Genetic analysis of disease resilience in wean-to-finish pigs from a natural disease challenge model.
disease resilience
genetic parameters
natural disease challenge
pigs
Journal
Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2020
01 Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
03
04
2020
accepted:
23
07
2020
pubmed:
31
7
2020
medline:
1
12
2020
entrez:
31
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective was to estimate the genetic parameters of performance and resilience of growing pigs under disease. Data were from 3,139 Yorkshire × Landrace wean-to-finish pigs that were exposed to a natural polymicrobial disease challenge that was established by entering naturally infected animals into a nursery barn, targeting various viral and bacterial diseases. The challenge was maintained by entering batches of 60 or 75 healthy nursery pigs every 3 wk in a continuous flow system. Traits analyzed included average daily gain (ADG), feed intake (ADFI) and duration (ADFD); feed conversion ratio (FCR); residual feed intake (RFI); mortality (MOR); number of health treatments (TRT); health scores (HScore); carcass weight (CWT), back fat (CBF) and loin depth (CLD); dressing percentage (DRS); lean yield (LYLD); day-to-day variation in feed intake and duration (VARFI and VARDUR); and the proportion of off-feed days (OFFFI and OFFDUR). Analyses were performed by mixed linear models with genomic relationships. The resilience traits, such as TRT, MOR, and HScore, were lowly heritable (up to 0.15) but had high genetic correlations with each other. Performance traits, such as ADG, ADFI, ADFD, FCR, RFI, and carcass traits, were moderate to highly heritable (0.17 to 0.49). Heritabilities of resilience indicator traits such as OFF and VAR had low to moderate heritabilities (0.08 to 0.23) but were higher when based on duration vs. amount. ADFI had a low genetic correlation with ADFD (0.13). ADG in the challenge nursery had stronger negative genetic correlations with both TRT and MOR than ADG in the finisher (-0.37 to -0.74 vs. -0.15 to -0.56). ADFI and FCR had moderate negative (-0.21 to -0.39) and positive (0.34 to 0.49) genetic correlations, respectively, with TRT and MOR. ADFD and RFI had very low genetic correlations with TRT and MOR. CWT and DRS were moderately negatively correlated with TRT and MOR (-0.33 to -0.59). Resilience indicator traits based on feed intake or duration had moderate to high positive genetic correlations with TRT (0.18 to 0.81) and MOR (0.33 to 0.87). In conclusion, performance and resilience traits under a polymicrobial disease challenge are heritable and can be changed by selection. Phenotypes extracted from feed intake patterns can be used as genetic indicator traits for disease resilience. Most promising is day-to-day variation in intake duration, which had a sizeable heritability (0.23) and favorable genetic correlations with MOR (0.79) and treatment rate (0.20).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32730570
pii: 5879004
doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa244
pmc: PMC7531181
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
J Anim Sci. 2017 Aug;95(8):3346-3358
pubmed: 28805915
Genetics. 1949 Jul;34(4):395-411
pubmed: 17247323
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Oct;92(10):4971-7
pubmed: 19762814
J Anim Sci. 2013 Sep;91(9):4069-79
pubmed: 23825329
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Feb;103(2):1667-1684
pubmed: 31759590
J Anim Sci. 2016 Aug;94(8):3185-3197
pubmed: 27695791
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Dec 30;41:54
pubmed: 20042096
Anim Genet. 2014 Feb;45(1):48-58
pubmed: 23914972
J Anim Sci. 1996 Jul;74(7):1620-8
pubmed: 8818807
J Anim Sci. 2008 Dec;86(12):3330-7
pubmed: 18708608
Animal. 2007 Mar;1(3):317-23
pubmed: 22444329
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Nov;91(11):4414-23
pubmed: 18946147
J Anim Sci. 2017 Aug;95(8):3370-3380
pubmed: 28805927
Int J Parasitol. 1996 Aug-Sep;26(8-9):857-68
pubmed: 8923135
J Dairy Sci. 2007 Jul;90(7):3220-33
pubmed: 17582105
Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Mar 04;46:18
pubmed: 24592976
J Anim Sci. 2008 Feb;86(2):287-98
pubmed: 17998435
J Dairy Sci. 1993 Sep;76(9):2758-64
pubmed: 8227679
J Anim Sci. 2007 Apr;85(4):901-8
pubmed: 17178815
Front Genet. 2012 Dec 14;3:265
pubmed: 23412990
J Anim Sci. 2005 May;83(5):969-82
pubmed: 15827241
J Anim Sci. 2017 Aug;95(8):3467-3478
pubmed: 28805893
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Aug;88(8):2843-9
pubmed: 16027199
J Dairy Sci. 1991 Dec;74(12):4344-9
pubmed: 1787203
J Anim Sci. 1999 Aug;77(8):1994-2002
pubmed: 10461973
J Anim Sci. 2012 Jun;90(6):1733-46
pubmed: 22205662
PLoS One. 2010 Jan 28;5(1):e8940
pubmed: 20126627
Front Genet. 2019 Jan 08;9:660
pubmed: 30671080
Int J Parasitol. 1987 Oct;17(7):1355-63
pubmed: 3429127