Topographic Analysis of Lateral Versus Medial Femoral Condyle Donor Sites for Oblong Medial Femoral Condyle Lesions.
Journal
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association
ISSN: 1526-3231
Titre abrégé: Arthroscopy
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8506498
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
received:
09
12
2019
revised:
29
06
2020
accepted:
03
07
2020
pubmed:
1
8
2020
medline:
30
4
2021
entrez:
1
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To analyze the topographic matching of oblong osteochondral allografts to treat large oval medial femoral condyle (MFC) lesions using computer simulation models. The secondary objective was to determine whether lateral femoral condyle (LFC) grafts would have a similar surface matching when compared with MFC grafts in this setting. Human femoral hemicondyles (10 MFCs, 7 LFCs) underwent 3-dimensional computed tomography. Models were created from computed tomography images and exported into point-cloud models. Donor-recipient matches with large condylar width mismatch were excluded. The remaining specimen were divided into 3 donor-recipient groups with 2 defect sizes (17 × 30 mm and 20 × 30 mm): 20 MFC donor (MFCd)-MFC recipient (MFCr), 27 ipsilateral LFC donor (LFCd)-MFCr, and 26 contralateral LFCd-MFCr. Grafts were optimally virtually aligned with the MFCr defect. Mismatch of the articular cartilage and subchondral bone surfaces between the graft and the defect and articular step-off were calculated. MFCd grafts resulted in articular cartilage surface mismatch and peripheral step of less than 0.5 mm for both defect sizes. The subchondral bone surface mismatch was significantly greater than the articular cartilage surface mismatch (P < .01) in both defect sizes). Conversely, the ipsilateral and contralateral LFCd grafts resulted in significantly greater articular cartilage surface mismatch and step-off for both defect sizes when compared to MFCd grafts (P < .01). Oblong MFC allografts provide acceptable topographic matching for large oval MFC lesions when condylar width differences are minimized. However, concern exists in using oblong LFC allografts for MFC defects, as this can result in increased peripheral step-off and surface mismatch. These data reinforce the ability to use oblong MFC osteochondral allograft for treating oval cartilage lesions of the MFC when condylar width is considered. Although other studies have demonstrated LFCs can be used to treat circular defects on the MFC, this may not be true for oblong grafts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32735941
pii: S0749-8063(20)30600-9
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.07.007
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2900-2908Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.