Safety and efficacy of brainstem biopsy in children and young adults.

biopsy brainstem intraoperative MRI oncology stereotactic

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
ISSN: 1933-0715
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Pediatr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101463759

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 Jul 2020
Historique:
received: 19 02 2020
accepted: 29 04 2020
pubmed: 1 8 2020
medline: 1 8 2020
entrez: 1 8 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Biopsies of brainstem lesions are performed to establish a diagnosis in the setting of an atypical clinical or radiological presentation, or to facilitate molecular studies. A better understanding of the safety and diagnostic yield of brainstem biopsies would help guide appropriate patient selection. All patients who underwent biopsy of a brainstem lesion during the period from January 2011 to June 2019 were reviewed. Demographic, radiological, surgical, and outcome data were collected. A total of 58 patients underwent 65 brainstem biopsies during the study period. Overall, the median age was 7.6 years (IQR 3.9-14.2 years). Twenty-two of the 65 biopsies (34%) were open, 42 (65%) were stereotactic, and 1 was endoscopic. In 3 cases (5%), a ventriculoperitoneal shunt was placed, and in 9 cases (14%), a posterior fossa decompression was performed during the same operative session as the biopsy. An intraoperative MRI (iMRI) was performed in 28 cases (43%). In 3 of these cases (11%), the biopsy was off target and additional samples were obtained during the same procedure. New neurological deficits were noted in 5 cases (8%), including sensory deficits, ophthalmoparesis/nystagmus, facial weakness, and hearing loss; these deficits persisted in 2 cases and were transient in 3 cases. A pseudomeningocele occurred in 1 patient; no patients developed a CSF leak or infection. In 8 cases (13%) an additional procedure was needed to obtain a diagnosis. Brainstem biopsies are safe and effective. Target selection and approach should be a collaborative effort. iMRI can be used to assess biopsy accuracy in real time, thereby allowing any adjustment if necessary.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32736346
doi: 10.3171/2020.4.PEDS2092
pii: 2020.4.PEDS2092
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

552-562

Auteurs

David S Hersh (DS)

1Division of Neurosurgery, Connecticut Children's, Hartford.
2Department of Surgery, UConn School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut.

Rahul Kumar (R)

3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.

Kenneth A Moore (KA)

3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.

Luke G F Smith (LGF)

4Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Departments of.

Christopher L Tinkle (CL)

5Radiation Oncology.

Jason Chiang (J)

6Pathology, and.

Zoltan Patay (Z)

7Diagnostic Imaging, and.

Amar Gajjar (A)

8Division of Neuro-oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis.

Asim F Choudhri (AF)

3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
9Department of Radiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.
10Division of Neuroradiology, Le Bonheur Neuroscience Institute, Memphis.
11Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis; and.

Jorge A Lee-Diaz (JA)

3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
9Department of Radiology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.
10Division of Neuroradiology, Le Bonheur Neuroscience Institute, Memphis.
11Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis; and.

Brandy Vaughn (B)

11Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis; and.

Paul Klimo (P)

3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
11Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis; and.
12Semmes Murphey, Memphis, Tennessee.

Classifications MeSH