Successful treatment with sorafenib for sunitinib-refractory metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma: Potential impact of Raf overexpression on predicting the efficacy of sorafenib.

Raf papillary renal cell carcinoma second‐line therapy sorafenib

Journal

IJU case reports
ISSN: 2577-171X
Titre abrégé: IJU Case Rep
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101764958

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Historique:
received: 06 08 2018
accepted: 20 11 2018
entrez: 4 8 2020
pubmed: 28 12 2018
medline: 28 12 2018
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The prognosis of type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma is often poor. We herein report a case of papillary renal cell carcinoma with liver metastasis that was successfully treated with sorafenib as a second-line therapy. An 82-year-old man who had undergone radical nephrectomy 5 years previously experienced biopsy-proven liver metastasis. He received sunitinib as a first-line treatment; the dose was initially 12.5 mg/day and was escalated to 25 mg/day, but it was discontinued due to several adverse events. We then switched to sorafenib as a second-line treatment, which resulted in a partial response (51% reduction in tumor size); the patient showed no recurrence 5 months after the initiation of sorafenib treatment. An immunohistochemical analysis revealed the overexpression of Raf in both the primary and metastatic tumors. As sorafenib blocks Raf signaling, the expression of Raf may serve as a useful predictor of the efficacy of sorafenib.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32743370
doi: 10.1002/iju5.12035
pii: IJU512035
pmc: PMC7292102
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

43-46

Informations de copyright

© 2018 The Authors. IJU Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Urological Association.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 10;32(8):760-7
pubmed: 24297950
Cancer Med. 2017 May;6(5):902-909
pubmed: 28414866
Ann Oncol. 2012 Aug;23(8):2108-2114
pubmed: 22228449
Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 21;8(12):20441-20451
pubmed: 28099901
Br J Cancer. 2018 Jul;119(2):241-247
pubmed: 29891937
Int J Urol. 2017 Apr;24(4):272-278
pubmed: 28253548
Int J Urol. 2018 Oct;25(10):901-902
pubmed: 30041283
Methods Enzymol. 2006;407:597-612
pubmed: 16757355

Auteurs

Ryota Morinaga (R)

Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.

Takashi Kawahara (T)

Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.
Department of Urology Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama Japan.

Jun-Ichi Teranishi (JI)

Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.

Makoto Chuma (M)

Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.

Koji Izumi (K)

Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.

Yasuhide Miyoshi (Y)

Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.

Masahiro Yao (M)

Department of Urology Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama Japan.

Masako Otani (M)

Division of Diagnostic Pathology Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.

Hiroshi Miyamoto (H)

Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Urology, and Oncology University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA.

Hiroji Uemura (H)

Departments of Urology and Renal Transplantation Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.

Classifications MeSH