Regulations and practices of structured doctoral education in the life sciences in Germany.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
18
06
2019
accepted:
05
05
2020
entrez:
31
7
2020
pubmed:
31
7
2020
medline:
9
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Structured doctoral education is increasingly preferred compared to the individual model. Several science policy organisations give recommendations on how to structure doctoral education. However, there is little research on to what extent these recommendations find their way into practice. In our study, we first compared European and German recommendations on doctoral education with, second, the institutional regulations of structured doctoral programmes (N = 98) in the life sciences at twelve different German universities. Additionally, we third asked doctoral graduates (N = 1796) of these structured doctoral programmes and graduates of individual doctoral studies about their experience in doctoral education. Fourth, we contrasted the regulations of structured doctoral programmes with the reported experiences of their graduates. We found significant deviations of the reported practices of graduates from the regulations of their organisations, regarding the student admission, supervision and curricular activities of doctoral candidates. The efficacy of structured versus traditional doctoral education should be examined based on reported practice rather than on the respective written regulations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32730264
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233415
pii: PONE-D-19-17204
pmc: PMC7392230
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.12562223', '10.6084/m9.figshare.12562220']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0233415Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011 Apr;136(17):876-81
pubmed: 21523637