Safety and Efficacy of Different Doses and Regimens of Faricimab vs Ranibizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The AVENUE Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Aged
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Antibodies, Monoclonal
/ administration & dosage
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Female
Humans
Intravitreal Injections
Male
Middle Aged
Ranibizumab
/ administration & dosage
Tomography, Optical Coherence
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Visual Acuity
Wet Macular Degeneration
/ diagnosis
Journal
JAMA ophthalmology
ISSN: 2168-6173
Titre abrégé: JAMA Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2020
01 09 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
31
7
2020
medline:
24
2
2021
entrez:
31
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Faricimab, the first bispecific antibody designed for intraocular use, simultaneously and independently binds and neutralizes angiopoietin 2 (Ang-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). To assess the efficacy and safety of different doses and regimens of faricimab vs ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). AVENUE was a 36-week, multiple-dose-regimen, active comparator-controlled, double-masked, phase 2 randomized clinical study performed at 58 sites in the United States. Eligible participants were anti-VEGF treatment naive with choroidal neovascularization secondary to nAMD and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score of 73 (Snellen equivalent, 20/40) to 24 (Snellen equivalent, 20/320). Data were collected from August 11, 2015, to January 12, 2017, with the final patient visit completed September 26, 2017. Data were analyzed from August 11, 2015, to October 4, 2019. Patients were randomized 3:2:2:2:3 to receive ranibizumab, 0.5 mg every 4 weeks (arm A [n = 68]); faricimab, 1.5 mg every 4 weeks (arm B [n = 47]); faricimab, 6.0 mg every 4 weeks (arm C [n = 42]); faricimab, 6.0 mg every 4 weeks until week 12, then faricimab, 6.0 mg every 8 weeks (arm D [n = 47]); and ranibizumab, 0.5 mg every 4 weeks until week 8, then faricimab, 6.0 mg every 4 weeks (arm E [n = 69]). Mean change in BCVA from baseline to week 36, proportion of participants gaining at least 15 letters, BCVA of 20/40 or better or 20/200 or worse, and ocular coherence tomographic outcomes in anti-VEGF treatment-naive participants (arms A, B, C, D) and from weeks 12 to 36 in those with incomplete response (participants in arms A and E with week 12 BCVA ETDRS letter score of ≤68 [Snellen equivalent, 20/50 or worse]). A total of 263 participants were included in the analysis (172 [65.4%] female; 258 [98.1%] white; mean [SD] age, 78.3 [8.7] years). At week 36, adjusted mean change in BCVA vs ranibizumab was 1.6 (80% CI, -1.6 to 4.7) letters for arm B (P = .52), -1.6 (80% CI, -4.9 to 1.7) letters for arm C (P = .53), and -1.5 (80% CI, -4.6 to 1.6) letters for arm D (P = .53). For arm E, adjusted mean change from week 12 was -1.7 (80% CI, -3.8 to 0.4) letters (P = .30). AVENUE did not meet its primary end point of superiority of faricimab over ranibizumab in BCVA at week 36. Although not superior to monthly ranibizumab as given in this trial, overall visual and anatomical gains noted with faricimab support pursuing phase 3 trials for a potential alternative to monthly anti-VEGF therapy. Faricimab showed no new or unexpected safety signals. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02484690.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32729888
pii: 2768856
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2685
pmc: PMC7393587
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Ranibizumab
ZL1R02VT79
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02484690']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
955-963Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 04;3:CD005139
pubmed: 30834517
Ophthalmology. 2014 Jan;121(1):193-201
pubmed: 24084500
Retina. 2013 Mar;33(3):474-81
pubmed: 23266880
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Feb;24(2-a Suppl):S3-S15
pubmed: 29383980
EMBO Mol Med. 2016 Nov 2;8(11):1265-1288
pubmed: 27742718
EMBO Mol Med. 2019 May;11(5):
pubmed: 31040126
Nat Med. 2006 Feb;12(2):235-9
pubmed: 16462802
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 5;108(27):11187-92
pubmed: 21690412
Ophthalmology. 2018 Apr;125(4):522-528
pubmed: 29146306
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;99(2):220-6
pubmed: 25193672
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 5;355(14):1432-44
pubmed: 17021319
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;100(8):1052-7
pubmed: 26541435
Ophthalmology. 2011 May;118(5):831-9
pubmed: 21146229
Nat Rev Cancer. 2010 Aug;10(8):575-85
pubmed: 20651738
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 19;364(20):1897-908
pubmed: 21526923
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016 Jun;15(6):385-403
pubmed: 26775688
Retina. 2016 May;36(5):859-67
pubmed: 26529555
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 5;355(14):1419-31
pubmed: 17021318
Ophthalmology. 2019 Aug;126(8):1155-1170
pubmed: 30905643
Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;91(6):540-6
pubmed: 23171290
Ophthalmology. 2013 May;120(5):1046-56
pubmed: 23352196
Nat Med. 2006 Feb;12(2):171-2
pubmed: 16462798
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 1;138(9):964-972
pubmed: 32729897
Ophthalmol Retina. 2018 Jul;2(7):645-653
pubmed: 31047372
Ophthalmology. 2012 Dec;119(12):2537-48
pubmed: 23084240
EMBO Mol Med. 2019 May;11(5):
pubmed: 31040127
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Mol Vis. 2002 Apr 21;8:119-26
pubmed: 11979237
Ophthalmology. 2020 Jan;127(1):72-84
pubmed: 30986442
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017 Sep;16(9):635-661
pubmed: 28529319
Ophthalmology. 2017 Sep;124(9):1296-1304
pubmed: 28551167
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015 Nov;49:67-81
pubmed: 26113211
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 05;8(8):e70459
pubmed: 23940579
Ophthalmology. 2008 Sep;115(9):1480-8, 1488.e1-2
pubmed: 18486216
Ophthalmol Retina. 2017 Nov - Dec;1(6):474-485
pubmed: 31047438
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Jul;1347:45-51
pubmed: 25773744