Global Quality Standard for Identification and Management of Severe Asthma.
Guideline-directed medical therapy
Health care policy
Patient advocacy
Patient care
Quality care standards
Risk reduction
Severe asthma
Journal
Advances in therapy
ISSN: 1865-8652
Titre abrégé: Adv Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8611864
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
received:
18
06
2020
pubmed:
30
7
2020
medline:
16
2
2021
entrez:
30
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Severe asthma is a debilitating, life-threatening disease associated with substantial global morbidity, mortality, and health care resource utilization. Patients may not receive guideline-directed medical care for severe asthma. Moreover, viable precision-based assessment tools and newer preventive therapies that can reduce the frequency of exacerbations and associated functional impact are underused. As a result, high rates of poorly controlled severe asthma persist, and patient health-related quality of life suffers. In 2019, the Improve Access to Better Care Task Force of the PRECISION Steering Committee set out to develop a global template on quality standards for severe asthma care to support improved access to and delivery of quality care. This Quality Standard is grounded in the vast body of published evidence available for severe asthma care, published clinical guidelines (i.e., from the Global Initiative for Asthma in 2019 and the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society in 2014), and the 2018 PRECISION-supported Charter to Improve Patient Care in Severe Asthma. The Quality Standard developed emphasizes four key elements aimed at optimizing clinical care and outcomes in severe asthma: (1) organization of services, (2) timely identification and referral for suspected severe asthma, (3) specialized assessment and management of severe asthma to optimize outcomes, and (4) patient-centric care and shared decision-making that is reflective of the patient's expectations, priorities, and values. Four key Quality Statements are provided, along with quality metrics and strategies for local adaptation to optimize implementation. This Global Quality Standard is intended to mobilize policymakers, health care providers, and patient advocacy groups to build consensus on the definition and expectations of quality care in severe asthma, to promote patient-centric care, to identify gaps in care and areas for improvement, and systematically implement improvement measures and outcomes and to reduce the burden of illness for patients with severe asthma. Although only 10% of patients with asthma have severe disease, these patients use up to half of all health care resources used to treat asthma. For the patient, severe asthma is associated with substantial morbidity, increased risk of death, and poor quality of life. Effective treatments for severe asthma are available, yet access to these treatments varies for many patients around the globe, and they are not always used effectively when available. A task force of leading global asthma experts was recently assembled to develop global standards to support improved access and delivery of quality care for patients with severe asthma. The task force identified four key elements to optimize management and outcomes: (1) coordination of services, (2) timely detection and referral of patients with severe asthma, (3) use of guideline-recommended assessments and therapies, and (4) integration of patient expectations and values when making treatment decisions. This Quality Standard details each of these elements by providing supporting rationale, ways to measure improvements in each area, and strategies to implement these elements at local clinics around the world. Ultimately, this Quality Standard is intended to help policymakers, health care providers, patient advocacy groups, and other key stakeholders build consensus on the requirements for quality care in severe asthma to improve patient care while also reducing the overall global burden of severe asthma.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Although only 10% of patients with asthma have severe disease, these patients use up to half of all health care resources used to treat asthma. For the patient, severe asthma is associated with substantial morbidity, increased risk of death, and poor quality of life. Effective treatments for severe asthma are available, yet access to these treatments varies for many patients around the globe, and they are not always used effectively when available. A task force of leading global asthma experts was recently assembled to develop global standards to support improved access and delivery of quality care for patients with severe asthma. The task force identified four key elements to optimize management and outcomes: (1) coordination of services, (2) timely detection and referral of patients with severe asthma, (3) use of guideline-recommended assessments and therapies, and (4) integration of patient expectations and values when making treatment decisions. This Quality Standard details each of these elements by providing supporting rationale, ways to measure improvements in each area, and strategies to implement these elements at local clinics around the world. Ultimately, this Quality Standard is intended to help policymakers, health care providers, patient advocacy groups, and other key stakeholders build consensus on the requirements for quality care in severe asthma to improve patient care while also reducing the overall global burden of severe asthma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32725419
doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01450-7
pii: 10.1007/s12325-020-01450-7
pmc: PMC7444397
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Asthmatic Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
3645-3659Investigateurs
Hannah Saul
(H)
Tonya Winders
(T)
Giorgio Walter Winders
(GW)
Pascal Chanez
(P)
Janwillem Kocks
(J)
John Haughney
(J)
Steve Holmes
(S)
Adel Mansur
(A)
Andres Menzies-Gow
(A)
Yuji Tohda
(Y)
Cynthia Hallensleben
(C)
Grainne d'Ancona
(G)
Sam Prigmore
(S)
Esther Metting
(E)
Références
Global Asthma Network. The global asthma report 2018. Auckland, New Zealand: Global Asthma Network, 2018. https://www.globalasthmareport.org/Global%2520Asthma%2520Report%25202018.pdf . Accessed Mar 5, 2020.
Vos T, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, et al. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1211–59.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2
Hay SI, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, et al. GBD 2016 DALYs and HALE Collaborators. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1260–344.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32130-X
World Allergy Organization. The management of severe asthma: economic analysis of the cost of treatments for severe asthma. 2005. https://www.worldallergy.org/educational_programs/world_allergy_forum/anaheim2005/blaiss.php . Accessed Mar 5, 2020.
D’Amato G, Vitale C, Molina A, et al. Asthma-related deaths. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2016;11:37.
doi: 10.1186/s40248-016-0073-0
Price D, Bjermer L, Bergin DA, Martinez R. Asthma referrals: a key component of asthma management that needs to be addressed. J Asthma Allergy. 2017;10:209–23.
doi: 10.2147/JAA.S134300
Royal College of Physicians. Why asthma still kills. The National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD). Confidential Enquiry report. London: Royal College of Physicians; May 2014. https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/why-asthma-still-kills . Accessed Mar 5, 2020.
Heaney LG, Robinson DS. Severe asthma treatment: need for characterising patients. Lancet. 2005;365(9463):974–6.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71087-4
Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. Updated 2020. www.ginasthma.org . Accessed July 8, 2020.
Lefebvre P, Duh MS, Lafeuille MH, et al. Acute and chronic systemic corticosteroid-related complications in patients with severe asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(6):1488–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2015.07.046 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.07.046
pubmed: 26414880
Tran TN, King E, Sarkar R, et al. Oral corticosteroid prescription patterns for asthma in France, Germany, Italy, and the UK. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(6):1902363.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.02363-2019
Bhandori K, Doyle-Waters MM, Marra C, et al. Economic burden of asthma: a systematic review. BMC Pulm Med. 2009;9:24.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-9-24
Menzies-Gow A, Canonica GW, Winders TA, Correia Sousa J, Upham JW, Fink-Wagner AH. A charter to improve patient care in severe asthma. Adv Ther. 2018;35:1485–96.
doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0777-y
Chung KF, Wenzel SE, Brozek JL, et al. International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur Respir J. 2014;43:343–73.
doi: 10.1183/09031936.00202013
Sulaiman I, Greene G, MacHale E, et al. A randomised clinical trial of feedback on inhaler adherence and technique in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. Eur Respir J. 2018;51(1):1701126.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.01126-2017
Merchant RK, Inamdar R, Quade RC. Effectiveness of population health management using the propeller health asthma platform: a randomized clinical trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016;4(3):455–63.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.11.022