Effect of sexed semen on different production and functional traits in German Holsteins.

(C_F), conventional semen × female calves (C_M), conventional semen × male calves (S_F), sexed semen × female calves (S_M), sexed semen × male calves Calf sex Heifer Sexed semen Stillbirth

Journal

Veterinary and animal science
ISSN: 2451-943X
Titre abrégé: Vet Anim Sci
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101694897

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Historique:
received: 25 11 2019
revised: 25 02 2020
accepted: 02 03 2020
entrez: 1 8 2020
pubmed: 1 8 2020
medline: 1 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this study was to analyze possible effects of semen type (conventional vs. female sexed) and calf sex on fertility and production traits. For this purpose, field data of German Holstein heifers in Lower Saxony were evaluated. Sexed semen was mainly used for first insemination. 87.0% female calves were born from sexed semen, while 52.7% female calves were born from conventional semen. Heifers inseminated with sexed semen were on average 43 to 48 days younger at their first calving than heifers inseminated with conventional semen. Calf sex had an influence on the average calving ease and the dystocia rates. Male calves showed higher calving ease scores and caused a higher risk for dystocia than female calves. The semen type had no influence on these characteristics. Within the same calf sex, sexed semen had only minor effects on most traits, except for stillbirth rates: the stillbirth rate for male calves from female sexed semen was 30.6%, which was 2.86 times the stillbirth rate of male calves from conventional semen, possibly due to trisomies. Sexed semen played only a minor role for production traits in first lactations. The extrapolated 305-day milk yield was 200 kg lower for first calf heifers, which were inseminated with sexed semen compared to heifers inseminated with conventional semen. Fat and protein yield were 6 kg to 8 kg lower after use of sexed semen. Animals with female offspring from sexed semen showed higher survival rates than the other groups.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32734111
doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2020.100101
pii: S2451-943X(20)30014-4
pii: 100101
pmc: PMC7386698
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100101

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Références

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012 Oct 23;7:81
pubmed: 23088440
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Aug;87(8):2730-42
pubmed: 15328299
J Anim Sci. 1991 Sep;69(9):3574-89
pubmed: 1938643
Reproduction. 2013 Jan 08;145(1):R15-30
pubmed: 23148085
J Dairy Sci. 2008 May;91(5):1778-85
pubmed: 18420608
J Anim Sci. 2004 Apr;82(4):1029-36
pubmed: 15080324
Cytometry. 1982 Jul;3(1):1-9
pubmed: 6180870
Vet Rec. 1988 Apr 2;122(14):322-4
pubmed: 3164152
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Aug;93(8):3880-90
pubmed: 20655457
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Feb;96(2):854-6
pubmed: 23219125
Anim Reprod Sci. 2003 Dec 15;79(3-4):145-56
pubmed: 14643102
Theriogenology. 1999 Dec;52(8):1375-91
pubmed: 10735083
J Med Genet. 1977 Oct;14(5):313-5
pubmed: 563464
Theriogenology. 2009 Jan 1;71(1):49-58
pubmed: 18996579
Nature. 1959 Jan 31;183(4657):302-3
pubmed: 13632697
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Jun;93(6):2496-507
pubmed: 20494157
Theriogenology. 1999 Dec;52(8):1421-33
pubmed: 10735086
J Reprod Fertil. 1979 Nov;57(2):319-23
pubmed: 513021
Pediatrics. 2012 Apr;129(4):769-78
pubmed: 22412026
Theriogenology. 2017 Aug;98:88-93
pubmed: 28601161
Anim Reprod Sci. 2017 Jul;182:69-76
pubmed: 28535997
Gamete Res. 1987 Jul;17(3):203-12
pubmed: 3507347
Theriogenology. 1998 Sep;50(4):625-35
pubmed: 10732153
Theriogenology. 2009 Mar 15;71(5):717-28
pubmed: 19150124
Theriogenology. 1999 Dec;52(8):1407-20
pubmed: 10735085
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Oct;96(10):6366-77
pubmed: 23932128
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Mar;96(3):1905-14
pubmed: 23357013
Anim Reprod Sci. 2008 Apr;105(1-2):129-38
pubmed: 18178041
Biol Reprod. 1983 Mar;28(2):312-21
pubmed: 6682341
Theriogenology. 2009 Jan 1;71(1):59-63
pubmed: 18992932
Theriogenology. 2007 Aug;68(3):443-6
pubmed: 17512976
J Anim Sci. 1999;77 Suppl 2:213-20
pubmed: 15526798
Animal. 2014 May;8 Suppl 1:160-4
pubmed: 24680061

Auteurs

S Diers (S)

Department of Animal Science, Georg-August-University, Burckhardtweg 2, Göttingen 37077, Germany.

J Heise (J)

IT Solutions for Animal Production (vit), Heinrich-Schröder-Weg 1, Verden 27283, Germany.

T Krebs (T)

Department of Animal Science, Georg-August-University, Burckhardtweg 2, Göttingen 37077, Germany.

J Groenewold (J)

Chamber of Agriculture Lower Saxony, Mars-la-Tour-Straße 6, Oldenburg 26121, Germany.

J Tetens (J)

Department of Animal Science, Georg-August-University, Burckhardtweg 2, Göttingen 37077, Germany.

Classifications MeSH