Evaluation of Using the Sphygmomanometer Test to Assess Pain Sensitivity in Chronic Pain Patients vs Normal Controls.


Journal

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
ISSN: 1526-4637
Titre abrégé: Pain Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100894201

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 11 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 29 7 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
entrez: 29 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Objectively measuring pain sensitivity has not been easy in primary care clinics. A sphygmomanometer test (a sensory test that measures an individual's nociceptive response to pressure using a standard blood pressure cuff) has recently been established to test pain sensitivity. Here, we examined the feasibility of using the sphygmomanometer test with chronic pain patients. Population, observational study. A community hospital multidisciplinary Pain Center and a private nonprofit university. Healthy controls and chronic pain patients were recruited. All subjects underwent four pain sensitivity tests: a pressure algometer test, a cold pressure test, a heat sensitivity test, and a sphygmomanometer test. Participants then completed four established surveys for evaluating depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7), fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale), and pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale). Although pain patients had significantly higher levels of depression, anxiety, fatigue, and pain catastrophizing, as well as reported pain scores, no significant differences in pain sensitivity were detected via any of the pain sensitivity tests. In the control but not the patient group, results from all pain sensitivity tests including the sphygmomanometer test were significantly correlated with each other. Unlike other pain sensitivity tests, the sphygmomanometer test did not correlate with measures of depression, anxiety, fatigue, or pain catastrophizing characteristics. Our results indicate the unique characteristics of the sphygmomanometer test as a pain sensitivity test, particularly when utilized for individuals with chronic pain. Multiple pain sensitivity tests that assess various sensory modalities are needed to evaluate pain sensitivities in chronic pain patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32719856
pii: 5876973
doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa191
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2903-2912

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Seth Butler (S)

College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine.

Kyle Draleau (K)

College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine.

Ross Heinrich (R)

College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine.

Liem Nguyen (L)

College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine.

David Shbeeb (D)

College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine.

Daniel Sigalovsky (D)

College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine.

WoonYuen Koh (W)

Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine.

Stephen Z Hull (SZ)

Northern Light Mercy Hospital Pain Center, Portland, Maine.

Ling Cao (L)

College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH