Uptake of Biosimilar Infliximab in the UK, France, Japan, and Korea: Budget Savings or Market Expansion Across Countries?

Korea biosimilar cross national comparisons infliximab market dynamics market penetration

Journal

Frontiers in pharmacology
ISSN: 1663-9812
Titre abrégé: Front Pharmacol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548923

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 25 01 2020
accepted: 15 06 2020
entrez: 1 8 2020
pubmed: 1 8 2020
medline: 1 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To compare the market dynamics of biosimilar infliximab among four Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries (UK, France, Japan, and Korea) where supply-side and demand-side policies varied greatly, given high and growing expenditure on biological medicines to treat immunological diseases across countries. A quarterly dataset covering October 2012 to March 2018 was constructed from the MIDAS-IQVIA International database. The sales value (in USD) and volume (in standard units) of originator infliximab and biosimilar products and their relative price in each country were compared. With the introduction of biosimilars, the sales value of infliximab increased approximately 2.5 times in Korea, whereas it only slightly increased (1.2 times for France and the UK) or decreased (0.9 for Japan) in other countries. While stable market size dynamics were observed in the other countries, an escalating market size, attributable to the increase in originator infliximab, was observed in Korea. In the UK and France, which have implemented demand-side policies, the sales volume of originator infliximab appreciably decreased after the entry of biosimilar infliximab while that of biosimilars increased; however, in Korea, which has supply-side policies based on price-linking with few demand-side policies, the volume of originator infliximab actually increased by 70% alongside a very limited increase in biosimilar infliximab. The lowest price ratio between biosimilar and originator infliximab was found in Japan, at 68%. In France and Korea, the ex-factory prices of biosimilar infliximab were 99 and 95%, respectively, of the originator infliximab price. In the UK, the ex-factory price of biosimilar infliximab started at 87% of that of originator infliximab and then decreased to 80% as the market matured. However, actual price differences might differ. The uptake of biosimilar infliximab varied greatly, and in contrast to the UK, France, and Japan, the introduction of biosimilar infliximab resulted in market expansion in Korea, which might be explained by a lack of demand-side policies in Korea. Both supply- and demand-side measures are necessary for health authorities to achieve desired savings from the availability of biosimilars.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32733238
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00970
pmc: PMC7363801
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

970

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Kim, Kwon, Godman, Moorkens, Simoens and Bae.

Références

Eur J Health Econ. 2004 Jun;5(2):175-82
pubmed: 15452754
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190665
pubmed: 30874783
BioDrugs. 2019 Jun;33(3):285-297
pubmed: 30945207
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Apr;45(8):1043-1057
pubmed: 28239873
Biologics. 2018 Aug 30;12:87-95
pubmed: 30214149
P T. 2019 Jan;44(2):54-63
pubmed: 30766011
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Feb;43(1):36-42
pubmed: 29116927
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 18;8(11):e023603
pubmed: 30455389
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Mar 28;10:279
pubmed: 30983996
Drugs R D. 2017 Sep;17(3):481-485
pubmed: 28667384
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Apr;93:19-27
pubmed: 29448072
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Apr;32(4):753-61
pubmed: 23569056
Int J Pharm Pract. 2019 Apr;27(2):214-217
pubmed: 30160324
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 14;16:130
pubmed: 27080530
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 28;12(12):e0190147
pubmed: 29284064
Future Oncol. 2019 Apr;15(12):1353-1361
pubmed: 30767568
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;14(8):742-750
pubmed: 25022435
J Crohns Colitis. 2017 Jun 1;11(6):690-696
pubmed: 28130330
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017 Apr 28;5(1):1307315
pubmed: 28740617
Drug Discov Today. 2019 Jan;24(1):293-299
pubmed: 30244082
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017 Jan 30;5(1):1272308
pubmed: 28265349
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Sep-Oct;25(5):1353-62
pubmed: 16966733
J Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(2):020702
pubmed: 31673344
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Dec;18(6):655-666
pubmed: 30014725
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 20;14:469
pubmed: 25331607
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):198-206
pubmed: 23467636
Breast Care (Basel). 2019 Mar;14(1):17-22
pubmed: 31019438
Lancet. 2017 Jun 10;389(10086):2304-2316
pubmed: 28502609
Adv Ther. 2017 May;34(5):1128-1144
pubmed: 28397080
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Feb;15(1):85-93
pubmed: 27587010
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Jun;34(6):609-16
pubmed: 26792791
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2013 Sep;6(8):469-78
pubmed: 24991376

Auteurs

Yujeong Kim (Y)

College of Pharmacy, Ewha Woman's University, Seoul, South Korea.

Hye-Young Kwon (HY)

Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.

Brian Godman (B)

Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Garankuwa, South Africa.

Evelien Moorkens (E)

Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Steven Simoens (S)

Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

SeungJin Bae (S)

College of Pharmacy, Ewha Woman's University, Seoul, South Korea.

Classifications MeSH