Enhancement of Soft Tissue Sarcoma Response to Gemcitabine through Timed Administration of a Short-Acting Anti-Angiogenic Agent.


Journal

Cellular physiology and biochemistry : international journal of experimental cellular physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology
ISSN: 1421-9778
Titre abrégé: Cell Physiol Biochem
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9113221

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Jul 2020
Historique:
accepted: 10 07 2020
entrez: 30 7 2020
pubmed: 30 7 2020
medline: 13 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite enormous effort, anti-angiogenic drugs have not lived up to the promise of globally-enhancing anti-cancer therapies. Clinically, anti-angiogenic drugs have been used to persistently suppress vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in order to "normalize" dysfunctional neo-angiogenic microvasculature and prevent recruitment of endothelial progenitors. Recently, we showed that a 1h pre-treatment with anti-angiogenic drugs prior to ultra-high single dose radiotherapy and specific chemotherapies transiently de-represses acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase), leading to enhanced cancer therapy-induced, ceramide-mediated vascular injury and tumor response. Here we formally decipher parameters of chemotherapy induction of endothelial sphingolipid signaling events and define principles for optimizing anti-angiogenic chemosensitization. These studies examine the antimetabolite chemotherapeutic gemcitabine in soft tissue sarcoma (STS), a clinically-relevant combination. Initial studies address the theoretic problem that anti-angiogenic drugs such as bevacizumab, an IgG with a 3-week half-life, have the potential for accumulating during the 3-week chemotherapeutic cycles currently standard-of-care for STS treatment. We show that anti-angiogenic ASMase-dependent enhancement of the response of MCA/129 fibrosarcomas in sv129/BL6 mice to gemcitabine progressively diminishes as the level of the VEGFR2 inhibitor DC101, an IgG, accumulates, suggesting a short-acting anti-angiogenic drug might be preferable in multi-cycle chemotherapeutic regimens. Further, we show lenvatinib, a VEGFR2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a short half-life, to be superior to DC101, enhancing gemcitabine-induced endothelial cell apoptosis and tumor response in a multi-cycle treatment schedule. We posit that a single delivery of a short-acting anti-angiogenic agent at 1h preceding each dose of gemcitabine and other chemotherapies may be more efficacious for repeated sensitization of the ASMase pathway in multi-cycle chemotherapy regimens than current treatment strategies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/AIMS OBJECTIVE
Despite enormous effort, anti-angiogenic drugs have not lived up to the promise of globally-enhancing anti-cancer therapies. Clinically, anti-angiogenic drugs have been used to persistently suppress vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in order to "normalize" dysfunctional neo-angiogenic microvasculature and prevent recruitment of endothelial progenitors. Recently, we showed that a 1h pre-treatment with anti-angiogenic drugs prior to ultra-high single dose radiotherapy and specific chemotherapies transiently de-represses acid sphingomyelinase (ASMase), leading to enhanced cancer therapy-induced, ceramide-mediated vascular injury and tumor response. Here we formally decipher parameters of chemotherapy induction of endothelial sphingolipid signaling events and define principles for optimizing anti-angiogenic chemosensitization.
METHODS METHODS
These studies examine the antimetabolite chemotherapeutic gemcitabine in soft tissue sarcoma (STS), a clinically-relevant combination.
RESULTS RESULTS
Initial studies address the theoretic problem that anti-angiogenic drugs such as bevacizumab, an IgG with a 3-week half-life, have the potential for accumulating during the 3-week chemotherapeutic cycles currently standard-of-care for STS treatment. We show that anti-angiogenic ASMase-dependent enhancement of the response of MCA/129 fibrosarcomas in sv129/BL6 mice to gemcitabine progressively diminishes as the level of the VEGFR2 inhibitor DC101, an IgG, accumulates, suggesting a short-acting anti-angiogenic drug might be preferable in multi-cycle chemotherapeutic regimens. Further, we show lenvatinib, a VEGFR2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a short half-life, to be superior to DC101, enhancing gemcitabine-induced endothelial cell apoptosis and tumor response in a multi-cycle treatment schedule.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
We posit that a single delivery of a short-acting anti-angiogenic agent at 1h preceding each dose of gemcitabine and other chemotherapies may be more efficacious for repeated sensitization of the ASMase pathway in multi-cycle chemotherapy regimens than current treatment strategies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32722909
doi: 10.33594/000000250
pmc: PMC8567213
mid: NIHMS1705713
doi:

Substances chimiques

Angiogenesis Inhibitors 0
Antibodies, Monoclonal 0
Antineoplastic Agents 0
DC101 monoclonal antibody 0
Phenylurea Compounds 0
Quinolines 0
Deoxycytidine 0W860991D6
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 EC 2.7.10.1
Sphingomyelin Phosphodiesterase EC 3.1.4.12
lenvatinib EE083865G2
Gemcitabine 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

707-718

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant Program (NCI OMNIBUS R21)
ID : 11950073
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© Copyright by the Author(s). Published by Cell Physiol Biochem Press.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Patents unrelated to this work: RK (US7195775B1, US7850984B2, US10052387B2, US8562993B2, US9592238B2, US20150216971A1, and US20170335014A1, US20170333413A1, US20180015183A1, US10414533B2, US10450385B2), ZF (US 10413533B2, US20170333413A1, and US20180015183A1).Richard Kolesnick and Zvi Fuks are co-funders of Ceramedix Holding L.L.C. The remaining authors have declared that no conflicts of interest exist.

Références

JAMA. 2015 Feb 17;313(7):695-706
pubmed: 25688781
Cancer Cell. 2008 Sep 9;14(3):263-73
pubmed: 18772115
Cell Signal. 2017 Jan;29:52-61
pubmed: 27702691
J Clin Invest. 2012 May;122(5):1786-90
pubmed: 22466649
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 30;5(9):
pubmed: 20941382
Cell. 1996 Jul 26;86(2):189-99
pubmed: 8706124
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 May 01;11:3847-3860
pubmed: 31118801
Sarcoma. 2015;2015:532478
pubmed: 26074722
Cancer Res. 1986 Mar;46(3):1120-3
pubmed: 3943089
Biologics. 2014 Apr 10;8:129-39
pubmed: 24748771
Cancer Cell. 2005 Aug;8(2):89-91
pubmed: 16098459
Science. 2003 May 16;300(5622):1155-9
pubmed: 12750523
Blood. 2010 Nov 18;116(20):4095-8
pubmed: 20713962
Curr Biol. 2016 Nov 7;26(21):R1161-R1166
pubmed: 27825457
FEBS Lett. 2010 May 3;584(9):1728-40
pubmed: 20178791
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1999 Oct;125(10):577-81
pubmed: 10473871
Cancer Res. 2011 Dec 1;71(23):7226-37
pubmed: 21900397
Ann Oncol. 2013 Dec;24(12):2943-52
pubmed: 23921791
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 1;29(19):2660-6
pubmed: 21606412
Science. 2005 Jan 7;307(5706):58-62
pubmed: 15637262
Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2011 Nov;11(9):911-9
pubmed: 21707481
Cancer Cell. 2014 Nov 10;26(5):605-22
pubmed: 25517747
J Biol Chem. 1998 Feb 13;273(7):4081-8
pubmed: 9461601
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Apr 15;17(8):2528-37
pubmed: 21372218
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jun;13(6):545-56
pubmed: 24685276
Lancet. 2016 Jul 30;388(10043):518-29
pubmed: 26853587
Ann Oncol. 2004 Aug;15(8):1261-6
pubmed: 15277268
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 10;27(29):4865-73
pubmed: 19704059
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug;6(8):465-77
pubmed: 19581909
Lancet. 2015 Jun 13;385(9985):2355-62
pubmed: 25819691
Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jun;10(6):520-9
pubmed: 21571593
Science. 2019 Jul 26;365(6451):386-392
pubmed: 31273070
Cell Signal. 2017 Jun;34:86-91
pubmed: 28238856
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Apr;111(1):88-93
pubmed: 24794795
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 1;25(19):2755-63
pubmed: 17602081
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Oct;10(10):967-74
pubmed: 19767240
Br J Cancer. 2012 May 8;106(10):1598-604
pubmed: 22516948
Cancer. 2001 Apr 15;91(8):1525-9
pubmed: 11301401
Biol Chem. 2015 Jun;396(6-7):737-47
pubmed: 25838296
Vasc Cell. 2014 Sep 06;6:18
pubmed: 25197551
Oncologist. 2010;15(8):819-25
pubmed: 20688807
CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jan-Feb;64(1):9-29
pubmed: 24399786
Cancer Control. 2018 Jan-Dec;25(1):1073274818789361
pubmed: 30032643
Chem Phys Lipids. 1999 Nov;102(1-2):123-30
pubmed: 11001566
Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Oct 20;9:6467-6477
pubmed: 27799794

Auteurs

Jin Cheng (J)

Laboratory of Signal Transduction, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

John Fuller (J)

Laboratory of Signal Transduction, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Regina Feldman (R)

Laboratory of Signal Transduction, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

William Tap (W)

Sarcoma Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Takashi Owa (T)

Oncology Business Group, Eisai Co Ltd, Koishikawa, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Zvi Fuks (Z)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Richard Kolesnick (R)

Laboratory of Signal Transduction, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, r-kolesnick@ski.mskcc.org.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH