Revealing the structure of information flows discriminates similar animal social behaviors.
coptotermes formosanus
ecology
information theory
physics of living systems
reticulitermes speratus
social behavior
temnothorax rugatulus
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 07 2020
30 07 2020
Historique:
received:
23
01
2020
accepted:
09
07
2020
entrez:
31
7
2020
pubmed:
31
7
2020
medline:
13
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Behavioral correlations stretching over time are an essential but often neglected aspect of interactions among animals. These correlations pose a challenge to current behavioral-analysis methods that lack effective means to analyze complex series of interactions. Here we show that non-invasive information-theoretic tools can be used to reveal communication protocols that guide complex social interactions by measuring simultaneous flows of different types of information between subjects. We demonstrate this approach by showing that the tandem-running behavior of the ant Social animals continuously influence each other’s behavior. Most of these interactions simply consist in an individual immediately responding to the behavior of another in a predictable way. Still, when the same individuals interact over long periods, complex social interactions can arise. These can be difficult for scientists to study, because how animals behave at a given moment depends on their shared history. Certain species of ants and termites use smell and touch to do ‘tandem runs’ and move in pairs through the environment. Only ants, however, can learn a new route from their running partner. Understanding how this difference arises means examining how the animals interact and communicate over longer time scales. This requires new approaches to capture how information flows between the insects. Here, Valentini et al. used a scientific methodology known as information theory to study tandem running in one species of ants and two species of termites. Information theory provides a framework to quantify how information is shared, processed and stored. The flow of information between individuals was measured separately for different aspects of tandem running. At small time scales, ant and termite behavior appeared identical, but over longer periods, it was possible to distinguish between the two types of insects. In termites, only one individual in a pair sent information to the other to instruct the second termite where to go. By contrast, in ants, both members of the tandem communicated with each other in a way that was consistent with how humans acknowledge information they receive from other individuals. The approach used by Valentini et al. will be useful to researchers who study how complex and often cryptic social interactions develop over extended periods in social animals. This framework could also be applied in other systems such as groups of cells, or economic networks.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Social animals continuously influence each other’s behavior. Most of these interactions simply consist in an individual immediately responding to the behavior of another in a predictable way. Still, when the same individuals interact over long periods, complex social interactions can arise. These can be difficult for scientists to study, because how animals behave at a given moment depends on their shared history. Certain species of ants and termites use smell and touch to do ‘tandem runs’ and move in pairs through the environment. Only ants, however, can learn a new route from their running partner. Understanding how this difference arises means examining how the animals interact and communicate over longer time scales. This requires new approaches to capture how information flows between the insects. Here, Valentini et al. used a scientific methodology known as information theory to study tandem running in one species of ants and two species of termites. Information theory provides a framework to quantify how information is shared, processed and stored. The flow of information between individuals was measured separately for different aspects of tandem running. At small time scales, ant and termite behavior appeared identical, but over longer periods, it was possible to distinguish between the two types of insects. In termites, only one individual in a pair sent information to the other to instruct the second termite where to go. By contrast, in ants, both members of the tandem communicated with each other in a way that was consistent with how humans acknowledge information they receive from other individuals. The approach used by Valentini et al. will be useful to researchers who study how complex and often cryptic social interactions develop over extended periods in social animals. This framework could also be applied in other systems such as groups of cells, or economic networks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32730203
doi: 10.7554/eLife.55395
pii: 55395
pmc: PMC7392607
doi:
pii:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.9786260']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : PHY-1505048
Pays : International
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : Overseas Research Fellowship
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2020, Valentini et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
GV, NM, SP, TP, SW No competing interests declared
Références
J Comput Neurosci. 2011 Feb;30(1):45-67
pubmed: 20706781
J Exp Biol. 2010 May;213(Pt 10):1697-708
pubmed: 20435821
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Dec 12;5(12):181132
pubmed: 30662732
Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Jul 10;85(2):461-4
pubmed: 10991308
Chaos. 2016 Aug;26(8):083113
pubmed: 27586609
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Feb;77(2 Pt 2):026110
pubmed: 18352093
Curr Biol. 2008 Sep 9;18(17):1300-7
pubmed: 18760606
Science. 1974 Dec 13;186(4168):1046-7
pubmed: 4469698
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 12;8(1):657
pubmed: 29330523
J Chem Ecol. 2007 Oct;33(10):1960-77
pubmed: 17885791
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Jan 13;3(1):150534
pubmed: 26909181
J Exp Biol. 2018 Aug 24;221(Pt 16):
pubmed: 29954834
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jun 13;285(1880):
pubmed: 29875303
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jan 18;4(1):160476
pubmed: 28280548
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Sep;23(9):486-93
pubmed: 18657877
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(8):e1002670
pubmed: 22927811
Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Apr 18;100(15):158101
pubmed: 18518155
Annu Rev Entomol. 2009;54:379-403
pubmed: 18793101
Nature. 2006 Jan 12;439(7073):153
pubmed: 16407943
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Sep;3(9):913-921
pubmed: 31235859
Curr Biol. 2013 Nov 4;23(21):R967-9
pubmed: 24200327
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 5;367(1597):1802-10
pubmed: 22641819
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 19;5:16614
pubmed: 26583485
Sci Adv. 2019 Jun 19;5(6):eaau6108
pubmed: 31223644
Phys Rev E. 2016 Apr;93:042411
pubmed: 27176333
Curr Biol. 2007 Sep 4;17(17):1520-6
pubmed: 17803934
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
Anim Behav. 1999 Feb;57(2):409-419
pubmed: 10049481