Pediatric trauma primary survey performance among surgical and non-surgical pediatric providers in a Brazilian trauma center.
child
clinical protocols
education
wounds and injuries
Journal
Trauma surgery & acute care open
ISSN: 2397-5776
Titre abrégé: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101698646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
29
01
2020
revised:
05
05
2020
accepted:
13
06
2020
entrez:
30
7
2020
pubmed:
30
7
2020
medline:
30
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Trauma is the leading cause of death and disability among Brazilian children and adolescents. Trauma protocols such as those developed by the Advanced Trauma Life Support course are widely taught, but few studies have assessed the degree to which the use of protocolized trauma assessment improves outcomes. This study aims to quantify the adherence of trauma assessment protocols among different types of frontline trauma providers. A prospective observational study of pediatric trauma care in one of the busiest Latin American trauma centers was conducted during 6 months. Trauma primary survey assessments were observed and adherence to each step of a standardized primary assessment protocol was recorded. Adherence to the assessment protocol was compared among different types of providers, the time of presentation and severity of injury. The relationship between protocol adherence and clinical outcomes including mortality, length of hospital stay, admission to pediatric intensive care unit, use of blood components, mechanical ventilation and number of imaging exams performed in the first 24 hours were also assessed. Emergency department evaluations of 64 patients out of 274 pediatric admissions were observed over a period of 6 months. 50% of the primary assessments were performed by general surgeons, 34.4% by residents in general surgery and 15.6% by pediatricians. There was an average adherence rate of 34.1% to the trauma protocol. Adherence among each specific step included airway: 17.2%; breathing: 59.4%; circulation: 95.3%; disability: 28.8%; exposure: 18.8%. No differences between specialties were observed. Patients with a more thorough primary assessment underwent fewer CT scans (receiver operating characteristic curve area: 0.661; p=0.027). Our study demonstrates that trauma assessment protocol adherence among trauma providers is low. Thorough initial assessment reduced the use of CT scans suggesting that standardized pediatric trauma assessments may be a way to reduce unnecessary radiological imaging among children. IV. Pediatric and global trauma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32724859
doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000451
pii: tsaco-2020-000451
pmc: PMC7375395
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e000451Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2001 Jun;17(3):170-4
pubmed: 11437140
Injury. 2013 Jan;44(1):97-103
pubmed: 22153117
World J Emerg Surg. 2013 Dec 05;8(1):52
pubmed: 24305495
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Jan;52(1):3-15
pubmed: 27856009
Indian Pediatr. 2018 Mar 15;55(3):259
pubmed: 29629703
Resuscitation. 2013 Jan;84(1):66-71
pubmed: 22781213
Acta Cir Bras. 2017 Jul;32(7):587-598
pubmed: 28793043
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Feb;53(2):367-371
pubmed: 29103789
BMJ. 2008 Sep 22;337:a1501
pubmed: 18809587
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;21(10):1129-34
pubmed: 25308136
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014 Sep;69(9):601-7
pubmed: 25318091
Acta Cir Bras. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):7-11
pubmed: 16491215
Injury. 2016 Mar;47(3):574-85
pubmed: 26794709
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Jun;163(6):512-8
pubmed: 19487606
Invest Radiol. 2020 Jan;55(1):8-19
pubmed: 31567618
Pediatrics. 2003 Oct;112(4):951-7
pubmed: 14523191
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2015 Jul-Aug;42(4):220-3
pubmed: 26517796
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Sep;54(9):1854-1860
pubmed: 30736956