A Genetic Evaluation System for New Zealand White Rabbit Germplasm Resources Based on SSR Markers.
conservation effect
genetic diversity
microsatellite
rabbit
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jul 2020
24 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
06
07
2020
revised:
15
07
2020
accepted:
22
07
2020
entrez:
30
7
2020
pubmed:
30
7
2020
medline:
30
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
At present, there is an abundance of quality domestic rabbit breeds in China. However, due to the lack of technical standards for the genetic evaluation of rabbit germplasm resources, there have been a number of problems, such as poor breed conservation. By studying the genetic diversity of 130 New Zealand white rabbits (regardless of generation), we obtained the best simple sequence repeat (SSR) marker combination. We found that, when using microsatellite markers for the effective genetic evaluation of domestic rabbits, the number of records should be greater than 60 and the marker number more than 22. Through the comparative analysis of 30 combinations of 22 markers, the optimal combination of 22 markers was determined, and the 22 SSR polymorphic loci were distributed on different chromosomes. We performed a genetic analysis of 200 New Zealand white rabbits corresponding to two generations, using the best SSR polymorphic loci combination. There were no significant differences in the genetic diversity parameters between the two generations of rabbits (
Identifiants
pubmed: 32722175
pii: ani10081258
doi: 10.3390/ani10081258
pmc: PMC7460188
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Modern Agricultural Industrial System Special Funding
ID : CARS-43-A-1
Organisme : the Science and Technology Major Project of New Variety Breeding (Livestock and Poultry) of Zhejiang Province, China
ID : 2016C02054-10
Références
Mol Psychiatry. 2000 Jan;5(1):77-84
pubmed: 10673772
Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Nov 11;23(21):4407-14
pubmed: 7501463
J Anim Breed Genet. 2011 Dec;128(6):465-72
pubmed: 22059580
Br J Exp Pathol. 1988 Apr;69(2):235-44
pubmed: 3377964
J Anim Breed Genet. 2012 Jun;129(3):234-43
pubmed: 22583328
Hereditas. 1999;130(3):309-15
pubmed: 10509140
Anim Genet. 1996 Dec;27(6):387-95
pubmed: 9022153
Mol Ecol. 1999 Feb;8(2):299-307
pubmed: 10065544
Mol Gen Genet. 1995 Nov 1;249(1):65-73
pubmed: 8552035
Animals (Basel). 2020 Feb 05;10(2):
pubmed: 32033449
Mamm Genome. 2005 Jun;16(6):442-59
pubmed: 16075371
Genetics. 1974 Feb;76(2):379-90
pubmed: 4822472
Proc Nutr Soc. 1975 May;34(1):75-83
pubmed: 1096157
Animals (Basel). 2019 Sep 27;9(10):
pubmed: 31569822
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Feb;63(2):357-60
pubmed: 19060292
Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Aug 25;17(16):6463-71
pubmed: 2780284
Anim Biotechnol. 2019 Jul;30(3):242-251
pubmed: 29938587
J Mol Evol. 1985;22(2):160-74
pubmed: 3934395
Genetics. 1978 Jul;89(3):583-90
pubmed: 17248844
Nat Genet. 1994 Jun;7(2 Spec No):246-339
pubmed: 7545953
EXS. 1994;68:381-95
pubmed: 8032137
Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Jan;8(1):103-6
pubmed: 21585727
Anim Genet. 1997 Feb;28(1):58-9
pubmed: 9124711
Anim Genet. 2009 Feb;40(1):65-72
pubmed: 19076935
Animals (Basel). 2020 Apr 01;10(4):
pubmed: 32244771
Anim Genet. 1994 Oct;25(5):367
pubmed: 7818179
Mol Ecol. 2003 Mar;12(3):789-94
pubmed: 12675833
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Dec 16;10(1):741
pubmed: 29246260
Anim Genet. 2009 Jun;40(3):333-43
pubmed: 19222436
Science. 2004 May 21;304(5674):1160-4
pubmed: 15155949
Science. 1993 Apr 30;260(5108):670-2
pubmed: 8480176