Plasma polymerized nanoparticles effectively deliver dual siRNA and drug therapy in vivo.
Animals
Antineoplastic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Breast Neoplasms
/ pathology
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug Delivery Systems
Female
Mice
Nanoparticles
Paclitaxel
/ administration & dosage
Plasma
Polymerization
RNA, Small Interfering
/ administration & dosage
Tumor Microenvironment
/ drug effects
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
/ metabolism
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 07 2020
30 07 2020
Historique:
received:
17
12
2019
accepted:
15
07
2020
entrez:
1
8
2020
pubmed:
1
8
2020
medline:
10
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Multifunctional nanocarriers (MNCs) promise to improve therapeutic outcomes by combining multiple classes of molecules into a single nanostructure, enhancing active targeting of therapeutic agents and facilitating new combination therapies. However, nanocarrier platforms currently approved for clinical use can still only carry a single therapeutic agent. The complexity and escalating costs associated with the synthesis of more complex MNCs have been major technological roadblocks in the pathway for clinical translation. Here, we show that plasma polymerized nanoparticles (PPNs), synthesised in reactive gas discharges, can bind and effectively deliver multiple therapeutic cargo in a facile and cost-effective process compatible with up scaled commercial production. Delivery of siRNA against vascular endothelial growth factor (siVEGF) at extremely low concentrations (0.04 nM), significantly reduced VEGF expression in hard-to-transfect cells when compared with commercial platforms carrying higher siRNA doses (6.25 nM). PPNs carrying a combination of siVEGF and standard of care Paclitaxel (PPN-Dual) at reduced doses (< 100 µg/kg) synergistically modulated the microenvironment of orthotopic breast tumors in mice, and significantly reduced tumor growth. We propose PPNs as a new nanomaterial for delivery of therapeutics, which can be easily functionalised in any laboratory setting without the need for additional wet-chemistry and purification steps.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32732927
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69591-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-69591-x
pmc: PMC7393381
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
RNA, Small Interfering
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12836Références
Sanna, V., Pala, N. & Sechi, M. Targeted therapy using nanotechnology: focus on cancer. Int. J. Nanomed. 9, 467–483 (2014).
Shi, J., Kantoff, P. W., Wooster, R. & Farokhzad, O. C. Cancer nanomedicine: Progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 20–37 (2017).
pubmed: 27834398
doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.108
Blanco, E., Shen, H. & Ferrari, M. Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 941–951 (2015).
pubmed: 26348965
pmcid: 4978509
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3330
Shi, J., Kantoff, P. W., Wooster, R. & Farokhzad, O. C. Cancer nanomedicine: Progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 20 (2016).
pubmed: 27834398
pmcid: 5575742
doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.108
Wilhelm, S. et al. Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16014 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.14
Maeda, H. Toward a full understanding of the EPR effect in primary and metastatic tumors as well as issues related to its heterogeneity. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 91, 3–6 (2015).
pubmed: 25579058
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.01.002
Bertrand, N., Wu, J., Xu, X., Kamaly, N. & Farokhzad, O. C. Cancer nanotechnology: The impact of passive and active targeting in the era of modern cancer biology. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 66, 2–25 (2014).
pubmed: 24270007
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.11.009
Matsumura, Y. & Maeda, H. A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: Mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent Smancs. Can. Res. 46, 6387 (1986).
Shi, J., Votruba, A. R., Farokhzad, O. C. & Langer, R. Nanotechnology in drug delivery and tissue engineering: From discovery to applications. Nano Lett. 10, 3223–3230 (2010).
pubmed: 20726522
pmcid: 2935937
doi: 10.1021/nl102184c
Ferrari, M. Cancer nanotechnology: Opportunities and challenges. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 161–171 (2005).
pubmed: 15738981
doi: 10.1038/nrc1566
Peer, D. et al. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 751–760 (2007).
pubmed: 18654426
doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.387
Wang, Y., Gao, S., Ye, W.-H., Yoon, H. S. & Yang, Y.-Y. Co-delivery of drugs and DNA from cationic core–shell nanoparticles self-assembled from a biodegradable copolymer. Nat. Mater. 5, 791–796 (2006).
pubmed: 16998471
doi: 10.1038/nmat1737
Ediriwickrema, A., Zhou, J., Deng, Y. & Saltzman, W. M. Multi-layered nanoparticles for combination gene and drug delivery to tumors. Biomaterials 35, 9343–9354 (2014).
pubmed: 25112935
pmcid: 4155034
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.043
Tang, S. et al. Inhibition of metastasis and growth of breast cancer by pH-sensitive poly (β-amino ester) nanoparticles co-delivering two siRNA and paclitaxel. Biomaterials 48, 1–15 (2015).
pubmed: 25701027
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.049
Xu, Z. et al. The characteristics and performance of a multifunctional nanoassembly system for the co-delivery of docetaxel and iSur-pDNA in a mouse hepatocellular carcinoma model. Biomaterials 31, 916–922 (2010).
pubmed: 19846217
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.103
Anselmo, A. C. & Mitragotri, S. Nanoparticles in the clinic. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 1, 10–29 (2016).
pubmed: 29313004
pmcid: 5689513
doi: 10.1002/btm2.10003
Kumari, P., Ghosh, B. & Biswas, S. Nanocarriers for cancer-targeted drug delivery. J. Drug Target. 24, 179–191 (2016).
pubmed: 26061298
doi: 10.3109/1061186X.2015.1051049
Cheng, Z., Zaki, A.A., Hui, J.Z., Muzykantov, V.R. & Tsourkas, A. Multifunctional nanoparticles: Cost versus benefit of adding targeting and imaging capabilities. Science (New York, N.Y.) 338, 903–910 (2012).
Rosenblum, D., Joshi, N., Tao, W., Karp, J. M. & Peer, D. Progress and challenges towards targeted delivery of cancer therapeutics. Nat. Commun. 9, 1410 (2018).
pubmed: 29650952
pmcid: 5897557
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03705-y
Ashley, C. E. et al. The targeted delivery of multicomponent cargos to cancer cells by nanoporous particle-supported lipid bilayers. Nat. Mater. 10, 389–397 (2011).
pubmed: 21499315
pmcid: 3287066
doi: 10.1038/nmat2992
Yu, M. K., Park, J. & Jon, S. Targeting strategies for multifunctional nanoparticles in cancer imaging and therapy. Theranostics 2, 3–44 (2012).
pubmed: 22272217
pmcid: 3263514
doi: 10.7150/thno.3463
Veiseh, O. et al. Specific targeting of brain tumors with an optical/magnetic resonance imaging nanoprobe across the blood-brain barrier. Can. Res. 69, 6200–6207 (2009).
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1157
Veiseh, O., Gunn, J. W. & Zhang, M. Design and fabrication of magnetic nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery and imaging. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 62, 284–304 (2010).
pubmed: 19909778
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.002
Zhang, J. & Misra, R. D. K. Magnetic drug-targeting carrier encapsulated with thermosensitive smart polymer: Core–shell nanoparticle carrier and drug release response. Acta Biomater. 3, 838–850 (2007).
pubmed: 17638599
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.05.011
Hua, S. & Wu, S. Y. Editorial: Advances and challenges in nanomedicine. Front. Pharmacol. 9, 1397–1397 (2018).
pubmed: 30555328
pmcid: 6281879
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01397
Hua, S., de Matos, M. B. C., Metselaar, J. M. & Storm, G. Current trends and challenges in the clinical translation of nanoparticulate nanomedicines: Pathways for translational development and commercialization. Front. Pharmacol. 9, 790–790 (2018).
pubmed: 30065653
pmcid: 6056679
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00790
Santos, M. et al. Plasma synthesis of carbon-based nanocarriers for linker-free immobilization of bioactive cargo. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 1, 580–594 (2018).
doi: 10.1021/acsanm.7b00086
Wise, S. G., Waterhouse, A., Kondyurin, A., Bilek, M. M. & Weiss, A. S. Plasma-based biofunctionalization of vascular implants. Nanomedicine (Lond) 7, 1907–1916 (2012).
doi: 10.2217/nnm.12.161
Santos, M., Bilek, M. M. M. & Wise, S. G. Plasma-synthesised carbon-based coatings for cardiovascular applications. Biosurf. Biotribiol 1, 146–160 (2015).
Vanags, L. Z. et al. Plasma activated coating immobilizes apolipoprotein A-I to stainless steel surfaces in its bioactive form and enhances biocompatibility. Nanomedicine 13, 2141–2150 (2017).
pubmed: 28668625
doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2017.06.012
Winter, J. Dust in fusion devices—A multi-faceted problem connecting high- and low-temperature plasma physics. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 46, B583–B592 (2004).
doi: 10.1088/0741-3335/46/12B/047
Ishihara, O. Complex plasma: Dusts in plasma. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 40, R121–R147 (2007).
doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/40/8/R01
Santos, M. et al. Substrate geometry modulates self-assembly and collection of plasma polymerized nanoparticles. Commun. Phys. 2, 52 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s42005-019-0153-5
Santos, M. et al. Mechanically robust plasma-activated interfaces optimized for vascular stent applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 8, 9635–9650 (2016).
pubmed: 27015083
doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b01279
Wang, Z., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Yu, X. & Wu, Z. Influence of surface functional groups on deposition and release of TiO
pubmed: 28602072
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00956
Yuan, L., Chen, L., Chen, X., Liu, R. & Ge, G. In situ measurement of surface functional groups on silica nanoparticles using solvent relaxation nuclear magnetic resonance. Langmuir 33, 8724–8729 (2017).
pubmed: 28467712
doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00923
Clavier, A., Seijo, M., Carnal, F. & Stoll, S. Surface charging behavior of nanoparticles by considering site distribution and density, dielectric constant and pH changes—A Monte Carlo approach. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 4346–4353 (2015).
pubmed: 25579770
doi: 10.1039/C4CP04733H
Kang, L., Gao, Z., Huang, W., Jin, M. & Wang, Q. Nanocarrier-mediated co-delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs and gene agents for cancer treatment. Acta Pharmaceut. Sin. B 5, 169–175 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2015.03.001
Feng, Q. et al. Synergistic inhibition of breast cancer by co-delivery of VEGF siRNA and paclitaxel via vapreotide-modified core–shell nanoparticles. Biomaterials 35, 5028–5038 (2014).
pubmed: 24680191
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.012
Iijima, M. & Kamiya, H. Surface modification of silicon carbide nanoparticles by azo radical initiators. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 11786–11790 (2008).
doi: 10.1021/jp709608p
Hirsh, S. L. et al. The Vroman effect: Competitive protein exchange with dynamic multilayer protein aggregates. Colloids Surf. B 103, 395–404 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.10.039
Zatsepin, T. S., Kotelevtsev, Y. V. & Koteliansky, V. Lipid nanoparticles for targeted siRNA delivery—Going from bench to bedside. Int. J. Nanomed. 11, 3077–3086 (2016).
doi: 10.2147/IJN.S106625
Xue, H. Y., Guo, P., Wen, W.-C. & Wong, H. L. Lipid-based nanocarriers for RNA delivery. Curr. Pharm. Des. 21, 3140–3147 (2015).
pubmed: 26027572
pmcid: 4618487
doi: 10.2174/1381612821666150531164540
Schroeder, A., Levins, C. G., Cortez, C., Langer, R. & Anderson, D. G. Lipid-based nanotherapeutics for siRNA delivery. J. Intern. Med. 267, 9–21 (2010).
pubmed: 20059641
pmcid: 5308083
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02189.x
Khatri, N., Baradia, D., Vhora, I., Rathi, M. & Misra, A. Development and characterization of siRNA lipoplexes: Effect of different lipids, in vitro evaluation in cancerous cell lines and in vivo toxicity study. AAPS PharmSciTech. 15, 1630–1643 (2014).
pubmed: 25145330
pmcid: 4245436
doi: 10.1208/s12249-014-0193-9
Ma, D. Enhancing endosomal escape for nanoparticle mediated siRNA delivery. Nanoscale 6, 6415–6425 (2014).
pubmed: 24837409
doi: 10.1039/c4nr00018h
Dominska, M. & Dykxhoorn, D. M. Breaking down the barriers: siRNA delivery and endosome escape. J. Cell Sci. 123, 1183–1189 (2010).
pubmed: 20356929
doi: 10.1242/jcs.066399
Sahay, G. et al. Efficiency of siRNA delivery by lipid nanoparticles is limited by endocytic recycling. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 653 (2013).
pubmed: 23792629
pmcid: 3814166
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2614
Guo, S. et al. Enhanced gene delivery and siRNA silencing by gold nanoparticles coated with charge-reversal polyelectrolyte. ACS Nano 4, 5505–5511 (2010).
pubmed: 20707386
pmcid: 3044603
doi: 10.1021/nn101638u
ABruce Alberts, A.J., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., Walter, P. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th edn. (Garland Science, New York, 2002). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21054/ .
Xia, L. et al. Endocytosed nanoparticles hold endosomes and stimulate binucleated cells formation. Particle Fibre Toxicol. 13, 63 (2016).
doi: 10.1186/s12989-016-0173-1
Shukla, R.S., Jain, A., Zhao, Z. & Cheng, K. Intracellular trafficking and exocytosis of a multi-component siRNA nanocomplex. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 12, 1323–1334 (2016).
Wojnilowicz, M., Glab, A., Bertucci, A., Caruso, F. & Cavalieri, F. Super-resolution imaging of proton sponge-triggered rupture of endosomes and cytosolic release of small interfering RNA. ACS Nano 13, 187–202 (2019).
pubmed: 30566836
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b05151
Rehman, Z. U., Hoekstra, D. & Zuhorn, I. S. Mechanism of polyplex- and lipoplex-mediated delivery of nucleic acids: Real-time visualization of transient membrane destabilization without endosomal lysis. ACS Nano 7, 3767–3777 (2013).
doi: 10.1021/nn3049494
Smith, S. A., Selby, L. I., Johnston, A. P. R. & Such, G. K. The endosomal escape of nanoparticles: Toward more efficient cellular delivery. Bioconjug. Chem. 30, 263–272 (2019).
pubmed: 30452233
doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00732
Selby, L.I., Cortez-Jugo, C.M., Such, G.K. & Johnston, A.P.R. Nanoescapology: progress toward understanding the endosomal escape of polymeric nanoparticles. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 9 (2017).
Hunt, M. A., Currie, M. J., Robinson, B. A. & Dachs, G. U. Optimizing transfection of primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells using commercially available chemical transfection reagents. J. Biomol. Tech. 21, 66–72 (2010).
pubmed: 20592869
pmcid: 2884313
Avci-Adali, M. et al. Optimized conditions for successful transfection of human endothelial cells with in vitro synthesized and modified mRNA for induction of protein expression. J. Biol. Eng. 8, 8 (2014).
pubmed: 24581116
pmcid: 3975882
doi: 10.1186/1754-1611-8-8
Chernousova, S. & Epple, M. Live-cell imaging to compare the transfection and gene silencing efficiency of calcium phosphate nanoparticles and a liposomal transfection agent. Gene Ther. 24, 282–289 (2017).
pubmed: 28218744
pmcid: 5442419
doi: 10.1038/gt.2017.13
Mok, H. & Park, T. G. Self-crosslinked and reducible fusogenic peptides for intracellular delivery of siRNA. Biopolymers 89, 881–888 (2008).
pubmed: 18521895
doi: 10.1002/bip.21032
Sieveking, D. P., Buckle, A., Celermajer, D. S. & Ng, M. K. C. Strikingly different angiogenic properties of endothelial progenitor cell subpopulations: Insights from a novel human angiogenesis assay. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 51, 660–668 (2008).
pubmed: 18261686
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.059
Bayat Mokhtari, R. et al. Combination therapy in combating cancer. Oncotarget 8, 38022–38043 (2017).
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16723
pubmed: 28410237
Kim, H. S., Oh, J. M., Jin, D. H., Yang, K. H. & Moon, E. Y. Paclitaxel induces vascular endothelial growth factor expression through reactive oxygen species production. Pharmacology 81, 317–324 (2008).
pubmed: 18322419
doi: 10.1159/000119756
Abal, M., Andreu, J. M. & Barasoain, I. Taxanes: Microtubule and centrosome targets, and cell cycle dependent mechanisms of action. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 3, 193–203 (2003).
pubmed: 12769688
doi: 10.2174/1568009033481967
Fung, A. S., Lee, C., Yu, M. & Tannock, I. F. The effect of chemotherapeutic agents on tumor vasculature in subcutaneous and orthotopic human tumor xenografts. BMC Cancer 15, 112 (2015).
pubmed: 25884767
pmcid: 4363401
doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1091-6
Zhang, Y. et al. Establishment of a murine breast tumor model by subcutaneous or orthotopic implantation. Oncol. Lett. 15, 6233–6240 (2018).
pubmed: 29616105
pmcid: 5876452
Niu, G. & Chen, X. Vascular endothelial growth factor as an anti-angiogenic target for cancer therapy. Curr. Drug Targets 11, 1000–1017 (2010).
pubmed: 20426765
pmcid: 3617502
doi: 10.2174/138945010791591395
Leandro-García, L. J. et al. Regulatory polymorphisms in β-tubulin IIa are associated with paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 4441–4448 (2012).
pubmed: 22718863
pmcid: 3664665
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1221
Wolf, B. B., Schuler, M., Echeverri, F. & Green, D. R. Caspase-3 is the primary activator of apoptotic DNA fragmentation via DNA fragmentation factor-45/inhibitor of caspase-activated DNase inactivation. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 30651–30656 (1999).
pubmed: 10521451
doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.43.30651
Sahoo, S. & Lester, S. C. Pathology of breast carcinomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: An overview with recommendations on specimen processing and reporting. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 133, 633–642 (2009).
pubmed: 19391665
doi: 10.5858/133.4.633
Aktepe, F., Kapucuoğlu, N. & Pak, I. The effects of chemotherapy on breast cancer tissue in locally advanced breast cancer. Histopathology 29, 63–67 (1996).
pubmed: 8818696
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1996.d01-485.x
Vasudevan, D., Jayalakshmy, P. S., Kumar, S. & Mathew, S. Assessment of pathological response of breast carcinoma in modified radical mastectomy specimens after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Int. J. Breast Cancer 2015, 536145–536145 (2015).
pubmed: 26697228
pmcid: 4677209
doi: 10.1155/2015/536145