Which is the best radiological imaging method for predicting actual prostate weight?
actual prostate weight
estimated prostate volume
multiparametric prostate MR
prostate
prostatectomy
Journal
Andrologia
ISSN: 1439-0272
Titre abrégé: Andrologia
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0423506
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
06
05
2020
revised:
24
06
2020
accepted:
28
06
2020
pubmed:
29
7
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
29
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In this study, we compared the weight of the prostate specimen removed after robotic radical prostatectomy with the prostate weight measured pre-operatively by four different imaging modalities. Pre-operative prostate weight before robotic radical prostatectomy was measured by Transabdominal Ultrasonography (TAUS), Transrectal Ultrasonography (TRUS), Abdominal Tomography (CT) and MultiparametricProstate Magnetic Resonance imaging (mpMRI). Of the 170 patients enrolled in the study, the mean age was 65.2 ± 7.08 (46-84) years and mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 9.6 ± 7.7 (1.8-50). The mean post-operative actual prostate weight was 63.1 ± 30 gr. The mean pre-operative prostate volumes measured by TAUS, TRUS, CT and MPMRI were 64.5 ± 28.5, 49.1 ± 30.6, 54.5 ± 30.5 and 68.7 ± 31.7 ml, respectively (p < .001). Post-operative actual prostate weight correlated with prostate weight measured by TAUS, TRUS, CT and mpMRI (r coefficient 0.776, 0.802, 0.768 and 0.825 respectively). The best of these was mpMRI. Although prostate weight measured by different imaging methods has a high correlation to predict actual prostate weight, actual prostate weight is best predicted by measurements with mpMRI. However, errors and deviations that may occur with these imaging methods should be taken into consideration.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e13770Informations de copyright
© 2020 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.
Références
Akbulut, Z., Canda, A. E., Atmaca, A. F., Asil, E., Isgoren, E., & Balbay, M. D. (2011). What if the hand piece spring disassembles during robotic radical prostatectomy? JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 15(2), 275-278. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680811X13071180406916
Bezinque, A., Moriarity, A., Farrell, C., Peabody, H., Noyes, S. L., & Lane, B. R. (2018). Determination of prostate volume: A comparison of contemporary methods. Academic Radiology, 25(12), 1582-1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.03.014
Chernyak, V., Flusberg, M., Kurteva, T., Ghavamian, R., & Rozenblit, A. M. (2015). Accuracy of prostate measurements on MRI with and without an endorectal coil. Clinical Imaging, 39(1), 85-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.09.003
Eri, L. M., Thomassen, H., Brennhovd, B., & Haheim, L. L. (2002). Accuracy and repeatability of prostate volume measurements by transrectal ultrasound. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 5(4), 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500568
Garvey, B., Turkbey, B., Truong, H., Bernardo, M., Periaswamy, S., & Choyke, P. L. (2014). Clinical value of prostate segmentation and volume determination on MRI in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 20(3), 229-233. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2014.13322
Haas, M., Gunzel, K., Miller, K., Hamm, B., Cash, H., & Asbach, P. (2017). Is the ellipsoid formula the new standard for 3-tesla mri prostate volume calculation without endorectal coil? Urologia Internationalis, 98(1), 49-53. https://doi.org/10.1159/000448593
Jeong, C. W., Park, H. K., Hong, S. K., Byun, S. S., Lee, H. J., & Lee, S. E. (2008). Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy. Urologia Internationalis, 81(2), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1159/000144057
Kalkner, K. M., Kubicek, G., Nilsson, J., Lundell, M., Levitt, S., & Nilsson, S. (2006). Prostate volume determination: Differential volume measurements comparing CT and TRUS. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 81(2), 179-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2006.10.003
Kilic, M., Ozdemir, A. T., Altinova, S., Atmaca, A. F., Canda, A. E., & Balbay, M. D. (2014). What is the best radiological method to predict the actual weight of the prostate? Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 44(1), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1205-33
Kim, J. K., Lee, H. J., Hwang, S. I., Choe, G., & Hong, S. K. (2020). Prognostic value of seminal vesicle invasion on preoperative multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in pathological stage T3b prostate cancer. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 5693. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62808-z
Lee, J. S., & Chung, B. H. (2007). Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens. Urologia Internationalis, 78(4), 323-327. https://doi.org/10.1159/000100836
Littrup, P. J., Kane, R. A., Williams, C. R., Egglin, T. K., Lee, F., Torp-Pedersen, S., & Church, P. A. (1991). Determination of prostate volume with transrectal US for cancer screening. Part I. Comparison with prostate-specific antigen assays. Radiology, 178(2), 537-542. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.178.2.1702894
Mazaheri, Y., Goldman, D. A., Di Paolo, P. L., Akin, O., & Hricak, H. (2015). Comparison of prostate volume measured by endorectal coil MRI to prostate specimen volume and mass after radical prostatectomy. Acad Radiol, 22(5), 556-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2015.01.003
McConnell, J. D., Bruskewitz, R., Walsh, P., Andriole, G., Lieber, M., Holtgrewe, H. L., … Waldstreicher, J. (1998). The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Finasteride long-term efficacy and safety study group. New England Journal of Medicine, 338(9), 557-563. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199802263380901
Rodriguez, E. Jr, Skarecky, D., Narula, N., & Ahlering, T. E. (2008). Prostate volume estimation using the ellipsoid formula consistently underestimates actual gland size. Journal of Urology, 179(2), 501-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.083
Roehrborn, C. G., Girman, C. J., Rhodes, T., Hanson, K. A., Collins, G. N., Sech, S. M., … Lieber, M. M. (1997). Correlation between prostate size estimated by digital rectal examination and measured by transrectal ultrasound. Urology, 49(4), 548-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00031-9
Sajadi, K. P., Terris, M. K., Hamilton, R. J., Cullen, J., Amling, C. L., Kane, C. J., … Freedland, S. J. (2007). Body mass index, prostate weight and transrectal ultrasound prostate volume accuracy. Journal of Urology, 178(3), 990-995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.049
Toth, R., Bloch, B. N., Genega, E. M., Rofsky, N. M., Lenkinski, R. E., Rosen, M. A., … Madabhushi, A. (2011). Accurate prostate volume estimation using multifeature active shape models on T2-weighted MRI. Academic Radiology, 18(6), 745-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2011.01.016