The use of innominate artery cannulation for antegrade cerebral perfusion in aortic dissection.
Aortic arch
Aortic dissection
Cerebral perfusion
Direct innominate cannulation
Outcomes
Journal
Journal of cardiothoracic surgery
ISSN: 1749-8090
Titre abrégé: J Cardiothorac Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265113
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Jul 2020
31 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
24
03
2020
accepted:
21
07
2020
entrez:
2
8
2020
pubmed:
2
8
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Direct cannulation of the innominate artery for selective antegrade cerebral perfusion has been shown to be safe in elective proximal aortic reconstructions. We sought to evaluate the safety of this technique in acute aortic dissection. A multi-institutional retrospective review was undertaken of patients who underwent proximal aortic reconstruction for Stanford type A dissection between 2006 and 2016. Those patients who had direct innominate artery cannulation for selective antegrade cerebral perfusion were selected for analysis. Seventy-five patients underwent innominate artery cannulation for ACP for Stanford Type A Dissections. Isolated replacement of the ascending aorta was performed in 36 patients (48.0%), concomitant aortic root replacement was required in 35 patients (46.7%), of whom 7 had a valve-sparing aortic root replacement, ascending aorta and arch replacement was required in 4 patients (5%). Other procedures included frozen elephant trunk (n = 11 (14.7%)), coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 20 (26.7%)), and peripheral arterial bypass (n = 4 (5.3%)). Mean hypothermic circulatory arrest time was 19 ± 13 min. Thirty-day mortality was 14.7% (n = 11). Perioperative stroke occurred in 7 patients (9.3%). This study is the first comprehensive review of direct innominate artery cannulation through median sternotomy for selective antegrade cerebral perfusion in aortic dissection. Our experience suggests that this strategy is a safe and effective technique compared to other reported methods of cannulation and cerebral protection for delivering selective antegrade cerebral perfusion in these cases.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Direct cannulation of the innominate artery for selective antegrade cerebral perfusion has been shown to be safe in elective proximal aortic reconstructions. We sought to evaluate the safety of this technique in acute aortic dissection.
METHODS
METHODS
A multi-institutional retrospective review was undertaken of patients who underwent proximal aortic reconstruction for Stanford type A dissection between 2006 and 2016. Those patients who had direct innominate artery cannulation for selective antegrade cerebral perfusion were selected for analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Seventy-five patients underwent innominate artery cannulation for ACP for Stanford Type A Dissections. Isolated replacement of the ascending aorta was performed in 36 patients (48.0%), concomitant aortic root replacement was required in 35 patients (46.7%), of whom 7 had a valve-sparing aortic root replacement, ascending aorta and arch replacement was required in 4 patients (5%). Other procedures included frozen elephant trunk (n = 11 (14.7%)), coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 20 (26.7%)), and peripheral arterial bypass (n = 4 (5.3%)). Mean hypothermic circulatory arrest time was 19 ± 13 min. Thirty-day mortality was 14.7% (n = 11). Perioperative stroke occurred in 7 patients (9.3%).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study is the first comprehensive review of direct innominate artery cannulation through median sternotomy for selective antegrade cerebral perfusion in aortic dissection. Our experience suggests that this strategy is a safe and effective technique compared to other reported methods of cannulation and cerebral protection for delivering selective antegrade cerebral perfusion in these cases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32736644
doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01249-1
pii: 10.1186/s13019-020-01249-1
pmc: PMC7393698
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
205Références
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;99(6):2024-31
pubmed: 25890664
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Apr;27(4):634-7
pubmed: 15784364
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 May;62(5):296-300
pubmed: 24310294
Aorta (Stamford). 2016 Aug 01;4(4):115-123
pubmed: 28097193
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;2(3):288-95
pubmed: 23977596
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;151(4):1073-8
pubmed: 26725716
J Card Surg. 2014 Sep;29(5):729-32
pubmed: 25060898
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):e44-52
pubmed: 26510701
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Jan;129(1):112-22
pubmed: 15632832
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Sep;104(3):767-772
pubmed: 28551049
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Dec;48(6):937-42; discussion 942
pubmed: 25646398
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jul 28;66(4):350-8
pubmed: 26205591
Circulation. 2009 Sep 15;120(11 Suppl):S282-6
pubmed: 19752380
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jul;5(4):346-51
pubmed: 27563547
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Mar;2(2):222-8
pubmed: 23977587
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep;90(3):731-7
pubmed: 20732486
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 10;7(6):e014491
pubmed: 28601820
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Feb;133(2):428-34
pubmed: 17258578
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Mar;89(3):800-3
pubmed: 20172131
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Aug;90(2):547-54
pubmed: 20667348
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jan;99(1):80-7
pubmed: 25442989
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 May;147(5):1488-92
pubmed: 24629218
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;148(6):2920-4
pubmed: 25172323
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Mar;145(3 Suppl):S191-6
pubmed: 23260457