Sleep quality in women who use different contraceptive methods.
Contraception
Life Style
Sleep
Women
Journal
Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil)
ISSN: 1984-0659
Titre abrégé: Sleep Sci
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101598477
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
4
8
2020
pubmed:
4
8
2020
medline:
4
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Both menstrual cycle and hormone alterations influence sleep pattern. The aim of this study was to evaluate sleep quality in women who use different contraceptive methods. This study was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used to evaluate sleep quality, and a questionnaire was used to obtain sociodemographic, clinical, lifestyle, and contraceptive use data. The study population comprised 235 women in reproductive age. Regarding lifestyle, 25.5% of the women were physically active, 12.3% were tobacco-smoking, and 70.6% drank coffee daily. Sleep quality was good in 34% of the studied population and poor in 66% of the population. The population was divided into two groups: hormonal (57.1%) and non-hormonal (42.9%) contraceptive users. Sleep quality in the users of non-hormonal contraceptive methods was similar to that in the users of hormonal methods (6.1±3.2 versus 5.9±2.9; Nearly half of the studied population was users of hormonal contraception, and most of these women reported poor sleep quality. Sleep efficiency was higher among the users of non-hormonal contraceptives. No differences in subgroups (hormonal contraceptive users) were observed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Both menstrual cycle and hormone alterations influence sleep pattern. The aim of this study was to evaluate sleep quality in women who use different contraceptive methods.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
METHODS
This study was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used to evaluate sleep quality, and a questionnaire was used to obtain sociodemographic, clinical, lifestyle, and contraceptive use data.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The study population comprised 235 women in reproductive age. Regarding lifestyle, 25.5% of the women were physically active, 12.3% were tobacco-smoking, and 70.6% drank coffee daily. Sleep quality was good in 34% of the studied population and poor in 66% of the population. The population was divided into two groups: hormonal (57.1%) and non-hormonal (42.9%) contraceptive users. Sleep quality in the users of non-hormonal contraceptive methods was similar to that in the users of hormonal methods (6.1±3.2 versus 5.9±2.9;
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Nearly half of the studied population was users of hormonal contraception, and most of these women reported poor sleep quality. Sleep efficiency was higher among the users of non-hormonal contraceptives. No differences in subgroups (hormonal contraceptive users) were observed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32742584
doi: 10.5935/1984-0063.20190142
pmc: PMC7384524
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
131-137Références
Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213
pubmed: 2748771
Climacteric. 2010 Dec;13(6):594-603
pubmed: 20001564
J Clin Sleep Med. 2013 Aug 15;9(8):819-24
pubmed: 23946713
Maturitas. 2002 Aug 30;43 Suppl 1:S79-84
pubmed: 12361891
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004 Apr;58(2):179-85
pubmed: 15009824
J Sleep Res. 2012 Dec;21(6):693-9
pubmed: 22607355
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Dec;103(3):207-12
pubmed: 18812241
Sleep Sci. 2018 May-Jun;11(3):129-136
pubmed: 30455843
Compr Ther. 2000 Winter;26(4):298-306
pubmed: 11126102
Menopause. 2005 Sep-Oct;12(5):545-51
pubmed: 16145308
Menopause. 2012 Feb;19(2):186-93
pubmed: 22048261
Sleep Med. 2010 Jun;11(6):520-4
pubmed: 20494615
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2011 Jun;33(6):303-9
pubmed: 21877020
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2013 May;11(3):231-49
pubmed: 24179461
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Feb;120(2):137-40
pubmed: 23195296
Sleep Med. 2011 Jan;12(1):70-5
pubmed: 21145786
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020 Feb;36(2):166-170
pubmed: 31311352
Clin Invest Med. 2012 Apr 01;35(2):E105-13
pubmed: 22469102