Vigabatrin add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.


Journal

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 07 2020
Historique:
entrez: 31 7 2020
pubmed: 31 7 2020
medline: 20 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in 2008 and updated in 2013. Epilepsy is a common neurological condition which affects up to 1% of the population. Approximately 30% of people with epilepsy do not respond to treatment with currently available drugs. The majority of these people have focal epilepsy. Vigabatrin is an antiepileptic drug licensed for use in drug-resistant epilepsy. To assess the efficacy and tolerability of vigabatrin as an add-on therapy for people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. For the latest update of this review, we searched the following databases on 1 November 2018: Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), MEDLINE (Ovid 1946 to 31 October 2018), ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. The Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) are both included in the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web). We checked reference lists of retrieved studies for additional reports of relevant studies and contacted Hoechst Marion Roussel (manufacturers of vigabatrin) in 2000. We included randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fully published trials of vigabatrin in people of any age with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Two review authors assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data using the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Primary analysis was by intention-to-treat (ITT). We evaluated: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, treatment withdrawal, adverse effects, dose-response analysis, cognitive outcomes and quality of life. We presented results as risk ratios (RR) with 95% or 99% confidence intervals (CI). We identified 11 trials that included 756 participants (age range: 10 to 64 years). The trials tested vigabatrin doses between 1 g/day and 6 g/day. All 11 trials displayed a risk of bias across at least three risk of bias domains. Predominantly, the risk of bias was associated with: allocation concealment (selection bias), blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) and incomplete outcome data (attrition bias). Participants treated with vigabatrin may be two to three times more likely to obtain a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency compared with those treated with placebo (RR 2.60, 95% CI 1.87 to 3.63; 4 studies; low-certainty evidence). Those treated with vigabatrin may also be three times more likely to have treatment withdrawn although we are uncertain (RR 2.86, 95% CI 1.25 to 6.55; 4 studies; very low-certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, participants given vigabatrin were more likely to experience adverse effects: dizziness/light-headedness (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.87; 9 studies; low-certainty evidence), fatigue (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.51; 9 studies; low-certainty evidence), drowsiness (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.44; 8 studies) and depression (RR 3.28, 95% CI 1.30 to 8.27; 6 studies). Although the incidence rates were higher among participants receiving vigabatrin compared to those receiving placebo, the effect was not significant for the following adverse effects: ataxia (RR 2.76, 95% CI 0.96 to 7.94; 7 studies; very low-certainty evidence), nausea (RR 3.57, 95% CI 0.63 to 20.30; 4 studies), abnormal vision (RR 1.64, 95% CI 0.67 to 4.02; 5 studies; very low-certainty evidence), headache (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.92; 9 studies), diplopia (RR 1.76, 99% CI 0.94 to 3.30) and nystagmus (RR 1.53, 99% CI 0.62 to 3.76; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). Vigabatrin had little to no effect on cognitive outcomes or quality of life. Vigabatrin may significantly reduce seizure frequency in people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. The results largely apply to adults and should not be extrapolated to children under 10 years old. Short-term follow-up of participants showed that some adverse effects were associated with its use. Analysis of longer-term observational studies elsewhere, however, has demonstrated that vigabatrin use can lead to the development of visual field defects.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in 2008 and updated in 2013. Epilepsy is a common neurological condition which affects up to 1% of the population. Approximately 30% of people with epilepsy do not respond to treatment with currently available drugs. The majority of these people have focal epilepsy. Vigabatrin is an antiepileptic drug licensed for use in drug-resistant epilepsy.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy and tolerability of vigabatrin as an add-on therapy for people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
SEARCH METHODS
For the latest update of this review, we searched the following databases on 1 November 2018: Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), MEDLINE (Ovid 1946 to 31 October 2018), ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. The Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) are both included in the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web). We checked reference lists of retrieved studies for additional reports of relevant studies and contacted Hoechst Marion Roussel (manufacturers of vigabatrin) in 2000.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fully published trials of vigabatrin in people of any age with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data using the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Primary analysis was by intention-to-treat (ITT). We evaluated: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, treatment withdrawal, adverse effects, dose-response analysis, cognitive outcomes and quality of life. We presented results as risk ratios (RR) with 95% or 99% confidence intervals (CI).
MAIN RESULTS
We identified 11 trials that included 756 participants (age range: 10 to 64 years). The trials tested vigabatrin doses between 1 g/day and 6 g/day. All 11 trials displayed a risk of bias across at least three risk of bias domains. Predominantly, the risk of bias was associated with: allocation concealment (selection bias), blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) and incomplete outcome data (attrition bias). Participants treated with vigabatrin may be two to three times more likely to obtain a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency compared with those treated with placebo (RR 2.60, 95% CI 1.87 to 3.63; 4 studies; low-certainty evidence). Those treated with vigabatrin may also be three times more likely to have treatment withdrawn although we are uncertain (RR 2.86, 95% CI 1.25 to 6.55; 4 studies; very low-certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, participants given vigabatrin were more likely to experience adverse effects: dizziness/light-headedness (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.87; 9 studies; low-certainty evidence), fatigue (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.51; 9 studies; low-certainty evidence), drowsiness (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.44; 8 studies) and depression (RR 3.28, 95% CI 1.30 to 8.27; 6 studies). Although the incidence rates were higher among participants receiving vigabatrin compared to those receiving placebo, the effect was not significant for the following adverse effects: ataxia (RR 2.76, 95% CI 0.96 to 7.94; 7 studies; very low-certainty evidence), nausea (RR 3.57, 95% CI 0.63 to 20.30; 4 studies), abnormal vision (RR 1.64, 95% CI 0.67 to 4.02; 5 studies; very low-certainty evidence), headache (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.92; 9 studies), diplopia (RR 1.76, 99% CI 0.94 to 3.30) and nystagmus (RR 1.53, 99% CI 0.62 to 3.76; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). Vigabatrin had little to no effect on cognitive outcomes or quality of life.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Vigabatrin may significantly reduce seizure frequency in people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. The results largely apply to adults and should not be extrapolated to children under 10 years old. Short-term follow-up of participants showed that some adverse effects were associated with its use. Analysis of longer-term observational studies elsewhere, however, has demonstrated that vigabatrin use can lead to the development of visual field defects.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32730657
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007302.pub3
pmc: PMC8211760
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anticonvulsants 0
Vigabatrin GR120KRT6K

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

CD007302

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 16/114/26
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : UpdateOf

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Références

Epilepsia. 1995 Feb;36(2):164-73
pubmed: 7821274
Epilepsia. 1986 Nov-Dec;27(6):717-23
pubmed: 3536469
Epilepsia. 1999 Mar;40(3):311-5
pubmed: 10080511
Paediatr Drugs. 2008;10(4):217-54
pubmed: 18590343
Epilepsia. 1998 Oct;39(10):1088-97
pubmed: 9776330
Epilepsy Res. 1996 Nov;25(3):209-15
pubmed: 8956918
J Child Neurol. 2005 Dec;20 Suppl 1:S1-56; quiz S59-60
pubmed: 16615562
Seizure. 2000 Apr;9(3):224-32
pubmed: 10777431
Seizure. 1996 Dec;5(4):259-65
pubmed: 8952010
Lancet. 1984 Jan 28;1(8370):189-90
pubmed: 6141335
BMJ. 1997 Jan 18;314(7075):180-1
pubmed: 9022432
Neurology. 1993 Dec;43(12):2501-7
pubmed: 8255447
Neurology. 1996 Jan;46(1):54-61
pubmed: 8559421
Epilepsia. 2017 Apr;58(4):522-530
pubmed: 28276060
Neurology. 2017 Jan 17;88(3):296-303
pubmed: 27986877
Neurology. 1984 Feb;34(2):182-6
pubmed: 6538006
Ann Neurol. 1985 Mar;17(3):262-6
pubmed: 3922282
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;73(3):327-9
pubmed: 12185173
Drugs. 1991 Jun;41(6):889-926
pubmed: 1715266
Epilepsia. 2007 Jul;48(7):1318-27
pubmed: 17635558
BMJ. 1996 Nov 9;313(7066):1169-74
pubmed: 8916746
Epilepsia. 1991 Jul-Aug;32(4):530-8
pubmed: 1868811
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 08;(4):CD001770
pubmed: 18843624
Acta Neurol Scand. 1996 Jul;94(1):12-8
pubmed: 8874587
Arch Neurol. 1987 Sep;44(9):907-10
pubmed: 2887152
Epilepsia. 2010 Dec;51(12):2423-31
pubmed: 21070215
Epilepsia. 1993 Sep-Oct;34(5):937-43
pubmed: 8404750
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD007302
pubmed: 18646179
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990 Dec;53(12):1051-5
pubmed: 2292696
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Sep;57(9):1057-63
pubmed: 8089668
Lancet. 1995 Jul 15;346(8968):140-4
pubmed: 7603228
Epilepsia. 1986 Mar-Apr;27(2):115-20
pubmed: 3514204
Epilepsia. 1999 Jan;40(1):74-82
pubmed: 9924905
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Dec;56(12):1271-5
pubmed: 8270925
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD007302
pubmed: 23440814

Auteurs

Rebecca Bresnahan (R)

Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Myrsini Gianatsi (M)

Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Melissa J Maguire (MJ)

Department of Neurology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.

Catrin Tudur Smith (C)

Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Anthony G Marson (AG)

Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH