Circulating unmethylated CHTOP and INS DNA fragments provide evidence of possible islet cell death in youth with obesity and diabetes.
Biomarker
Cell-free DNA
Diabetes
Islet
Journal
Clinical epigenetics
ISSN: 1868-7083
Titre abrégé: Clin Epigenetics
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101516977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 07 2020
31 07 2020
Historique:
received:
04
05
2020
accepted:
14
07
2020
entrez:
2
8
2020
pubmed:
2
8
2020
medline:
27
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Identification of islet β cell death prior to the onset of type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) might allow for interventions to protect β cells and reduce diabetes risk. Circulating unmethylated DNA fragments arising from the human INS gene have been proposed as biomarkers of β cell death, but this gene alone may not be sufficiently specific to report β cell death. To identify new candidate genes whose CpG sites may show greater specificity for β cells, we performed unbiased DNA methylation analysis using the Infinium HumanMethylation 450 array on 64 human islet preparations and 27 non-islet human tissues. For verification of array results, bisulfite DNA sequencing of human β cells and 11 non-β cell tissues was performed on 5 of the top 10 CpG sites that were found to be differentially methylated. We identified the CHTOP gene as a candidate whose CpGs show a greater frequency of unmethylation in human islets. A digital PCR strategy was used to determine the methylation pattern of CHTOP and INS CpG sites in primary human tissues. Although both INS and CHTOP contained unmethylated CpG sites in non-islet tissues, they occurred in a non-overlapping pattern. Based on Naïve Bayes classifier analysis, the two genes together report 100% specificity for islet damage. Digital PCR was then performed on cell-free DNA from serum from human subjects. Compared to healthy controls (N = 10), differentially methylated CHTOP and INS levels were higher in youth with new onset T1D (N = 43) and, unexpectedly, in healthy autoantibody-negative youth who have first-degree relatives with T1D (N = 23). When tested in lean (N = 32) and obese (N = 118) youth, increased levels of unmethylated INS and CHTOP were observed in obese individuals. Our data suggest that concurrent measurement of circulating unmethylated INS and CHTOP has the potential to detect islet death in youth at risk for both T1D and T2D. Our data also support the use of multiple parameters to increase the confidence of detecting islet damage in individuals at risk for developing diabetes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Identification of islet β cell death prior to the onset of type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) might allow for interventions to protect β cells and reduce diabetes risk. Circulating unmethylated DNA fragments arising from the human INS gene have been proposed as biomarkers of β cell death, but this gene alone may not be sufficiently specific to report β cell death.
RESULTS
To identify new candidate genes whose CpG sites may show greater specificity for β cells, we performed unbiased DNA methylation analysis using the Infinium HumanMethylation 450 array on 64 human islet preparations and 27 non-islet human tissues. For verification of array results, bisulfite DNA sequencing of human β cells and 11 non-β cell tissues was performed on 5 of the top 10 CpG sites that were found to be differentially methylated. We identified the CHTOP gene as a candidate whose CpGs show a greater frequency of unmethylation in human islets. A digital PCR strategy was used to determine the methylation pattern of CHTOP and INS CpG sites in primary human tissues. Although both INS and CHTOP contained unmethylated CpG sites in non-islet tissues, they occurred in a non-overlapping pattern. Based on Naïve Bayes classifier analysis, the two genes together report 100% specificity for islet damage. Digital PCR was then performed on cell-free DNA from serum from human subjects. Compared to healthy controls (N = 10), differentially methylated CHTOP and INS levels were higher in youth with new onset T1D (N = 43) and, unexpectedly, in healthy autoantibody-negative youth who have first-degree relatives with T1D (N = 23). When tested in lean (N = 32) and obese (N = 118) youth, increased levels of unmethylated INS and CHTOP were observed in obese individuals.
CONCLUSION
Our data suggest that concurrent measurement of circulating unmethylated INS and CHTOP has the potential to detect islet death in youth at risk for both T1D and T2D. Our data also support the use of multiple parameters to increase the confidence of detecting islet damage in individuals at risk for developing diabetes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32736653
doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00906-5
pii: 10.1186/s13148-020-00906-5
pmc: PMC7393900
doi:
Substances chimiques
CHTOP protein, human
0
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids
0
Insulin
0
Nuclear Proteins
0
Transcription Factors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
116Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000005
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK105588
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P30 DK097512
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK093954
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P30 DK020595
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK127308
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : UC4 DK104166
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : U01 DK127786
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK060581
Pays : United States
Références
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Feb;101(2):523-32
pubmed: 26700560
Diabetes Care. 2013 Nov;36(11):3818-20
pubmed: 24062329
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 22;108(47):19018-23
pubmed: 22074781
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 19;114(51):13525-13530
pubmed: 29203669
Diabetes Care. 2010 Oct;33(10):2225-31
pubmed: 20592052
Diabetes Care. 2011 Sep;34(9):2033-40
pubmed: 21750275
Pediatr Diabetes. 2012 Aug;13(5):419-24
pubmed: 21446926
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 25;11(4):e0152662
pubmed: 27111653
Endocrinology. 2017 Jul 1;158(7):2058-2065
pubmed: 28525638
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 10;9(4):e94591
pubmed: 24722187
Diabetes. 2003 Jan;52(1):102-10
pubmed: 12502499
FASEB J. 2018 May 29;:fj201800150RR
pubmed: 29812970
Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):632-8
pubmed: 20028940
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jun;36(6):1607-12
pubmed: 23275361
Rev Diabet Stud. 2010 Fall;7(3):202-8
pubmed: 21409312
Diabetes. 2015 Nov;64(11):3867-72
pubmed: 26216854
Mol Metab. 2019 Sep;27S:S129-S138
pubmed: 31500824
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jul;96(7):2136-45
pubmed: 21508130
J Histochem Cytochem. 2001 Apr;49(4):519-28
pubmed: 11259455
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Feb 1;104(2):451-460
pubmed: 30203041
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D794-D801
pubmed: 29126249
Diabetes Care. 2019 Feb;42(2):281-287
pubmed: 30552130
Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:767-93
pubmed: 22443930
Am J Transplant. 2017 Apr;17(4):1112-1118
pubmed: 27643615
Diabetes. 2014 Nov;63(11):3846-55
pubmed: 24947360
J Clin Invest. 2015 Mar 2;125(3):1163-73
pubmed: 25642774
Genomics. 2011 Oct;98(4):288-95
pubmed: 21839163
Diabetes. 2014 Nov;63(11):3960-73
pubmed: 24760139
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008 Nov;10 Suppl 4:32-42
pubmed: 18834431
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):1003-5
pubmed: 23995387
J Clin Invest. 2014 May;124(5):2087-98
pubmed: 24667639
Diabetologia. 2012 Sep;55(9):2417-20
pubmed: 22699564
Ann Clin Biochem. 2010 May;47(Pt 3):253-8
pubmed: 20421309
Epigenetics Chromatin. 2013 Mar 03;6(1):4
pubmed: 23452981
Diabetes Care. 2016 Sep;39(9):1519-26
pubmed: 27385327
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 29;113(13):E1826-34
pubmed: 26976580
J Vis Exp. 2016 Dec 21;(118):
pubmed: 28060259
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Mar;101(3):1044-54
pubmed: 26713822