A Cohort Study of Emergency Surgery Caseload and Regional Anesthesia Provision at a Tertiary UK Hospital During the Initial COVID-19 Pandemic.

covid-19 emergency surgery personal protective equipment regional anesthesia

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Jun 2020
Historique:
entrez: 30 7 2020
pubmed: 30 7 2020
medline: 30 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Study objective  Analysis of emergency cases performed during initial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the proportion completed under regional anesthesia (RA). Design Cohort study comparing surgical caseload during initial seven-week COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Comparison was made with pre-COVID-19 caseload over the corresponding seven-week timeframe in 2019. Setting The setting of the study was emergency surgery theaters at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Patients All patients requiring emergency surgery over the defined study period were reviewed with the exception of obstetric and pediatric populations. Interventions Surgical caseload for 2020 and 2019 cohorts established using the Galaxy IT system used to log all operations. All relevant anesthetic charts for the 2020 cohort were subsequently reviewed to ascertain perioperative use of RA. Measurements The type of block, mode of approach, experience of the operator, personal protective equipment (PPE) worn, block complications, type of sedation and complications were entered into database. Main results A total of 338 emergency surgical cases were performed during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, compared to 603 cases over the corresponding period in 2019. This showed a 44% decrease in emergency surgical workload. There was a marked disparity in reduction of surgical caseload by surgical subspecialty. Trauma (137 vs 66 cases), a 52% decrease, and general surgery (193 vs 64 cases), a 66% decrease, were the most pronounced, and explanations for this are explored. RA was performed in 34% (26% as primary technique) of cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of RA as the primary anesthesia technique was noticeably higher than previous UK data (11%), and was prominent in specialties such as general surgery, gynecology and urology, not traditionally completed under RA. Conclusions Surgical RA (and general anesthesia avoidance) has a significant role in the future to ensure high-quality perioperative care for patients whilst minimizing exposure to staff and utilization of scarce resources (PPE).

Identifiants

pubmed: 32724732
doi: 10.7759/cureus.8781
pmc: PMC7381872
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e8781

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020, Wade et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Amit Pawa is President of RA-UK.

Références

Chin Med Sci J. 2020 Feb 27;:
pubmed: 32102726
JAMA. 2020 Mar 13;:
pubmed: 32167538
Anaesthesia. 2020 Apr 28;:
pubmed: 32344456
Anaesthesia. 2014 Oct;69(10):1089-101
pubmed: 25204236
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jul;125(1):e28-e37
pubmed: 32312571
JAMA. 2020 Feb 24;:
pubmed: 32091533
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Mar 1;28(5):e213-e221
pubmed: 31478916
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
Updates Surg. 2020 Jun;72(2):309-310
pubmed: 32328880
Br J Anaesth. 2020 May 28;:
pubmed: 32532429
J Med Virol. 2020 Apr;92(4):401-402
pubmed: 31950516
Anaesthesia. 2008 Aug;63(8):822-32
pubmed: 18547291

Auteurs

Stuart Wade (S)

Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.

Ganeshkrishna Nair (G)

Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.

Hafis A Ayeni (HA)

Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.

Amit Pawa (A)

Anaesthesia, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.

Classifications MeSH