Impact of a Topical Anaesthesia Wound Management Formulation on Pain, Inflammation and Reduction of Secondary Infections after Tail Docking in Lambs.
cortisol
lambs
pain response
serum amyloid A
tail docking
wound infection
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jul 2020
24 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
29
06
2020
revised:
21
07
2020
accepted:
22
07
2020
entrez:
30
7
2020
pubmed:
30
7
2020
medline:
30
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We examined several procedures for surgical tail docking; with and without general anaesthesia (GA), including the use of a topical wound gel formulation to provide pain relief (PR) and improve healing after surgery, containing local anaesthetics lignocaine and bupivacaine, with cetrimide and adrenalin. Forty-four lambs were recruited into four equal cohorts: Groups A and C, the tail was excised with a scalpel without anaesthesia or stitches; Groups B and D, the tail was surgically excised and stitched under GA; Groups C and D wounds were immediately sprayed with PR. Behavioural observations identified that Groups A and C displayed significantly less pain-related behaviours than Groups B and D shortly after the procedure, especially if treated with PR. Similarly, the mean of days when animals showed no signs of wound infection was longer in the groups not undergoing stitching. Finally, treatment with PR appeared to reduce the cortisol response and avoided the elevation of serum amyloid A in lambs where the tail was excised without general anaesthesia. In conclusion, surgical tail-docking without GA but where wounds are immediately sprayed with PR, appears as an affordable and more welfare-appropriate method for conducting tail docking in lambs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32722010
pii: ani10081255
doi: 10.3390/ani10081255
pmc: PMC7459688
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Aragón Government
ID : A15_17R, Construyendo Aragón 2016-20
Références
Res Vet Sci. 1992 May;52(3):389-90
pubmed: 1620975
Vet Res. 2004 Mar-Apr;35(2):163-87
pubmed: 15099494
Aust Vet J. 2010 Mar;88(3):67-74
pubmed: 20402687
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2011 Mar;38(2):134-45
pubmed: 21303445
Aust Vet J. 2008 May;86(5):159-68; quiz CE1
pubmed: 18454833
Vet Rec. 1994 Apr 30;134(18):463-7
pubmed: 8059511
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1998 Jan 1;212(1):61-6
pubmed: 9426779
Vet J. 2004 Jul;168(1):28-40
pubmed: 15158206
Aust Vet J. 2000 Dec;78(12):838-42
pubmed: 11194472
J Anim Sci. 1997 Jan;75(1):266-72
pubmed: 9027575
Animal. 2016 Jan;10(1):150-6
pubmed: 26215042
Animals (Basel). 2020 Feb 17;10(2):
pubmed: 32079225
J Proteomics. 2012 Jul 19;75(14):4207-31
pubmed: 22521269
J Endocrinol. 2002 Apr;173(1):113-22
pubmed: 11927390
Int Wound J. 2019 Aug;16(4):968-973
pubmed: 30938098
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008 Oct 1;233(7):1096-104
pubmed: 18828720
Res Vet Sci. 1999 Apr;66(2):107-18
pubmed: 10208888
J Anim Sci. 1987 Nov;65(5):1220-7
pubmed: 3320004
Res Vet Sci. 2018 Jun;118:270-277
pubmed: 29539592
Aust Vet J. 2007 Mar;85(3):98-106
pubmed: 17359309
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jan 22;6:514
pubmed: 32039253
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2003 Aug;35(4):351-63
pubmed: 14509541
Vet J. 1998 Jan;155(1):39-51
pubmed: 9455158
Aust Vet J. 2013 Apr;91(4):160-7
pubmed: 23521101