinks per elastically active chain thus yields materials with a slow macroscopic relaxation time but fast dynamics at the microscopic level. Using this principle for the design of synthetic cell culture matrices will yield materials with excellent long-term stability combined with the ability to locally reorganize, thus facilitating cell motility, spreading, and growth.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32719773
doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00536
pmc: PMC7349520
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
536Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Grad, Tunn, Voerman, de Léon, Hammink and Blank.
Références
Biophys J. 2009 Jul 8;97(1):83-9
pubmed: 19580746
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011 Sep 19;50(39):9026-57
pubmed: 21898722
Cell. 2015 Mar 12;160(6):1159-68
pubmed: 25748652
Nat Commun. 2015 Feb 19;6:6364
pubmed: 25695512
Nat Mater. 2015 Dec;14(12):1210-6
pubmed: 26322715
Nat Mater. 2011 Mar;10(3):236-42
pubmed: 21217691
Eur Biophys J. 2011 Jan;40(1):93-101
pubmed: 20734192
Biomimetics (Basel). 2019 Mar 18;4(1):
pubmed: 31105210
Chem Sci. 2018 Apr 23;9(20):4610-4621
pubmed: 29899954
J Am Chem Soc. 2013 Apr 3;135(13):5161-6
pubmed: 23477407
Phys Rev Lett. 2018 Aug 3;121(5):058003
pubmed: 30118309
Soft Matter. 2016 Mar 7;12(9):2537-41
pubmed: 26760315
Adv Mater. 2018 Mar;30(13):e1706092
pubmed: 29446165
Nature. 2013 Jan 31;493(7434):651-5
pubmed: 23354048
Science. 2013 May 3;340(6132):595-9
pubmed: 23579496
Science. 1998 Jul 17;281(5375):389-92
pubmed: 9665877
Nat Commun. 2017 May 25;8:15478
pubmed: 28541273
Nat Mater. 2006 Sep;5(9):748-53
pubmed: 16921360
Nature. 1999 Feb 4;397(6718):417-20
pubmed: 9989405
Soft Matter. 2018 Feb 21;14(8):1442-1448
pubmed: 29392267
Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7716):65-69
pubmed: 30022167
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2018 Jul 26;5(9):1800638
pubmed: 30250802
Trends Biochem Sci. 1996 Oct;21(10):375-82
pubmed: 8918191
Biomacromolecules. 2017 Oct 9;18(10):3310-3317
pubmed: 28930451
Adv Mater. 2014 Feb 12;26(6):865-72
pubmed: 24127293
Adv Protein Chem. 2005;70:79-112
pubmed: 15837514
Nature. 2005 May 12;435(7039):191-4
pubmed: 15889088
Nat Mater. 2016 Mar;15(3):326-34
pubmed: 26618884
Nat Mater. 2016 Mar;15(3):318-25
pubmed: 26618883
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014 Sep 15;53(38):10038-43
pubmed: 25056596
Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Dec 15;97(24):248101
pubmed: 17280328
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1094-1101
pubmed: 29035374
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Nov;1853(11 Pt B):3025-37
pubmed: 26151340
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2005 Apr 29;44(18):2746-2748
pubmed: 15806606
Biomacromolecules. 2016 Aug 8;17(8):2642-9
pubmed: 27409975
Biomacromolecules. 2016 Jun 13;17(6):2260-7
pubmed: 27219681
ACS Nano. 2016 Jan 26;10(1):1317-24
pubmed: 26645284
Soft Matter. 2006 Dec 13;3(1):99-107
pubmed: 32680200
Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 4;9(1):2172
pubmed: 29867185
Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Feb 5;104(5):058101
pubmed: 20366795
Nanoscale. 2018 Dec 13;10(48):22725-22729
pubmed: 30500033
Nat Commun. 2015 Jul 06;6:7418
pubmed: 26145480
Soft Matter. 2020 May 7;16(17):4210-4219
pubmed: 32292943
Biomacromolecules. 2006 Apr;7(4):1187-95
pubmed: 16602737
Science. 2001 Jul 27;293(5530):676-80
pubmed: 11474106
Nat Commun. 2014 Dec 16;5:5808
pubmed: 25510333