Efficacy of Bezlotoxumab in Trial Participants Infected With Clostridioides difficile Strain BI Associated With Poor Outcomes.


Journal

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
ISSN: 1537-6591
Titre abrégé: Clin Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203213

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 11 2021
Historique:
received: 01 04 2020
accepted: 30 07 2020
pubmed: 1 8 2020
medline: 11 11 2021
entrez: 1 8 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Bezlotoxumab reduced rates of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) vs placebo in Monoclonal Antibodies for C. difficile Therapy (MODIFY) I/II trial participants receiving antibacterial drug treatment for CDI. A secondary objective of MODIFY I/II was to assess bezlotoxumab's efficacy against C. difficile strains associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality. In this post-hoc analysis of pooled MODIFY I/II data, efficacy endpoints were assessed in participants infected with restriction endonuclease analysis BI and non-BI strains of C. difficile at study entry. Treatment outcomes were compared between participants receiving bezlotoxumab (alone or with actoxumab [B, B+A]) and those receiving no bezlotoxumab (placebo or actoxumab [P, A]). From 2559 randomized participants, C. difficile was isolated from 1588 (67.2%) baseline stool samples. Participants with BI strains (n = 328) were older and had more risk factors for rCDI than non-BI strain participants (n = 1260). There were no differences in initial clinical cure rate between BI and non-BI strains in either group. The rCDI rate for BI strains treated with bezlotoxumab was lower than for the no bezlotoxumab group (B, B+A vs P, A: 23.6% vs 43.9%) and was also lower for the non-BI strains (B, B+A vs P, A: 21.4% vs 36.1%). Rates of 30-day CDI-associated rehospitalization were greater with BI vs non-BI strains in both groups. Infection with BI strains of C. difficile predicted poor outcomes in the MODIFY I/II trials. Bezlotoxumab (alone or with actoxumab) treatment was effective both in BI and non-BI subpopulations.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Bezlotoxumab reduced rates of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) vs placebo in Monoclonal Antibodies for C. difficile Therapy (MODIFY) I/II trial participants receiving antibacterial drug treatment for CDI. A secondary objective of MODIFY I/II was to assess bezlotoxumab's efficacy against C. difficile strains associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality.
METHODS
In this post-hoc analysis of pooled MODIFY I/II data, efficacy endpoints were assessed in participants infected with restriction endonuclease analysis BI and non-BI strains of C. difficile at study entry. Treatment outcomes were compared between participants receiving bezlotoxumab (alone or with actoxumab [B, B+A]) and those receiving no bezlotoxumab (placebo or actoxumab [P, A]).
RESULTS
From 2559 randomized participants, C. difficile was isolated from 1588 (67.2%) baseline stool samples. Participants with BI strains (n = 328) were older and had more risk factors for rCDI than non-BI strain participants (n = 1260). There were no differences in initial clinical cure rate between BI and non-BI strains in either group. The rCDI rate for BI strains treated with bezlotoxumab was lower than for the no bezlotoxumab group (B, B+A vs P, A: 23.6% vs 43.9%) and was also lower for the non-BI strains (B, B+A vs P, A: 21.4% vs 36.1%). Rates of 30-day CDI-associated rehospitalization were greater with BI vs non-BI strains in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Infection with BI strains of C. difficile predicted poor outcomes in the MODIFY I/II trials. Bezlotoxumab (alone or with actoxumab) treatment was effective both in BI and non-BI subpopulations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32735653
pii: 5879351
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1035
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal 0
Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies 0
bezlotoxumab 4H5YMK1H2E

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e2616-e2624

Subventions

Organisme : Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Stuart Johnson (S)

Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois, USA.
Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois, USA.

Diane M Citron (DM)

R. M. Alden Research Laboratory, Culver City, California, USA.

Dale N Gerding (DN)

Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois, USA.

Mark H Wilcox (MH)

Leeds Teaching Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Ellie J C Goldstein (EJC)

R. M. Alden Research Laboratory, Culver City, California, USA.

Susan P Sambol (SP)

Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois, USA.
Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois, USA.

Emma L Best (EL)

Leeds Teaching Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Karen Eves (K)

Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.

Erin Jensen (E)

Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.

Mary Beth Dorr (MB)

Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH