Oral literacy in pediatric otolaryngology surgical consultations amongst parents with high levels of decisional conflict.
Adenoidectomy
Adult
Child
Child, Preschool
Comprehension
Cross-Sectional Studies
Decision Making, Shared
Educational Status
Elective Surgical Procedures
Female
Humans
Infant
Language
Literacy
Male
Otolaryngology
Parents
/ psychology
Physicians
Professional-Family Relations
Referral and Consultation
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tonsillectomy
Head & neck surgery
Health literacy
Oral literacy
Otolaryngology
Pediatric otolaryngology
Shared decision-making
Journal
International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology
ISSN: 1872-8464
Titre abrégé: Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8003603
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
21
05
2020
revised:
18
07
2020
accepted:
19
07
2020
pubmed:
4
8
2020
medline:
1
4
2021
entrez:
4
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Oral literacy is an important aspect of physician and patient/family communication. Adequate communication is essential in the shared decision-making process and is inherently important in pediatric surgical consultations where parents must make decisions for their children. The aim of this study was to describe oral literacy in pediatric otolaryngology consultations and how it may relate to shared decision-making in a cohort of parents experiencing significant decisional conflict. Thirty-six parent/patient-physician interactions from two pediatric otolaryngology clinics were recorded. Parents completed the Decision Conflict Scale (DCS), and both parents and physicians completed the Shared Decision-making (SDM-Q-9/SDM-Q-Doc) questionnaires. Language complexity was assessed by the Flesch Reading Ease Scale (FRES), the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Readability Formula, and a series of grammar statistics. The Pearson product-moment was used to examine the correlation between measures. The mean age of parents was 32.3 (mother) and 34.8 (father) years, with the majority having a college education or greater (77.8%). The mean DCS score was 85.8 (range 56-100), and all parents reported clinically significant conflict scores (DCS score > 25). Physicians spoke at a higher-grade level (mean difference SMOG 1.2 (95% CI: 0.8-1.6)), with more words per sentence (mean difference 3.7 (95% CI: 2.4-4.9)), and longer words (mean difference 0.1 (95% CI: 0.03-0.16)). Parents who had higher language complexity experienced less decisional conflict (SMOG vs DCS, r = -0.471, p = 0.004; words per sentence, r = -0.414, p = 0.012; word length, r = -0.419, p = 0.011), but there was no correlation between physician language complexity and DCS or SDM-Q-9 scores. Physicians demonstrated higher language complexity than that of parents in this study. Differences in language complexity between physicians and parents do not appear to play a substantial role in decisional conflict or the perception of shared decision-making in general. However, parents who use a more complex vocabulary may experience less conflict.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32741748
pii: S0165-5876(20)30412-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110269
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
110269Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.