The potency of hsa-miR-9-1 overexpression in photoreceptor differentiation of conjunctiva mesenchymal stem cells on a 3D nanofibrous scaffold.
Cell Differentiation
/ genetics
Cells, Cultured
Conjunctiva
/ cytology
Fibroins
/ chemistry
Gene Expression Regulation
Humans
Mesenchymal Stem Cells
/ cytology
MicroRNAs
/ genetics
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Microscopy, Fluorescence
Nanofibers
/ chemistry
Photoreceptor Cells, Vertebrate
/ cytology
Polyesters
/ chemistry
Time Factors
Tissue Engineering
/ methods
Tissue Scaffolds
/ chemistry
Conjunctiva mesenchymal stem cells
Nanofibrous scaffold
Photoreceptor differentiation
miR-9 overexpression
Journal
Biochemical and biophysical research communications
ISSN: 1090-2104
Titre abrégé: Biochem Biophys Res Commun
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372516
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 08 2020
27 08 2020
Historique:
received:
08
05
2020
accepted:
03
06
2020
entrez:
2
8
2020
pubmed:
2
8
2020
medline:
23
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
MiRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that are ordinarily involved in modulating mRNAs and stem cell differentiation. 3D nanofibrous scaffolds have an important role in the differentiation of stem cells due to their similarity to the extracellular matrix (ECM). In the present study, we tried to introduce a new approach to guiding the differentiation of conjunctiva mesenchymal stem cells (CJMSCs) into photoreceptor-like cells by hsa-miR-9-1 delivery on both 2D and 3D substrates. First, the CJMSCs were transduced by a lentiviral vector carrying miR-9 (pCDH + hsa-miR-9-1) and then cell transduction efficacy verified by using fluorescent microscopy, flow cytometry, and qPCR analyses. Silk Fibroin-poly-L-lactic acid (SF-PLLA) scaffold was fabricated by the electrospinning technique while the scaffold characteristics including morphology, chemical properties, and biocompatibility were evaluated by SEM, FTIR, and MTT assays, respectively. Then, the miR-9-CJMSCs were seeded on both TCPS and the scaffold; photoreceptor gene and protein expressions were evaluated by RT-qPCR and immunostaining after 14 and 21 days of transduction. More than 80% of CJMSCs were transduced and miR-9 expression was significantly higher in miR-9-CJMSCs compared with empty vector (EV)-CJMSCs. SEM and FTIR confirmed the fabrication of the SF/PLLA hybrid structure. RT-qPCR and immunostaining analyses showed that the specific photoreceptor genes and proteins were expressed in miR-9 transduced CJMSCs. Mir-9 induced CJMSCs into photoreceptor-like cells in a time-dependent manneron on both TCPS and nanofibrous scaffold.We have proved that hsa-miR-9-1 has the potency to guide the photoreceptor differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and promote retinal regeneration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32736669
pii: S0006-291X(20)31200-6
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.06.006
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
MIRN92 microRNA, human
0
MicroRNAs
0
Polyesters
0
poly(lactide)
459TN2L5F5
Fibroins
9007-76-5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
526-532Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Please note that all Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications authors are required to report the following potential conflicts of interest with each submission. If applicable to your manuscript, please provide the necessary declaration in the box above. (1) All bi-party financial support for the work in the submitted manuscript. (2) All financial relationships with any entities that could be viewed as relevant to the general area of the submitted manuscript. (3) All sources of revenue with relevance to the submitted work who made payments to you, or to your institution on your behalf, in the 36 months prior to submission. (4) Any other interactions with the sponsor of outside of the submitted work should also be reported. (5) Any relevant patents or copyrights (planned, pending, or issued). (6) Any other relationships or affiliations that may be perceived by readers to have influenced, or give the appearance of potentially influencing, what you wrote in the submitted work. As a general guideline, it is usually better to disclose a relationship than not.