The association between lower Hounsfield units on computed tomography and cage subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
AUC = area under the ROC curve
BMD = bone mineral density
BMP = bone morphogenetic protein
CT
DXA = dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
HU
HU = Hounsfield unit
Hounsfield units
ICC = interclass correlation coefficient
LLIF
LLIF = lateral lumbar interbody fusion
PACS = picture archiving and communication system
ROC = receiver operating characteristic
ROI = region of interest
UCSF = University of California, San Francisco
cage subsidence
lateral lumbar interbody fusion
qCT = quantitative CT
Journal
Neurosurgical focus
ISSN: 1092-0684
Titre abrégé: Neurosurg Focus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100896471
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
01
03
2020
accepted:
13
05
2020
entrez:
2
8
2020
pubmed:
2
8
2020
medline:
31
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
One vexing problem after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) surgery is cage subsidence. Low bone mineral density (BMD) may contribute to subsidence, and BMD is correlated with Hounsfield units (HUs) on CT. The authors investigated if lower HU values correlated with subsidence after LLIF. A retrospective study of patients undergoing single-level LLIF with pedicle screw fixation for degenerative conditions at the University of California, San Francisco, by 6 spine surgeons was performed. Data on demographics, cage parameters, preoperative HUs on CT, and postoperative subsidence were collected. Thirty-six-inch standing radiographs were used to measure segmental lordosis, disc space height, and subsidence; data were collected immediately postoperatively and at 1 year. Subsidence was graded using a published grade of disc height loss: grade 0, 0%-24%; grade I, 25%-49%; grade II, 50%-74%; and grade III, 75%-100%. HU values were measured on preoperative CT from L1 to L5, and each lumbar vertebral body HU was measured 4 separate times. After identifying 138 patients who underwent LLIF, 68 met the study inclusion criteria. All patients had single-level LLIF with pedicle screw fixation. The mean follow-up duration was 25.3 ± 10.4 months. There were 40 patients who had grade 0 subsidence, 15 grade I, 9 grade II, and 4 grade III. There were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, or smoking. There were no significant differences in cage sizes, cage lordosis, and preoperative disc height. The mean segmental HU (the average HU value of the two vertebrae above and below the LLIF) was 169.5 ± 45 for grade 0, 130.3 ± 56.2 for grade I, 100.7 ± 30.2 for grade II, and 119.9 ± 52.9 for grade III (p < 0.001). After using a receiver operating characteristic curve to establish separation criteria between mild and severe subsidence, the most appropriate threshold of HU value was 135.02 between mild and severe subsidence (sensitivity 60%, specificity 92.3%). After univariate and multivariate analysis, preoperative segmental HU value was an independent risk factor for severe cage subsidence (p = 0.017, OR 15.694, 95% CI 1.621-151.961). Lower HU values on preoperative CT are associated with cage subsidence after LLIF. Measurement of preoperative HU values on CT may be useful when planning LLIF surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32738801
doi: 10.3171/2020.5.FOCUS20169
pii: 2020.5.FOCUS20169
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM