Prescription of Sulphonylureas among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Italy: Results from the Retrospective, Observational Multicentre Cross-Sectional SUSCIPE (Sulphonyl_UreaS_Correct_Internal_Prescription_Evaluation) Study.
Diabetes mellitus
Elderly
Hypoglycemia
Obesity
Overweight
Sulphonylureas
Journal
Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders
ISSN: 1869-6953
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101539025
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
30
04
2020
pubmed:
1
8
2020
medline:
1
8
2020
entrez:
1
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recent guidelines for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) provide evidence supporting limited use of sulphonylureas (SUs), especially in specific risk patient categories, yet data from national registries still suggest their widespread use. The aim of this study was to investigate characteristics of patients with diabetes treated with SUs and quantify the proportion of patients that met the recommendations for use of SUs by recent guidelines and of those presenting characteristics representing an inappropriate prescription risk (IPR). A multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study in patients with T2DM receiving treatment with SUs (as monotherapy or in combination with another diabetes therapy) was conducted between 2017 and 2018 in 22 outpatient diabetes clinics across Italy. Exclusion criteria were type 1 diabetes, diabetes mellitus secondary to other conditions, and presence of severe/life-threatening diseases. A total of 510 patients with T2DM (306 men, 204 women; mean age ± standard deviation 69.8 ± 9.3 years) who were receiving treatment with a SU (as monotherapy or in combination therapy) were assessed in the study. Overall, 70.6% [n = 360; 95% confidence interval (CI) 66.4%, 74.5%] were assessed to have an IPR. Of these, approximately half presented one factor for risk of inappropriate prescription, and 27 and 10.6% presented two and three factors, respectively. In terms of factors contributing to the total burden of risk of inappropriate treatment with SUs, 37.5% (95% CI 33.2%, 41.8%) of all patients were obese; 33.3% (95% CI 29.3%, 37.6%)] were aged ≥ 75 years; 18.6% (95% CI 15.3%, 22.3%) had a history of cardiovascular disease; 14.1% (95% CI 11.2%, 17.4%) had chronic renal insufficiency; 1.8% (95% CI 0.8%, 3.3%) had a history of severe hypoglycemia; 1.8% (95% CI 0.8%; 3.3%) had cognitive impairment; and 2.4% (95% CI 1.2%, 4.1%) had a risky occupation. The results of this study provide evidence of a high rate of inappropriate SU prescription risk among patients with T2DM, especially among those with overweight/obesity, older age, history of cardiovascular disease, and hypoglycemia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32734558
doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00871-5
pii: 10.1007/s13300-020-00871-5
pmc: PMC7434823
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2105-2119Références
BMJ. 2018 Jul 18;362:k2693
pubmed: 30021781
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jun;11(Suppl 1):1-3
pubmed: 32323157
J Inflamm Res. 2016 Apr 11;9:27-38
pubmed: 27114714
Diabetes Care. 2012 Dec;35(12):e82
pubmed: 23173143
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2117-28
pubmed: 26378978
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Jun;7(6):442-451
pubmed: 31047901
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 27;13(8):e0202563
pubmed: 30148851
World J Diabetes. 2014 Oct 15;5(5):697-710
pubmed: 25317247
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):311-22
pubmed: 27295427
JAMA. 2019 Sep 19;:
pubmed: 31536101
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;(4):CD009008
pubmed: 23633364
N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 28;377(13):1228-1239
pubmed: 28910237
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Dec 02;24:8707-8715
pubmed: 30504761
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 1;135(6):586-593
pubmed: 28472362
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jun;11(Suppl 1):5-14
pubmed: 32323155
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 2;376(9):891-2
pubmed: 28249135
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Oct;6(10):821-832
pubmed: 29501322
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S90-S102
pubmed: 30559235
Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2669-2701
pubmed: 30291106
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2014 Apr 03;6(1):50
pubmed: 24694251
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015 Oct;110(1):75-81
pubmed: 26361859
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 23;377(21):2099
pubmed: 29166232
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Jan-Feb;22(1):132-157
pubmed: 29535952
Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53
pubmed: 9742976
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Jan;20(1):49-51
pubmed: 29388338
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Sep;143:101-112
pubmed: 29944968
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Apr;21(4):761-771
pubmed: 30471177
Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov;32 Suppl 2:S357-61
pubmed: 19875581
Diabetes Care. 2007 May;30(5):1241-7
pubmed: 17290034
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2018 Nov 16;6(1):e000563
pubmed: 30487973
J Diabetes Investig. 2016 Sep;7(5):674-6
pubmed: 27181105
Diabetes Care. 2014 Nov;37(11):3106-13
pubmed: 25150157