Cryotherapy With Mobilization Versus Cryotherapy With Mobilization Reinforced With Home Stretching Exercises in Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Trial.
Cryotherapy
Neck Pain
Range of Motion, Articular
Rehabilitation
Journal
Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics
ISSN: 1532-6586
Titre abrégé: J Manipulative Physiol Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7807107
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
07
03
2018
revised:
24
07
2018
accepted:
02
11
2018
pubmed:
1
8
2020
medline:
30
3
2021
entrez:
1
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of cryotherapy with mobilization (CM) vs cryotherapy with mobilization reinforced with home stretching exercises (CMS) on pain and disability. A randomized clinical trial with 2-arm parallel design, concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intention to-treat analysis. Sixty participants were in 2 groups. Group 1 included cryotherapy with mobilization twice per week for 5 weeks. Group 2 included cryotherapy with mobilization plus home stretching exercises 5 times per week for 5 weeks. The evaluations were at baseline and 2 days posttreatment for the numeric pain rating scale, neck disability index, patient-specific functional scale, and global rating of change. The CM and CMS decreased neck pain and disability (P = .000). The statistical significance between the groups' differences favored the CM in the numeric pain rating scale, patient-specific functional scale, global rating of change (P = .000), and neck disability index (P = .004). Cryotherapy with mobilization for subjects in this study was more effective in decreasing disability and neck pain than CMS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32731960
pii: S0161-4754(20)30005-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.11.030
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
197-205Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.